A power plant worker. (Angus M. Thuermer, Jr./WyoFile)

Wyoming’s coal industry, which has paid much of the freight for state government and countless Wyoming families for decades, has fallen on hard times.

(BH Imaging)

From a high of 462 million tons in 2011, the state’s production dropped to 324 million tons last year. Large coal company bankruptcies have rocked Wyoming communities, and electric utility giant PacifiCorp has announced plans to retire several coal-plant units in the state early.

Lawmakers and officials, in turn, are scrambling for ways to minimize the damage to Wyoming’s flagship industry and soften the blows to local economies. Are they looking in the right places? 

Whether legislation and policy can ameliorate the pain of economic transition is an open question. To some observers, efforts to save coal are not only futile, they also break with Wyoming’s long championing of free-market conservatism and carry the specter of unintended consequences. What is certain is that things are changing, fast, and that when the whirlwind of economic chaos and legislative reaction settles, Wyoming will be playing by a new set of rules.

WyoFile set out to examine what’s at stake in this special edition, “Re-regulation.”

For this package, three reporters took a step back from the individual elements to examine them collectively and in context. All three stories involve efforts to re-regulate Wyoming’s electric utility system. They looked at moves by state lawmakers to pressure an independent regulatory board to fight for coal. They dug into the nitty gritty of bills currently under consideration, which some worry could lead the state down the path of deregulation and ultimately reorganize the electric utility system. And they chronicled several scenarios proposed for extending the life of coal-plant units, scenarios that would veer sharply from traditional plant uses.  

Guest columnist and UW economist Jason Shogren applies the lens of theory. Economies change and transitions are inevitable, he writes, while acknowledging that such truisms don’t make the choices facing Wyoming any easier or the consequences more palatable. 

Whatever the approach, Shogren notes, making the transition successfully will require hard work, innovation, creative thinking and real economic commitment. 

This is the first of six pieces in WyoFile’s “Re-regulation” special edition. Click the links below to read more:

Old plants, new ideas: Who might buy a retired coal power unit?

The Wyoming PSC’s uncomfortable moment in the spotlight

Chasing coal-plant longevity, bills open door to deregulation

The great coal transition, an economist’s perspective

Regs helped Wyo’s coal industry. Weakening them won’t save it.

Katie Klingsporn reports on outdoor recreation, public lands, education and general news for WyoFile. She’s been a journalist and editor covering the American West for 20 years. Her freelance work has...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *