It was an expensive year to run for office in Wyoming. Super PACs poured in an unprecedented $3.4 million while a few wealthy individuals bankrolled dozens of candidates at the state level. Meanwhile, an open seat in Teton County broke the fundraising record for a statehouse race. 

The increased cash — much of which was spent by out-of-state political action committees — has brought a new dynamic to Wyoming, according to some politicos. 

“This is the dirtiest election I have ever seen in my life in Wyoming,” Secretary of State Karl Allred said during a Joint Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee meeting in October. The committee had been discussing one particular Campbell County PAC who relied on mostly anonymous fundraising to print and circulate voter guides. 

Wyoming was long insulated from national political trends, according to Sabrina King, a lobbyist and political consultant. But that’s changed. 

“I feel like 2022 is the year Wyoming caught up with the rest of the country,” King said in reference to national issues showing up in local races and the cost of running for office. “I think this is the end of inexpensive legislative races.” 

In keeping with historical trends, executive branch races continued to be much costlier than those for the Legislature. Gov. Mark Gordon spent the most on any 2022 statewide race at about $848,000.  

Super PACs

Rep. Liz Cheney spent nearly $13 million on an unsuccessful re-election campaign, according to Federal Election Commission records, while Harriet Hageman spent just over $5 million. Though only a fraction of overall spending, super PACs poured nearly $3.4 million into Wyoming for the 2022 election. The previous super PAC record was $423,000 in 2018, according to FEC records. 

Unlike conventional political action committees, super PACS cannot directly coordinate with or donate to political candidates or parties. Instead, they have the ability to raise and spend unlimited funds to advocate for or against candidates and issues. 

Wyoming Values — based in Georgia — was responsible for about a quarter of super PAC spending in the state, dropping about $877,000 on text messaging, media ads and mailers in support of Hageman and opposing Cheney. 

Most of the 2022 super PAC spending in Wyoming was on the U.S. House race — with about 60% favoring Hageman — but not all. Two super PACs — Western Conservatives and True West PAC, INC. — spent more than a combined $408,000 on legislative races. True West dumped roughly $53,000 on the Senate District 1 race, supporting incumbent Sen. Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower) and opposing challenger Rep. Bill Fortner (R-Gillette). 

“[They] just destroyed not only my campaign, pretty much my name around Campbell County,” Fortner told the corporations committee in October. “I will never run for another office anywhere in the State of Wyoming.”

Fortner lost to Driskill in the primary election and Driskill went on to win in the general election. Driskill condemned the actions of the super PAC. 

Voters fill out ballots at the Restoration Church polling center in Casper on Nov. 8, 2022. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Legislature

Separate from super PAC spending, Driskill had one of the more expensive races for the Legislature, spending roughly $50,000. Bob Ide was the only Senate candidate to spend more — his campaign spent more than $58,000 on a successful bid to oust incumbent Sen. Drew Perkins (R-Casper). 

However, the record-breaker for fundraising was in the House. Republican Paul Vogelheim spent roughly $73,000 of the more than $111,000 he raised in the race for House District 23. He lost to Democrat Liz Storer, who spent approximately $68,000. (Storer is the president and CEO of the George B. Storer Foundation, a financial supporter of WyoFile.) The seat was up for grabs after Rep. Andy Schwartz (D-Jackson) did not seek reelection. 

Sen. Affie Ellis (R-Cheyenne) was the previous record holder for fundraising with almost $84,000 in 2020. As for spending, Vogelheim just barely spent more than the previous record holder — Britney Wallesch with approximately $74,000 in 2020. 

“I think there are certain places in the state now where unless you can raise an excruciatingly large amount of money, you’re out,” King said, pointing to Teton County as one example. 

Expensive campaigns, however, don’t guarantee a win. King pointed to Marcy Kindred’s campaign, which outraised incumbent Sen. Stephan Pappas (R-Cheyenne) by a significant margin. Kindred lost by about 800 votes. 

Wealthy bankrollers

Several candidates largely self-funded their campaigns. But some competitors were bankrolled by a handful of wealthy Wyoming residents. 

In recent years, Dan and Carleen Brophy of Jackson have taken to funding Republican candidates that consider themselves “anti-establishment” or “anti-RINO,” meaning Republican in name only. The couple spent about $158,000 this election cycle, almost entirely on primary election candidates. 

B. Wayne Hughes Jr., of the Hughes Charitable Foundation and owner of the Cowboy State Daily, spent $300,000 to fund Wyoming Hope, a political action committee. The PAC backed moderate Republicans, many of which were incumbents. 

Charles Jan Gray, father to Rep. Chuck Gray (R-Casper), spent the highest amount on Wyoming’s 2022 elections. The elder Gray spent $700,000 on his son’s successful run for secretary of state. Wyoming statute limits how much individuals can donate to statewide campaigns to $2,500 and $1,500 to non-statewide races. However, there are no limits on direct contributions from immediate family members, such as parents. 

Apart from the Republicans, political parties in Wyoming lack the same kind of fundraising powerhouses, according to King. “The Democratic Party has been consistently losing and they have no equivalent donor on their hands who will just bankroll candidates,” King said. 

Maggie Mullen

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. To think that dark or insider/stakeholder money isn’t paying for evangelic or environgelic extremism/bias in politics and the media is absurd. This is just one snap-shot of a downhill spiraling political system formally known as the great democracy. To ignore is bliss.

  2. “Charles Jan Gray, father to Rep. Chuck Gray (R-Casper), spent the highest amount on Wyoming’s 2022 elections. The elder Gray spent $700,000 on his son’s successful run for secretary of state.”

    I am not sure why Chuck Gray ran for office. The money doesn’t pencil out if Dad treats $700,000 like nickles for gumball machine. Chuck doesn’t need the job. Maybe he’s eyeing much higher office. And if you truly love Wyoming, wouldn’t you want dad spending that kind of money helping social service non-profits, or a young Wyoming entrepreneur?

    I wanna talk to that guy. Something smells funny.

  3. Sounds to me like a good argument for campaign finance reform legislation. I would favor a limit on all national, all state and all local elections and rely more on debates for candidates to get their messages out. However, with this situation that the ones who would make this change are the ones that write the rules, little chance, I fear. With Citizens United and the current US Supreme Court, I see little chance of something like this happening until there’s a Democratic supermajority in both the House and Senate and control of the White House. I suspect that the same holds true for immigration reform and a real concerted effort at climate change remediation.

  4. Excellent, well-researched article & important. Cheney’s loss unificares that funding isn’t everything. Thanks Maggie.

  5. the democrats have plenty of super donors.
    georgey soros is 1 name that come to mind.
    then there is billy gates & who can forget geoffrey bezos.
    all multi billionaires who support democratic & liberal causes.

    i guess they would rather spend their money in some of the more run down parts of the country ?

    1. This is a response to Paul Burke. Not many states are anywhere near abandoned as our beloved Wyoming. Republican super contributors outnumber Democrat super contributors substantially. None of those Republicans spent a dime on Wyoming.