Speculators have struck gold (aka taxpayer gushing subsidies) again.  How do they pull this off over and over?

First, about a decade ago, the promoters of the proposed Two Elk power plant in southern Campbell County persuaded county and state officials to dedicate a huge portion of the state’s eligibility for tax exempt low interest revenue bonds totalling $445-million  to the project, which to meet federal requirements they dubbed a “solid waste recylcling and disposal facility.” (see earlier WyoFile story on this subject)

Next, the project received permits to construct from the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality.

Next, the owners got extensions of time on various bonds and permits.

Next, they built a highway to nowhere; this is apparently to be taken as evidence that this speculative venture might actually be built.  There is actually pavement out there, leading to sagebrush flats.

Meanwhile the project has no nearby market, no ready ability to transmit any power which it might generate and, despite the state’s largesse, is still struggling to find financing.

Environmentalists can relax; this plant is not generating greenhouse gases, although its promoters are.

Many in Campbell County think it’s dead.  Unalterable Fact:  Public utilities, not promoters,  usually build power plants.

The University of Wyoming, with documented expertise and talented faculty, has received a federal stimulus grant of five million dollars to study feasibility of carbon sequestration in geologic formations.  Whoopee!!  Great news!!

But, I gasped as I read it, Two Elk ALSO received a five million dollar federal grant to study, it appears, the SAME THING!!   At the barren site where the power plant is NOT being built; in the absence of a power plant, it has been re-christened the Two Elk Energy Park.  Nothing like the smell of stimulus dollars in the morning.

One Brad Enzi, formerly of Gillette, serves as vice president of  Colorado-based North American Power Group, the Two Elk promoter/owner.  Hmm, does his last name rhyme with another famous name?

Contacted in Cheyenne, Enzi-the-son denied that the Two Elk Power Plant is a failed project. Enzi said his employer, North American Power Group, is still working on “bulk financing” to make the power plant happen. He said that North American Power Group has even applied to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality for a permit to burn bio mass from beetle kill trees in the plant should it ever be built.

Enzi said the sequestration study, which he said covers a larger area of the Powder River Basin than just the Two Elk site, is not a federal liferaft thrown to the much-delayed power plant.

“The Two Elk Energy Park sequestration project ,” said Enzi, “is separate from the Two elk power plant.  By working with researchers from Stanford University and the Montana university system, we hope to gain a better understanding of the underground storage potential of the entire region through this sequestration project. Although work continues to make the  make the Two Elk plant happen, it is entirely seperate from the sequestration project.”

Meanwhile, taxpayers, the Two Elk Energy Park, a figment of some promoters’ imagination, about as much an energy experiment station as my back yard, is getting just under $5 million in stimulus money to massage words into attractive investment schemes.

Read this junk:  http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0001997.pdf.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *