Election season has arrived. The candidate filing deadline for partisan elected offices closed Friday, so we now know who is seeking election to the Wyoming Legislature, as well as federal and some county positions.
Opinion
Looking at our Legislature, this year promises to be an especially important election. Most seats have contested Republican primaries, and most of the primaries feature candidates with significant ideological differences. This election will be one of the clearest opportunities in recent memory for Wyoming to choose our path forward.
With that in mind, we all must carefully consider what issues are important to us. What are the things that truly matter and how will they help us choose how to cast our votes? Is it allegiance to a person or group? Is it a particular policy proposal? How do character, competence and temperament factor into our determination? All of these are important questions that we must each answer for ourselves.
At the same time, there are important issues facing our state that require proactive action. If a candidate is not informed on these issues, they are not prepared, nor will they be able to do the things necessary to protect Wyoming’s prosperity. Wyoming’s economy must be at the forefront. We must do what we can to prolong the lifespan of our extraction industries, while simultaneously preparing for the day that they are no longer the economic drivers of our state. We should aspire to a gentle transition from an extraction-based economy to something broader, where extraction industries are one piece of a multi-faceted economic system.
Our legislative candidates cannot have their heads in the sand. Claiming to “protect our core industries” by undercutting the development of new ones actively harms our state. Those of us who believe in a free market know that government should not be the entity choosing what industries are allowed to exist. It is unfair, oppressive and a violation of the very principles that make Wyoming and the United States great. Instead, industries will rise and decline, and the goal of our government should be to benefit from that growth when we have the opportunity. If your candidate says they want to use government to pick winners and losers, do not vote for them. An unfair playing field that comes from the right is just as bad as one that originates from the left. Both lead to bigger, and worse, government.
We also need candidates who understand the importance of considering the long-term impacts of their decisions. This means recognizing that short-term pain may sometimes be necessary for long-term benefit. Whether it concerns spending or taxes, overreactions are more harmful than helpful. We need stability and predictability, not wide fluctuations based on the mood of the day. Having the courage and foresight to exercise restraint when the solution is worse than the problem is important. Statesmen recognize that their responsibility is to do what is right for the community, even if it is the hard choice. Politicians are too distracted by their own futures to care about the futures of those that elect them. We need to choose statesmen, not mere politicians.

Lastly, we need candidates who recognize the importance of strong communities. Perhaps this is true of a lot of places, but it is especially true here: Wyoming’s communities are what make us strong. We care for one another, we are committed to one another, and we need to do what is necessary to ensure that our communities have what is necessary to survive. This means setting aside ideological rigidity to actually look at what needs to be done.
Many Wyoming communities are struggling to attract the things that make for vibrant places to live. For some, the struggle is in building a workforce to fill vacant jobs. For others, a lack of access to sufficient health care means that they have trouble attracting or keeping population. Still others may lack the amenities that can take them from good to great. To address these issues, our public officials must be willing to listen and seek real solutions, rather than letting our communities flounder and flail on the altar of ideology. Voters must listen to how candidates talk about these issues, and take that into account when casting our votes.
Above all, we need public officials who are committed to seeking the truth. We are often tempted to ignore contrary facts or opinions when they clash with our existing understanding of the way things are. But we cannot afford that luxury right now. Wyoming needs quality leadership that is committed to our state’s future. As we all exercise our right and responsibility to choose our state’s leaders, let’s all commit to choosing a future that is forward-looking and visionary. Let’s choose statesmen.

I hope that the November election gives us the opportunity to point our index fingers and say “YOU’RE FIRED” — not only to Trump but to all the other wannabes who think they are doing something noble and memorable by being as
Mr. Lenhart only talks about the Republican primaries and the candidates because there is really no one from the other political parties to vote for. Now that our Secretary of State Chuck Gray has gotten the switch party on voting day option cancelled,
There are 16 legislative races with good Democrats on the ballot for the November election. I wish there were more, but at least the voters in those 16 districts have a good choice in the fall.
Unfortunately, the republican primary election determines who runs the state. That fact alone does not shed a good light upon the people of Wyoming as a whole to make sound judgement. The track record of competency within the state republican party to be true leaders with pragmatic statesmanship has dreadfully declined over the past 20 years. It has shown it is more concerned with purity tests than in actual governing. I have not had a chance to look through everyone who is running but me thinks there is a high probability more feral and uncompromising reactionaries are the only ones on the ballot.
First of all, respect our Mothers, wives, sisters and daughters. Any “politician” that doesn’t won’t get my vote.
Very true. Extreme ideologies may sound good; however, spewing hate and discontent will only produce negative results. Looking for truth and long term benefit will win in the end.
Good editorial, thank you.