WyoFile Energy Report

Utility wants to convert Wyoming coal unit to natural gas

Due to the increasing cost of scrubbing pollution from coal-fired power plants and the increasing availability of cheap natural gas, PacifiCorp (which operates as Rocky Mountain Power in Wyoming) plans to convert one-third of its Naughton power plant in western Wyoming to natural gas.

It’s part of a growing national trend, but one that particularly stings here in Wyoming — America’s coal supply powerhouse. Wyoming supplies more than 40 percent of the nation’s coal. Pending regulatory rules to curb greenhouse gas emissions (still years away for existing coal units) is only a minor consideration, according to utility officials.

“The cost differential between emission controls (for coal) and converting (to natural gas) is significant. It’s a better deal for customers,” Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) spokesman Dave Eskelsen told WyoFile.

Exactly how much of a savings, RMP officials aren’t saying.

Natural gas consumption by region 1980-2010

Blame the quantum leap in drilling and completion technology (chiefly hydraulic fracturing — or fracking) for a glut of shale gas in the U.S. market. Natural gas is now barely above $2 per thousand cubic feet (mcf), a basement level price not seen since 2002. It is this free-fall in natural gas pricing — and an outlook that it will linger in the basement — that has greatly accelerated what had been a slow march away from coal among U.S. utilities.

Naughton’s “Unit 3” is the latest chip to fall in a cascade of coal unit retirements and fuel switching that is expected to result in a 10 percent decrease in coal consumption among U.S. utilities this year alone, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. RMP, Wyoming’s largest regulated utility, announced years ago it had removed coal from its list of new facilities planning — despite a forecast for steadily increasing electrical demand in the region.

To meeting the demand, RMP expects slightly more hydro-electric and renewable sources in its portfolio of fuels. Coal will continue to lose its share of RMP’s portfolio, while there’s a major push for gains in efficiency, said Rita Meyer, vice president of RMP’s Wyoming division.

Top 8 Coal Producing States

The 700-megawatt Naughton coal-fired power plant was constructed in 1963, and consists of three units. RMP officials say the plant will not lose any of its electrical generating capacity by switching to natural gas, and the company says it is gaining a lot of experience in making such conversions.

The current proposal to convert Unit 3 at Naughton is part of an ongoing rate case. The math driving it has little to do with future rulemakings by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to curb carbon dioxide emissions. And Naughton is among the existing fleet of coal-fired power plants exempt from EPA’s March rulemaking limiting the volume of CO2 allowed from power plant smokestacks. That rule applies only to new power facilities.

It simply costs too much, according to RMP, to add scrubbers on coal units to meet more stringent standards for nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides and particulate matter. The company estimates that by 2014 it will have retrofitted 16 coal units across its service area in the West at a cost of more than $1 billion. And it’s been a major source of irritation for customers.

“We looked at a lot of inputs in making that decision (to convert Unit 3 to natural gas),” said Meyer. “Certainly, in today’s environment, converting to natural gas was the best decision.”

The shift from coal to natural gas provides for an interesting dynamic in Wyoming. Wyoming is the nation’s largest coal producer, and it is among the largest natural gas producers as well.

The biggest utility customers in Wyoming  are in the business of extracting and refining minerals, and the biggest customer in those sectors is natural gas. Wyoming Energy Industrial Consumers, representing major natural gas producers, has intervened in RMP’s recent rate cases, carefully scrutinizing RMP’s choices to make certain rate hikes are justified and minimized.

Wyoming State Geological Services

It’s also the industry that stands to gain the most in the current national shift from coal to natural gas. And the plot thickens. Natural gas producers in the Pinedale Anticline and Jonah gas fields want to steadily increase drilling operations, but they’re up against an existing non-attainment designation in the Upper Green River Basin (the Naughton power plant resides just upwind of the basin) for emissions that have helped trigger dangerous winter ozone spikes.

Their pitch to squeeze new drilling operations into the existing air emissions in the region? More electricity and less natural gas and diesel to power field operations. EnCana Oil & Gas USA says it’s shopping for 20 megawatts of electricity to power its proposed Normally Pressured Lance field surrounding the existing Jonah gas field. Naturally, EnCana must look to RMP as a potential supplier.

Wyoming politicians have operated under the failed notion that Americans will simply ignore climate change just to preserve the burning of Wyoming coal. But using more natural gas because it’s cleaner (at least at the smokestack) and more affordable — that’s something they get behind. Natural gas has even found an eager partner in wind energy. It will make for many interesting and awkward legislative sessions over the next few years.

Contact Dustin Bleizeffer at 307-577-6069 or dustin@wyofile.com.

If you enjoyed this column and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *