U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack addresses trail workers in Jackson on Thursday as he called on Congress for a better funding source for firefighting. The current system frequently eats into the U.S. Forest Service budget and prevents the agency from doing its job, he said. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

JACKSON — U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said his agencies can be “better partners” with states, but that the federal government won’t divest western land holdings.

Vilsack spoke at a trailhead where an AmeriCorps crew was rerouting the popular Putt-Putt hiking and cycling route. He said he understands the challenges faced by Wyoming where 48 percent of the land is federally owned.

Yet the forest around him “is indeed a national treasure,” to be shared with all Americans, he said. The Bridger-Teton National Forest’s Snow King Mountain framed him on one side, the heavily used Cache Creek Canyon on the other.

“I don’t think I’d be in favor of abdicating — turning over — that [management] responsibility,” he told a group of trail workers, including a team from the Bridger-Teton. “I’m not prepared to say ‘Here’s the deed, governor.’ That’s not going to happen.”

Vilsack used ski areas and the fees they pay as an example of why some westerners feel left out of policy matters involving their own backyards. Ski area fees go to Washington, but by law they’re not reinvested in the places where they were collected.

“The current system doesn’t allow that,” Vilsack said.

Fighting fires and climate change

As he and U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell mingled with trail crews, they also addressed questions about climate change and forest fires. Vilsack reiterated a call to Congress for better emergency firefighting funding.

The current firefighting system requires the U.S. Forest Service to dig into its operating budget in big fire years. The largest 2 percent of fires should be considered natural disasters and should be covered by a separate, emergency account, he said.

Fully 70,000 communities and 45 million homes are in the wildland-urban interface where wildfires threaten, Vilsack said. Today, one community in California was evacuated because of fire, one of 23,000 that have started so far this year, he said.

Firefighting costs take away from restoration projects and even from programs that help reduce fire risk, Vilsack said. Yet it’s important to keep American forests healthy, Tidwell added, because they capture 14 percent of the CO2 generated in the country. That, in turn, ameliorates fire-causing climate change, Tidwell said.

“The first thing we can do is make sure we maintain and restore our national forests,” Tidwell said of the climate challenge

The Forest Service is trying to plan for the warmer future, he said. But he didn’t embrace a recent paper that predicted a likely chance of Yellowstone-area forests being denuded by wildfires by the middle of the century.

The Coming Climate cited a peer-reviewed 2011 study that said conifers would likely be replaced by grassland and shrubland. Tidwell said he was not familiar with the Teton County report but agreed some species of conifers are in trouble.

“Are we going to be able to maintain whitebark pine?” he asked. Americans can expect “different mixes of conifers,” especially in southern, forested regions, Tidwell said. “Some of the species we see today are going to change.”

Nevertheless, “50 years from now we’re still going to have a forest environment,” he said of the Yellowstone area. There may be more open meadows, he said.

A Montana Conservation Corps Crew listens to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack while taking a break from a project on the Bridger-Teton National Forest near Jackson. Crew members get about $1,000 a month for their summer-long jobs. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)
A Montana Conservation Corps Crew listens to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack while taking a break from a project on the Bridger-Teton National Forest near Jackson. Crew members get about $1,000 a month for their summer-long jobs. (Angus M. Thuermer Jr./WyoFile)

Tidwell’s agency is focused on rapid restoration of burned areas that need help, among other efforts. The issues extends beyond the federal holdings, however.

“It’s got to be economically viable for someone to keep forests on their private land,” Tidwell said. Novel approaches are needed, like a new method that’s been developed to laminate small-diameter trees into large beams. That could make hazard-fuel reduction more viable.

Tidwell and Vilsack chatted extensively with the trail workers. Members of an AmeriCorps crew from Montana each get about $1,000 a month and will work through October.

“We camp out and I don’t have to share a motel room,” said Amanda Garant, a member of the Montana Conservation Corps whose leather gloves were worn through. “I’m just so grateful for the trail system. I’m proud of it every day.”

Tidwell said he likes talking with the workers. Even in the midst of the Yellowstone ecosystem where trout beckon, he’s more refreshed from learning from his team than he is from hiking in the backcountry.

“To be able to listen to them, that’s my fun,” he said.

See related story — Vilsack touts fed’s rural aid.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *