In 1925, the Tennessee Legislature passed the Butler Act, which made it unlawful for any teacher in the state’s public schools and universities “to teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.” Meant to stop teachers from introducing Charles Darwin’s work on evolution to their students, the bill mandated that “offending teachers be fined between $100 and $500 for each offense.” In 2025 dollars, that’s a fine of slightly less than $2,000 to $10,000. 

Opinion

Shortly after the bill became law, John Scopes, a high school teacher in Dayton, Tennessee, agreed to serve as the criminal defendant in a test case to be focused on the constitutional protections of freedom of speech. But things went sideways fast. Three-time presidential candidate and former Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan volunteered his services for the prosecution saying, “Teachers in the public schools must teach what the taxpayers desire taught.” Clarence Darrow, who was the most famous criminal lawyer of the period, volunteered to direct the defense with his team saying, “The question is not whether evolution is true or untrue, but involves the freedom of teaching, or more important, the freedom of learning.”

Over 200 reporters came to town along with 3,000 spectators. Merchants decorated their shops with pictures of apes and monkeys. The local drugstore offered Simian Sodas and the town constable affixed a sign to his motorcycle reading “Monkeyville Police.” Everyone agreed it would be the trial of the century.

Among those present that summer was a young Black fiddler and mandolinist named Howard Armstrong. Born in Dayton in 1909, the 16-year-old musician was busking on the streets throughout the trial. Seventy-five years later, at 91 and a recipient of the National Heritage Award, Armstrong came to Wyoming, where he performed and taught workshops for adults and students. He told me that it was when all those people were in Dayton for the trial that he began to play music of many kinds — Irish, Italian, Polish, Mexican. Later, living in Chicago, he translated English lyrics to sing in Chinese. “You had to play for everybody if you wanted to make a living,” he said.

Another musician influenced by the trial was Uncle Dave Macon, a white banjo player. In 1926, he recorded “The Bible Song,” one verse of which declares, “Evolution teaches man came from a monkey. I don’t believe in no such a thing in a day of the week or Sunday. For the Bible’s true. Yes, I believe it. I’ve seen enough, and I can prove it. What you say, what you say, it’s bound to be that way.”

While the Scopes trial had a comic carnival-like atmosphere, it was deadly serious business — the first battle in our now hundred-year-long culture wars. It took place in a time of social upheaval and dislocation — the aftermath of World War I and the global flu epidemic, widespread anti-immigrant sentiment, the arrest and imprisonment of people for criticizing then-President Woodrow Wilson, the round up and deportation of suspected socialists, anarchists and communists.

It’s unnerving how much this sounds like our situation now — ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, the aftereffects of the Covid-19 Pandemic, the U.S. president’s attacks on his critics, and ignoring due process, his order to murder suspected drug traffickers in international waters. Along with these, we’re experiencing a rise in anti-immigrant sentiment fueled by the rise in global migration that is itself fueled by war, climate change, ethnic and racial conflict, and by ordinary intractable poverty in the face of unimaginable wealth. Think of Elon Musk with over $500 billion.

Just as the 1925 Tennessee Legislature passed a law to control access to what was then a controversial book, so has the 2025 Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Judiciary Committee voted 11-2 to introduce a bill mandating that public and school libraries keep “sexually explicit” material inaccessible to people under 18. Perhaps not surprisingly, the bill does not appear to be aimed at what people often call pornography. Rather, it’s to keep LGBTQ+ materials out of the reading view of young people seeking to understand themselves and the society they will both inherit and shape.

Tennessee’s 1925 Butler Act banning the teaching of evolution and Wyoming’s 2025 proposed bill to limit young people’s access to materials exploring human development and personal identity are misguided and, in the long run will not attain their goals, neither those that are stated nor those that remain unspoken. 1925 to 2025 — a hundred years. I hope we evolve beyond such legislation before another hundred pass.

After 10 years teaching in Artist-in-Schools programs throughout the western United States, David Romtvedt served for 22 years as a professor at the University of Wyoming.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Did I miss something? David’s editorial wasn’t a debate about chromosomes, body types, or dysphoria, but about thought control–what to think, or speak… or not.. Oh well, with A.I. on the scene homo sapiens will soon be in thrall to its own creation, ceding the necessity of thinking at all. Who hires the piper, calls the tune.

  2. Evolution is obviously either a painfully slow, or an intellectually elusive endeavor for follicly challenged primates. 100 years of debate and introspection and some of us still cannot resist the urge to continue to drag our knuckles through the mud or fling poo at each other…

  3. When social contagion is influencing children to believe they are something they physically aren’t, parents and communities that have common sense are going to try and stop what is deluding the children.
    Tying this argument to religion works for further polarization and closed minds, but when SCIENCE is applied your Scopes example it has actually been turned 180 degrees with what today’s issue is.
    It is a simple as XX and XY, and which side is now the “science deniers”? It’s not the ones being labeled as religious zealots.

    1. I am not sure what social contagion is. Is that what you call it when people share their experiences? I have never experienced body dysmorphia myself. I don’t really get it, but that does not mean other people’s experiences are invalid. I am a mom. My greatest hope is that my child accepts others and treats them with kindness, even when she does not have much in common with them. I am not afraid of what she might read at the library. I am afraid that her generation does not read enough. I am tired of professionals like teachers and librarians being bullied by politicians, and used as clickbait for propagandists.

    2. “It is a simple as XX and XY..”

      We all wish for things to be simple and clear, but they are often not. To mention one situation, a human embryo that is XY will not develop into a male is if that embryo has a syndrome termed androgen insensitivity. It will produce male hormones (testosterone), but it does not have receptors for the hormones. Without the receptors, the body will not develop male traits like normal testes and greater muscle mass. They appear to be female.
      In cases like this, it’s not useful for a government, a political party, or a religious groups to proclaim it’s as simple as XX and XY. Life can get messy.

      1. What you just mentioned is 1 in 20-100 thousand. Extremely rare.

        What I am talking about is social contagion, where half a class of 6th grade girls now thinks it’s cool to be trans. I have friends and relatives that have experienced this with their children in multiple different areas of the country.
        The kids are also conditioned to threaten suicide if the parents dont go along with the nonsense.

        Actual physical anomalies like you mention are extremely rare compared to the psychological conditioning that young people are being exposed to in the relatively new “protect trans kids” world.

        1. No wonder students come out of college brainwashed if David is an example of the professors (even at The University of Wyoming) who are teaching there. Very sad example of someone who is supposed to be educating not forcing their personal ideals on students