Union Pacific reported that its coal transportation out of the southern Powder River Basin was up 8 percent in 2010 as the economy continued to make gains and utilities replenished their coal stockpiles. Its coal deliveries from Colorado and Utah were down 14 percent in 2010.

It’s another sign that despite shifting policies and markets, Wyoming coal producers continue hold their own.

While the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement predicts that its proposed new rules protecting streams would likely cut production (and an estimated 7,000 mining jobs) from many coal-producing regions — eastern U.S. mountaintop mining, in particular — it may result in production increases in Wyoming, Montana and North Dakota.

Wyoming coal producers appear to be dodging another bullet.

In recent years, U.S. utilities have installed scrubbers to control smog on about one-third of the coal-fired power plant fleet. That means Powder River Basin coal no longer enjoys favor among utilities for its low-sulfur content. It was this low-sulfur content that convinced eastern utilities to switch away from higher-Btu content eastern coals. They railed in Powder River Basin coal from hundreds of miles away to meet lower sulfur dioxide emission standards put in place in the early 1990s to combat acid rain.

Naturally, there’s some concern among Powder River Basin producers that eastern utilities will tap coal resources closer to home that have higher Btu content and lower transportation costs. But there’s not been a great deal of coal-switching. Each coal-fired unit must be carefully dialed-in to the specific blend of coal it burns. Switching coal sources and recalibrating these units is not easy or inexpensive.

Besides, those eastern coal producers are eager to sell their coal overseas.

As further evidence of rapidly changing fossil fuel markets, Consol Energy announced this week it expects the company’s natural gas production in the Marcellus shale will decline this year due to low pricing and “increased permitting and regulatory risks.” Consol also said it anticipates strong revenues from selling metallurgical coal into a tightening global market.

In fact, natural gas producers are taking notice of overseas markets, too. Last week, the Kansas City Star reported that some gas producers are considering exports as a way to balance a burgeoning new supply in the U.S.

Contact Dustin Bleizeffer at 307-577-6069 or dustin@wyofile.com.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *