WyoFile spoke with former U.S. Sen. Alan Simpson (R), a long-time supporter of gay rights, to get his views on Guzzo v. Mead, the same-sex marriage case that was the subject of a federal court hearing Thursday in Casper.

During the interview — which took place Friday morning before the judge issued an order that day — Simpson offered what may turn out to be a prescient forecast. “Regardless of what happens in this case, we will have gay marriage in Wyoming this year,” Simpson said. “That’s my feeling.”

Just hours after this interview, federal Judge Scott Skavdahl ruled that 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decisions make Wyoming’s law banning same-sex marriage unconstitutional. He approved the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction requesting that same-sex couples be allowed to marry immediately.

Skavdahl also issued a seven-day stay of the ruling, allowing time for the state to file an appeal. Senior assistant attorney general Jared Crecelius said during the hearing Thursday that the state would likely appeal a ruling made in favor of the plaintiffs.

However, Gov. Matt Mead (R) said in a debate Thursday night that he will not pursue an appeal, and reaffirmed that position in a statement issued Friday.

“This result is contrary to my personal beliefs and those of many others,” Mead’s statement said. “As in all matters, I respect the role of the courts and the ruling of the Court. While this is not the result I and others would have hoped, I recognize people have different points of view and I hope all citizens agree, we are bound by the law.”

While the ruling won’t be final until the stay is lifted, it appears that same-sex marriage is coming to the Equality State.

WyoFile: Some advocates for same-sex marriage are saying this case should be open-and-shut. What’s your take?

Sen. Simpson: When the 10th Circuit does something, that’s us. We are a part of the 10th Circuit, and it is difficult for me to see how you could be the one state, or one of the states in the Circuit, that would be in an opposite decision than what the 10th Circuit Court did, and what the Supreme Court of the United States did where they rejected hearing those appeals.  …

It is a case that is not open-and-shut. I don’t know that anything is. The principles and the previous decisions would certainly indicate that we are going to have that (same-sex marriage) in Wyoming.

WyoFile: Is marriage a fundamental right, no matter who the people getting married are?

Sen. Simpson: It’s very simple to me. It is a simplistic approach to life. We are all God’s children. We are all human beings.

… I have been active in the community for a long time. I had a gay cousin who was a war hero — he got medals for his service overseas — and a lesbian cousin who was a music teacher in Illinois, and she was an amazing woman who had a partner for 30 years. Were they any lesser people? Not one bit. I loved them. … We all know someone we know or love who is gay or lesbian.

… I know people who have partners and are married with children. I know these people. I care about them. I have made no distinction at all.

There is a wonderful woman in Cody who was raised by two gay men and she said they were the most pure people of her life. She is married now with children and she said, “How could you have been any more loved than by these two guys?”

The Wyoming State seal contains the motto "equal rights," a reference to women's suffrage. Historian Phil Roberts has said the "Equality State" nickname is an aspirational motto for Wyoming to strive for. Same-sex marriage proponents have made the seal part of their campaigns. (Wikimedia Commons — click to enlarge)
The Wyoming State seal contains the motto “equal rights,” a reference to women’s suffrage. Historian Phil Roberts has said the “Equality State” nickname is an aspirational motto for Wyoming to strive for. Same-sex marriage proponents have made the seal part of their campaign. (Wikimedia Common)

WyoFile: What is Wyoming’s role in this issue?

Sen. Simpson: It is called the Equality State — how about that for hypocrisy?

We are known in the world and in the state seal as the Equality State. We were the first territory in the world in 1869 — we became a state in ’90 — when we gave women the right to vote, and the next year we gave them the right to contract. Those things had been denied to women.

If you know this is the Equality State, man, hop aboard. If we are the Equality State, then every single human being is equal.

If you want to add the last link to our slogan as a great state, then what is more appropriate than giving the same rights of equality, the right to marry, the right to contract, to do everything that all of us do? That’s why this thing (Wyoming’s ban on same-sex marriage) is crumbling.

WyoFile: Do you think the gubernatorial election is playing a role in the state’s opposition of same-sex marriage even in the face of the 10th Circuit ruling?

Sen. Simpson: I don’t think that has anything to do with this election, because you are not going to have people on the ballot who are going to be talking about it very much, although they have all stated their case. But they are not running ads on the social issues except with regard to the fringe areas. Those social issues are not at the forefront.

Instead it’s about how much debt can you service. Are you cutting the size of government? Are you cutting spending? Are you paying attention and doing good things with our money?

I am a Republican and I am supporting Gov. Matt Mead. I think he has done a good job. I think that is the issue: Has he done a good job?

WyoFile: Mead said in Thursday night’s Wyoming PBS debate that he won’t appeal a decision on the case, yet his attorneys commented during the hearing earlier that day that they are hoping for an appeal. What’s your take?

Sen. Simpson: I think it is pretty clear. (Mead) is a lawyer and he knows how the system works. If the court comes down with a decision that he doesn’t agree with, he is going to concur. … If that’s what he said, that’s what he said. It can’t be any clearer than that.

I would be stunned if he said, “It didn’t come out the way I wanted, and I am going to advise my Attorney General to appeal.”

WyoFile: Can you talk about the Republican Unity Coalition, the gay-straight alliance in the GOP that you helped put together in the early 2000s?

Sen. Simpson: We really worked on that. (The group adopted a platform.) It was called the Cody Statement. It talks about the Western philosophy, the right to be left alone, the right of independence, and all the things Wyoming people cherish: Government out of your life. How better to have government out of your life than to just stay out of it?

The precious right of privacy and the right to be left alone, that’s a mantra of Wyoming people: Just don’t bother me. This is what this is all about. You don’t bother me. You live your life. Don’t try to come into my home and try to tell me to live another way.

People who say, “You’re going to fry. You’re going to go to hell,” who is calling those shots? There is a bigger authority out there in the cosmos on that. That doesn’t sell in Wyoming and that is why it (opposing same-sex marriage) will fail in Wyoming. They are failing, and it will fail.

Regardless of what happens in this case, we will have gay marriage in Wyoming this year. That’s my feeling.

Look at Idaho. They are much more rigid about this issue than we are. There are guys there trying to print their own money and get rid of the IRS, and now they’ve got gay marriage.

WyoFile: Can you tell more about the cousins you mentioned?

Medics treat a soldier in France during World War II. Simpson's gay cousin (not shown here) served as a medic in the European theater. (Wikimedia Commons — click to enlarge)
Medics treat a soldier in France during World War II. Simpson’s cousin (not shown here) served as a combat medic in the European theater. (Wikimedia Commons)
Medics treat a soldier in France during World War II. Simpson’s cousin (not shown here) served as a combat medic in the European theater. (Wikimedia Commons)

Sen. Simpson: My cousins were both Wyoming natives. He joined the Army and he was a very wonderful sensitive man, and he became a medic. He was like Abe Lincoln. He said, “I can’t even stand to wring the neck of a chicken.” The Civil War tore Lincoln to bits.

(My cousin) went to Europe, and he got on his hands and knees and tried to close wounds in people’s chests, and held their hand while they died. He put their dog tags in their mouth and waited for grave registration to arrive. He was crawling on the ground under fire and trying to save people’s lives. That’s what he did.

I don’t need anyone to tell me how to judge that man. I don’t think any of us knew that he was gay, and in later life he came out with that, and he was a wonderful man. He had a family, and that’s the way it works.

The other cousin she was a … beautiful woman with red hair, charming, older than I was. She took a music degree, then a master’s degree. She taught in Downer’s Grove, Illinois for years, and I have seen letters from her students saying she was such a wonderful person. And during all those years she had a partner unknown to others because that was not the thing.

Right here in Cody, we had people who lived together in same-sex arrangements back in the early history of the town, and nobody judged them. That’s the way it worked around here anyway.

WyoFile: How does having a gay friend or family member affect people’s views?

Sen. Simpson: They love ‘em. There was a member of the Tea Party here, and I got to know him, and we got to visiting, and he told me about his family, the fact he was from the East and his father and mother had been involved in very right-wing ideologies. And we talked about that.

It was a very pleasant conversation, and he related to me that his brother was gay, and his brother was married in a jurisdiction where he could marry. I said, “How did your folks feel about that?” And he said, “They loved him.”

So there is the breakdown of it. He said, “Of course when they found out, they loved him.” That says it all. They were rigid and not for that lifestyle, but when their son said, “I am, and I’m married,” they loved him.

Former U. S. Sen. Alan Simpson (R) of Cody represented Wyoming in Congress from 1979-1997. Before that, he was a member of the Wyoming House of Representatives from 1965-1977. In 2001 he helped found the Republican Unity Coalition, signing the “Cody Statement” at the Buffalo Bill Historical Center. In 2010 he was appointed co-chairman of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform with Erskine Bowles. Today he is involved with The Common Good, Americans for Campaign Reform, the National Institute for Civil Discourse, and the Commission on Presidential Debates.

For more on this issue, read these WyoFile features:

Wyoming same-sex marriage ban overturned, Mead will not appeal, October 17, 2014.
Judge will rule by 5 p.m. Monday on same-sex marriage in Wyoming, October 16, 2014.
Wyoming’s stalemate on same-sex marriage may break this week, October 14, 2014.
Wyoming same-sex marriage case rests on state constitution, April 8, 2014.
Bills aimed at LGBT equality fail, yet proponents see progress, urge civility, January 29, 2013.
 

Judge Scott Skavdahl’s ruling and stay issued October 17, 2014

Gregory Nickerson

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. “To which Simpson responded: “I’ve spent many years in public life trying to stabilize that system while people like you babble into the vapors about ‘disgusting attempts at ageism and sexism’ and all the rest of that crap.” The response of Simpson after he noted SS is like a cow with 310 tits.
    Is Al of the “entrenched” political class? Recall, Al on the 1986 immigration bills. It is ironic, ex New Yorker Ms Marston giving her thumb’s up to Al.(on WYOFILE).

    Jim Hagood

  2. I’ll be writing in Al Simpson for governor again this year……Just to let you know…….also does anyone else happen to look at the Great Seal of the State of Wyoming and see two dudes gettin’ hitched……betcha do now………..

  3. I’ll be writing in Al Simpson for governor again this year……Just to let you know…….also does anyone else happen to look at the Great Seal of the State of Wyoming and see two dudes gettin’ hitched……betcha do now………..

  4. I appreciate Senator Simpson, and while I am personally against gay marriage, I stand alongside Gov. Mead when he said “This result is contrary to my personal beliefs and those of many others,” Mead’s statement said. “As in all matters, I respect the role of the courts and the ruling of the Court. While this is not the result I and others would have hoped, I recognize people have different points of view and I hope all citizens agree, we are bound by the law.” –
    I believe gay marriage is wrong according to the Bible, but the Bible also says that we are to obey the laws of the land. It’s a difficult place to be in to be the judge who has to make the final decision, but that decision has to be based on law. Based on that, I agree there will be gay marriage in the entire country. Although I, personally, don’t think it’s right, people do have the right and I respect that.

  5. Marriage and/or civil unions are , after all , just a signed contract with the state. The two individuals agree to be one entity for purposes of taxation , property , probate, civil regulations and state laws, blah blah blah. The requisite marriage license is just that …a license. A legal document kept on file at the Courthouse. And THAT is where the state’s involvement ends. No more , no less.

    Anyone can speak their vows before a congregation of their family and friends , or stand under an oak tree as a couple alone, or be quietly joined in a seedy Las Vegas plywood chapel. Ship’s captains, JP’s, wannabe ministers can all play the role of Conjoiner. That is a performance, the fulfillment of your social promise and your promise to your partner at your choice of venues, the tradition , for which the State rightfully cares not one whit. Otherwise people would not likely be allowed to be married in hot air balloons, submarines, or Cessnas.

    The License is separate from the ceremony. The brouhaha over same sex unions was , is, and shall remain a hashing of a legal document. Does the state recognize it?

    Why wouldn’t it ? Sign on the dotted line and pay the $ 25.00 fee…

  6. Sadly the media also gets paid to maximize social wedge issues as well as dysfunctional politics to keep the people at emotional odds. Glad its over. Well said, Al. Next on the menu, fear based environgelic science

  7. Mr. Simpson. I like you so much for deliberately separating yourself from the regressive and oppressive policies that the Republican party have refused to back down from. With that being said, how on earth could you go on record saying you support Mead and will vote for him? His record on equal pay for equal work and deliberate stalling of same-sex marriage make him a huge betrayer of equality. Fiscally, he’s wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars suing the federal government, cost Wyoming millions of dollars in denying Medicaid expansion, and burdened working families with increased taxes on fuel to support the bloated and top-heavy WYDOT. You can’t be in support of progress and fiscal responsibility and Matt Mead at the same time.

  8. Mr. Simpson. I like you so much for deliberately separating yourself from the regressive and oppressive policies that the Republican party have refused to back down from. With that being said, how on earth could you go on record saying you support Mead and will vote for him? His record on equal pay for equal work and deliberate stalling of same-sex marriage make him a huge betrayer of equality. Fiscally, he’s wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars suing the federal government, cost Wyoming millions of dollars in denying Medicaid expansion, and burdened working families with increased taxes on fuel to support the bloated and top-heavy WYDOT. You can’t be in support of progress and fiscal responsibility and Matt Mead at the same time.