WyoFile Energy Report

Wyoming embarks on groundwater monitoring rule for oil and gas development

— June 13, 2013

Officials in Wyoming were caught flat-footed when residents outside the town of Pavillion began asking tough questions about hydraulic fracturing and a sudden change in the quality of their drinking water, leading to nasty fights between residents, oil and gas operators, the state and federal agencies.

Dustin Bleizeffer
Dustin Bleizeffer

A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency investigation into the matter failed to resolve the situation, and may have even fanned the flames of disagreement. The question about whether hydraulic fracturing — or fracking — is to blame for degraded water quality in Pavillion may never be answered, for one key reason: lack of baseline water quality testing and ongoing water quality monitoring.

This week, officials from Gov. Matt Mead’s staff, along with the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, set out to implement a plan that may help avoid Pavillion-type scenarios. State officials rolled out a proposed rule change to establish a baseline groundwater testing and monitoring program for oil and natural gas development.

A public meeting will be held June 25 at the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in Casper to gather oral and written comments from stakeholders and the public at large, intending to help establish the parameters of this “rule change” process.

While the Wyoming State Geological Survey and University of Wyoming team up to conduct a broad inventory of groundwater in the state, oil and gas operators will be required to test groundwater only in areas where they drill.

Jeremiah Rieman, natural resource policy advisor to Gov. Mead, said the governor’s staff chose not to propose a “presumptive” model, as did Colorado, sparking much controversy. Under a presumptive model, operators are assumed to be responsible for any pollutants not identified prior to drilling. Instead, a forensic investigation into whether or not drilling activities contributed to groundwater pollution would rely on data collected under the state’s established groundwater monitoring program.

The draft rules establish a .5-mile parameter around each new oil and natural gas wellhead in which to test and monitor groundwater. During the application for permit to drill (APD) process through the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, operators would be required to collect water quality data from several different water sources, such as existing domestic water wells.

The state will ask operators to choose locations up-gradient, down-gradient from the well. The proposal would establish timelines for collecting samples before and after drilling. But the data collection area would apply only to the .5-mile radius from the wellhead — not to areas related to the reach of horizontal wellbores that can extend for 2 miles, such as in the current shale oil play in eastern Wyoming.

All water sampling data supplied to the state will be made available to the public, however a landowner can choose to not submit the information to the state.

To view the draft rulemaking document and appendix go to the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission website and click on the “2013 proposed rules” button on the right-hand side of the page.

— Dustin Bleizeffer is WyoFile editor-in-chief. He has written about Wyoming’s energy industries for 15 years. You can reach him at (307) 577-6069 or email dustin@wyofile.com. Follow Dustin on Twitter at @DBleizeffer

If you enjoyed this report and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS REPORT: For details on how you can republish this report or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer is a Report for America Corps member covering energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. another interesting, untold, story on groundwater contamination, is that of Fish Creek, Teton county, Wy. A ski area that only injects its sewage effluent forty feet deep in a surface aquifer, a rancher that spread millions of gallons of sludge on top of this surface aquifer. After thirty years, a premiere clear and gravelly blue ribbon trout stream and and spawning grounds is full of invasive aquatic plants, algae and silt.