The Wyoming Senate at work during the 2023 legislative session in Cheyenne. (Megan Lee Johnson/WyoFile)

Wyoming’s legislative session is often a study in contrasts. 

Opinion

On one hand, we see our legislators try to solve complicated issues in thoughtful ways. We see them attempt to balance the views and interests of diverse constituencies. We see them engage in meaningful debate aimed at reaching the best solution. Moments like these make me proud to be in Wyoming and represented by a citizen legislature. 

This session, the Legislature has no shortage of important issues to tackle. Our state’s education funding system needs serious attention, for example, and legislators have considered bills proposing solutions to the looming problem. Similarly, our Legislature has spent a great deal of time over the years, including this session, considering whether to expand Medicaid in our state. There are legitimate arguments on both sides of the issue and debating and voting on this matter is a quality use of our Legislature’s time. Of course, many bills can and should fail, but that does not mean the effort is worthless. Our Legislature has taken on other crucial issues with bills that address genuine problems in a thoughtful way. 

Despite the Legislature’s good work, however, there are also a number of silly, poorly thought out or downright malicious bills being considered. For example, one bill introduced in the Legislature would ban forced implantation of microchips in employees. While I doubt many people would argue in favor of forced microchipping, this is not a worthwhile use of time. There are no businesses microchipping their employees and no businesses have expressed any interest in doing so. This bill certainly falls under the “silly” category. It is a complete waste of time that addresses a nonexistent problem. Yet, the Wyoming Senate decided to consider, debate and vote on this bill. Hopefully the House shows better judgment.

Other bills not worth the Legislature’s time include those dealing with refugee resettlement plans, requiring that participation in events at the state fair be counted as an “excused absence” at school, and establishing a “federal review” committee. As to the refugee resettlement plan bill, Wyoming has no refugee resettlement plan. We do not have the refugee populations that other states have. This is another bill that wastes time addressing an issue that is not a genuine problem. On the state fair issue, given the real issues facing our state, is it really worth the Legislature’s time nitpicking with school districts over excused versus unexcused absences? Clearly it is not. 

The “federal review” committee bill may be the worst of all. Not only is it a waste of time now, it promises to be a waste of time for years to come. First, it aims to create a new committee with the charge to review “all federal action.” I suspect that the sponsor of this bill is woefully ignorant of just what that would entail. The Code of Federal Regulations is changed or amended daily. There can be hundreds of regulatory amendments in a week, and that is just one aspect of federal action. Thousands of lawyers spend their careers evaluating these regulations, but this committee of a handful of part-time Wyoming lawmakers would be tasked with reviewing it in a legislative setting. 

Perhaps the worst part of this bill is that it instructs the committee to ignore any holdings of the Supreme Court. There is one institution that has been charged with interpreting the United States Constitution since our nation was founded — the United States Supreme Court. This bill asks the Legislature to ignore centuries of thought and interpretation of our Constitution while reviewing thousands upon thousands of federal acts, and to what end? This bill wins the award for worst of the session. While I have learned not to judge intentions, I certainly have doubts about the good judgment of the bill’s sponsors.

All of this is to say that we must keep a close eye on what is happening in our Legislature. Good bills and efforts to solve real problems should be applauded. Legislative grandstanding, time wasting and poor judgment should be called out for what they are: an affront to the people of Wyoming who depend on the Legislature to make informed decisions on real issues.

Cheyenne attorney Khale Lenhart is a former chairman of the Laramie County Republican Party. He can be reached at khale.lenhart@gmail.com

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *