More than 47,000 people, organizations and agencies have taken the time to send in their thoughts on federal wildlife managers’ Biden-era proposal to continue classifying grizzly bears as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. 

It’s a decision that attracts so much interest because it closes, or opens, the door for grizzly bear hunting. The scores of folks wanting to weigh in on future management of the iconic, though controversial, large carnivores faced a fast-approaching deadline Monday. On Friday, however, the Fish and Wildlife Service — now under the Trump administration — quietly pushed back the cutoff for comments.

The change was made public in a notice posted Friday online in the Federal Register. The new deadline is May 16.

Fish and Wildlife Service officials, who couldn’t be reached immediately, haven’t yet publicized the extension. It caught even some environmental advocacy groups that closely track grizzly bear issues by surprise. 

“I would expect that we will see more obfuscation and not a lot of transparency out of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service about this decision,” Wyoming Wildlife Advocates Executive Director Kristin Combs told WyoFile. “We’re all waiting to see what happens and waiting to see what the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service does.” 

It’s widely expected that the Trump administration’s Fish and Wildlife Service will reel back the early January proposal, which came when it did because of a court order. Doug Burgum, the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, told Montana Sen. Steve Daines, a Republican, during his confirmation hearing, “I’m with you” on the grizzly issue.  

“We should be celebrating when species come off the endangered species list,” Burgum said during the hearing, “as opposed to fighting every way we can to try and keep them on that list.”

The Trump administration’s pick to lead the Fish and Wildlife Service, former Wyoming Game and Fish Department Director Brian Nesvik, has also been an advocate of the states managing grizzlies.  

Another potential path forward that could convey jurisdiction over grizzly bears from the federal to state governments would be “delisting” via an act of Congress. U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman has brought a bill that would do just that, with favorable odds in the 119th Congress, which includes Republican majorities in both chambers. 

During a Thursday town hall-style meeting in Afton, Wyoming’s lone Congressional representative told Star Valley residents about that effort.

U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman listens to a member of her audience during a March 2025 town hall-style meeting in Afton. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

“In my opinion, the Endangered Species Act is a good law,” Hageman said. “But if a species has been recovered, we should not be spending our limited resources on that species.”

The population recovery goal of 500 grizzlies in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, where she spoke, has been surpassed for more than two decades.

As part of a legal settlement with the state of Idaho, the Fish and Wildlife Service must complete its rulemaking related to grizzly bears by January 2026. 

Mike Koshmrl reports on Wyoming's wildlife and natural resources. Prior to joining WyoFile, he spent nearly a decade covering the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem’s wild places and creatures for the Jackson...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The GYE reached grizzly saturation over a decade ago.
    Saturation: the state or process that occurs when no more of something can be absorbed, combined with, or added.

    Stories reporting “record” grizzly mortality are an annual occurrence. The bears have run out of suitable habitat.

    The time has come to open a managed grizzly hunting season in the GYE. For the bears own good. When a deer population is overpopulated and animals are starving to death, it isn’t time to “protect” their numbers.

    Reply