Then Senate President Drew Perkins (R-Casper) and Speaker of the House Steve Harshman (R-Casper) at the start of the 2019 Legislative session. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

Despite the early endorsement of Republican leadership, property and sales tax bills appear dead in the water at the end of the third week of the 2019 legislative session.

Speaker of the House Steve Harshman (R-Casper) and Senate President Drew Perkins (R-Casper) entered the session saying they supported an effort to broaden the state’s sales tax. They wanted to “modernize” the tax to cover many previously untaxed services, remove some exemptions, including groceries, while also lowering the sales tax rate by a half percent.

Harshman also said he wanted to see debate on a bill to raise property taxes for public education.

But for three weeks, the sales tax bill sat in committee without a public hearing and the property tax bill was not assigned to any committee. By Friday morning it seemed both efforts were aground.

House Bill 67 – Sales tax revisions sought to raise money for local governments by broadening the sales tax to include a host of previously exempted products and untaxed services. To make the bill more palatable to the tax-wary Wyoming Legislature, the bill also lowered the overall sales tax rate by a half percent.

But in a Friday morning news conference, Harshman said the bill may not get a public hearing this session because there is little appetite for it on the House floor.

House Bill 68 – School funding revenue, which would raise property taxes to fund education, probably won’t be assigned to a committee either, Harshman said. Sponsored by the Joint Revenue Committee, HB68 would have raised $68 million a year for public schools by 2022.

“I just don’t think we’re there,” the speaker said.

Death of a sales tax

Prior to the session, Perkins and Harshman both backed the sales tax initiative, calling it an effort to “modernize” the state’s tax structure in order to collect revenues from the diversified economy Wyoming policy makers seek to build. They pitched the bill as “broadening and lowering”  the sales tax, as opposed to a mere tax increase.

House Bill 67 would have raised $33 million a year for local governments by removing exemptions on the purchase of food, manufacturing equipment and equipment for data processing centers.

Harshman assigned the bill to the House Appropriations Committee, whose chairman, Bob Nicholas (R-Cheyenne), is an ally of the speaker. The bill was set for a hearing the evening of Jan. 22, but Nicholas tabled its discussion.

The bill was not put back on the committee’s schedule, and discussions moved behind closed doors and into huddled off-record conversations on chamber floors, out of public hearing.

Through a spokesperson for the Republican caucus, Nicholas declined to comment on the bill’s status on Thursday. On Friday, Harshman didn’t completely rule out a hearing on the bill, but said it seemed unlikely as its supporters struggled to rally the votes they would need on the House floor or in the Senate.

“I think the committee is still kinda pondering and working it,” Harshman said. “I don’t know if the bill’s going to make it, to be honest with you, or if they’re even going to take it up.”  

On the Senate side, Perkins said senators had expressed disinterest in the bill in closed-door Republican caucus.

“I know where enough people stand that I don’t think it will pass,” Perkins said. “It’s only fair to let the House know so they don’t have to have that battle just to have it come down here and fail.”

Without public discussion, it’s not clear what made the bill unpalatable for lawmakers despite leadership’s support. The Senate wouldn’t back the bill without the provision lowering the sales tax from 4 to 3.5 percent, which the bill currently includes, Perkins said.

“If it doesn’t lower, then I think it’s simply a tax raising bill,” Perkins said.

If House proponents had sought to push the bill without that provision, the suggestion was made behind closed doors. Another House Appropriations Committee member, Rep. Tom Walters (R-Casper), told WyoFile he didn’t know what was being done with the bill on Thursday, suggesting Nicholas was running the bill.

Harshman implied that the number of previously untaxed services — and therefore constituencies — that would have faced a sales tax under the bill doomed it. “You’re trying to bring in 60, 70, 80 more services,” he said, “you’ve probably got 60, 70, 80 more no votes.”

With no evident appetite for the bill on the House floor, Harshman said, you might as well table the topic for study during the period between sessions.

“You spend all your time on something that maybe we can just work on in the interim,” he said.

The sales tax bill was sponsored by the Joint Revenue Committee, which studied the topic during the last interim. That committee also sponsored the property tax bill.

Support in-depth legislative coverage with a tax deductible donation

Andrew Graham is reporting for WyoFile from Laramie. He covers state government, energy and the economy. Reach him at 443-848-8756 or at, follow him @AndrewGraham88

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The ideological rigidity of the Wyoming Republican party is revealed ever more clearly. Were I a young family, wanting to settle somewhere and looking for

    1. wide open spaces,
    2. small towns with strong communities,
    3. a well-developed cyber infrastructure,
    4. good schools supported by a progressive state tax structure,
    5. and perhaps most importantly, like-minded representatives,

    I’d pass on Wyoming pretty quickly. While property and sales tax increases are not the way to beckon young families, their failure to even be heard is a sad commentary on the blindness of our legislature to the 21st century world.

    This legislature continues to drive us to some sort of crisis where future legislatures will grind their teeth at their predecessors inability to think and act creatively.

  2. This is Wyoming. We love to study things, then study them again the next year, and the next. It gives the appearance of relevancy to a body that refuses to consider real problems and instead likes to harass pregnant women and people who want to save the planet from global warming. Sigh. I had hoped that the initial commitment by leadership to work on real problems would become reality, but it looks like it will be another session devoted mostly to culture war nonsense.