Public utilities that add carbon capture technology to coal-fired power plants in Wyoming may increase rates by a maximum 2% to cover the cost, according to rule revisions the Wyoming Public Service Commission adopted Friday.

Utilities may also claim an exemption from the 2020 law that mandates adding carbon capture technologies as a prerequisite to retiring coal-fired power units. Exemptions can be claimed in the instance that an environmental, reliability and economic analysis determines the step unfeasible.

“The public does not want the Wyoming Public Service Commission to pass on a portion of the cost of this expensive and unproven technology to Wyoming ratepayers through surcharges on their utility bills.”

Sylvia Bagdonas, Wyoming ratepayer

The PSC approved the rule revisions as it prepares a regulatory framework to implement HB 200, Reliable and dispatchable low-carbon energy standards, passed in 2020. The regulatory authority has until the end of March to finalize its proposed suite of HB 200 rules.

The commission received dozens of public comments regarding the Chapter 1 and Chapter 3 rule revisions, most of them in favor of allowing for an analysis-based exemption and limited ratepayer liability.

“It is important for you to acknowledge the failed economics of carbon capture throughout the nation,” ratepayer Sylvia Bagdonas of Laramie wrote to the PSC. “The public does not want the Wyoming Public Service Commission to pass on a portion of the cost of this expensive and unproven technology to Wyoming ratepayers through surcharges on their utility bills.”

An economic analysis should also include the benefits of technologies that add coal carbon capture and help prevent the early retirement of coal-fired power plants in Wyoming, according to the Wyoming Coalition of Local Governments.

“The coal-fired electric generation facilities not only provide access to reliable and cost effective generation resources, but also jobs, revenue, and financial stability to both the state of Wyoming and counties where the facilities are located,” WCLG Chairman Eric South wrote in comments to the PSC.

The square pipe in the foreground of this photograph is the largest research bay at the Wyoming Integrated Test Center. It can capture up to roughly 18 megawatts of carbon emissions from the coal-fired Dry Fork power plant for carbon capture research. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

The Wyoming Legislature passed a measure earlier this year that authorizes the PSC to require such analysis, but it’s unclear whether or how it might do so. That provision is not part of the PSC’s HB 200 rulemaking process.

Regulated electric utilities in Wyoming must notify the PSC by the end of March whether they will seek a rate surcharge to implement carbon capture systems.

Wyoming ratepayers could begin paying for carbon capture systems before they are actually applied to a power plant. That provision is in place because financing for coal carbon capture is difficult to find, Powder River Basin Resource Council attorney Shannon Anderson said. 

“The financing piece is not there yet for carbon capture unless, of course, the government foots the bill,” Anderson said. “So here, the ratepayers are going to foot the bill.”

There’s still much to hash out by the March deadline. But what’s clear is that rate increases related to coal carbon capture systems would fall on Wyoming ratepayers alone rather than spread across a utility’s multi-state ratepayer network, Anderson said.

The moon rises over a coal silo at the Dry Fork Mine just north of Gillette. The Dry Fork Mine feeds the Dry Fork Power Station, where the Integrated Test Center hosts carbon capture testing. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

“There’s a provision in the [Rocky Mountain Power multi-state] protocol that allocates costs that are a direct result of choices in state law to the state in which those costs were created,” she said.

Lawmakers have considered a raft of measures over the past three years in an attempt to slow or block plans to retire coal-fired power generation in the state, including another provision that requires a utility to first seek a buyer before it is allowed to retire a coal-burning unit. 

Wyoming’s largest utility, Rocky Mountain Power, plans to decommission its entire coal-fired power fleet across several states by 2039.

The utility plans to retire coal units 1 and 2 at the Naughton power plant near Kemmerer by the end of 2025. Its coal units 1 and 2 at the Jim Bridger plant will be converted to natural gas in 2024, while coal units 3 and 4 are scheduled for decommission in 2037. Its Dave Johnston coal-fired power plant near Glenrock is scheduled for retirement in 2027.

Dustin Bleizeffer

Dustin Bleizeffer is a Report for America Corps member covering energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 22 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily...

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Great job as always Dustin. It certainly does not surprise me that the Wyoming Legislature plans, once again, to steal more money from the Wyoming citizens.

  2. This article once again proves carbon capture is within the realm of politics. These rates are adjusted for an industry that has captured huge profits off all ratepayers. This statement in the article sums it up. “The financing piece is not there yet for carbon capture unless, of course, the government foots the bill,” Anderson said. “So here, the ratepayers are going to foot the bill.” Wow, we have been footing the bills for a long time, and no real improvements to overall electrical generations or grids, just profits.

  3. Thanks for breaking this down. I think carbon capture is one piece of the climate solution but haven’t read much about the economics of it. It’s going to take a lot of effort from a lot of people to make it happen. 2% at a time might just be enough.

    1. Frankly it is a magical fantasy that carbon capture will EVER have any meaningful effect on the ongoing climate destruction, caused 100 % by humans.