WyoFile Energy Report

Wyo officials say DKRW’s coal-to-liquids project is ‘out of compliance’

— March 20, 2013
(updated on March 23, 2013)

After first trying to delay a hearing before Wyoming regulators to buy more time to modify its construction schedule, Houston-based DKRW Advanced Fuels LLC today formally withdrew its request to modify its plans for the proposed Medicine Bow Fuel & Power coal-to-gasoline plant in Carbon County.

Dustin Bleizeffer
Dustin Bleizeffer

That means DKRW is out of compliance with its Industrial Siting Council permit, further threatening the company’s ability to secure financing for the project.

“The division’s position right now is they (DKRW) are out of compliance with their permit,” Industrial Siting administrator Luke Esch told WyoFile.

Esch said he received a letter from DKRW around lunchtime Wednesday notifying the state it was withdrawing its request to modify the permit. On Friday, Esch told local media that his agency had given DKRW until June 19 to bring its permit back into compliance, listing terms that DKRW officials say they’d already planned on pulling together well in time to meet that deadline.

The Industrial Siting Council is still scheduled to meet April 1 in Casper to hear other matters. However, since DKRW has withdrawn its “Industrial Siting Permit Socioeconomic Impact Analysis Report,” which was a condition to maintain its permit, there may be no DKRW business before the council at the April hearing.

Esch said the council will decide within the next couple of days what to request of DKRW regarding its new noncompliant status. He said the agency typically provides an opportunity for permittees to come back into compliance, but if terms are not met the permit will be revoked.

A call to DKRW officials was not returned before publication of this article.

Medicine Bow coal liquefaction process
The coal liquefaction process proposed for the Medicine Bow plant. (Courtesy of NETL/DOE — click to enlarge)

For years, DKRW has been promising to begin construction on what would be the nation’s first ever commercial scale coal-to-gasoline plant, consistently delaying the project as it attempts to complete financing. In the meantime, communities in Carbon County have been preparing to meet the demands of the construction project, estimated to require some 2,000 workers at the peak of the 40-month construction period.

Total capital cost of the project is estimated at about $2 billion.

The exact specifications of the Medicine Bow Fuel & Power plant have changed over time, but the general description is this: the plant would convert coal from Arch Coal’s adjacent Saddleback Hills and Elk Mountain mine properties into a daily output of 11,686 barrels of gasoline. In 2011, DKRW signed a 25-year contract with international commodities trader Vitol Inc. to purchase 100 percent of the gasoline production, which will be transported by pipeline and sold into the Colorado Front Range market.

St. Louis-based Arch Coal, a major coal producer in Wyoming, holds a 24 percent interest in DKRW.

— Dustin Bleizeffer is WyoFile editor-in-chief. You can reach him at (307) 577-6069 or email dustin@wyofile.com. Follow Dustin on Twitter at @DBleizeffer

If you enjoyed this report and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS ARTICLE: For details on how you can republish this article or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. UPDATE: The Casper Star-Tribune reported this morning (Saturday) that the Industrial Siting Council provided a list of terms for DKRW to meet by June 19 to bring its permit back into compliance — conditions that DKRW officials say they’d already planned on satisfying well in time to meet that deadline. You can read the CST report here; http://trib.com/business/energy/wyoming-industrial-regulator-sets-deadline-for-coal-to-gas-company/article_4da133bc-5bfb-5d28-8c5b-c6e3088d61f8.html#comments
    — Dustin Bleizeffer

  2. I’m much more curious why DKRW retained a state run Chinese contractor , SINOTECH , to build this innovative plant using General Electric’s GE Systems technology. No American firm could do this ?

    Is this the fruit of Governor Matt Mead’s outreach to China on behalf of the Wyoming coal industry , or…..?