Guest column by Judith Kohler
March 19, 2013
Relatively speaking, Wyoming’s economy is looking good. Its unemployment rate is well below the national rate. Its two largest cities were among the fastest-growing in the country last year.
But Wyoming is no North Dakota, as U.S. Rep Cynthia Lummis pointed out in a recent congressional hearing. The Cowboy state appears to be suffering from energy-boom envy, if Lummis is typical of her fellow Wyomingites.
The same day Lummis spoke longingly of the oil boom that’s rocking western North Dakota and the industry, the U.S. Census Bureau issued a news release trumpeting an oil and gas boom driven population growth “in or at least near the Great Plains and West Texas.”
The release goes on to say that “two areas in Wyoming (Casper and Cheyenne), along with Manhattan, Kan., and Bismarck, N.D., were also among the 20 fastest-growing metropolitan areas.” In fact, Casper’s 3 percent population increase from 2011 to 2012 made it the country’s eighth-fastest growing metro area. Midland, Texas, was first.
That didn’t stop Lummis from bemoaning that Wyoming isn’t in the same class as North Dakota, which owes its oil rush to the Bakken, a massive formation that stretches into Montana and Saskatchewan. Lummis told the House Subcommittee on Energy Mineral Resources last week that a big difference is while nearly half of Wyoming is managed by the federal government, most of the land being drilled up north is private.
Thus, no onerous federal regulations intended to protect the public’s lands, health and welfare to impede a drilling bonanza.
“It’s easier to get a permit to drill and, hence, a job in North Dakota than it is in Wyoming,” Lummis continued.
As a result, many workers have left their families in Wyoming to commute to North Dakota “because the jobs are in North Dakota for oil and gas production and no longer in Wyoming,” Lummis said.
Her remarks came during the subcommittee’s hearing “America’s Onshore Energy Resources: Creating Jobs, Securing America and Lowering Prices.” Chairman Doug Lamborn of Colorado made it clear that he believes not enough holes are being punched in Western public lands. He asserted that the Obama administration has issued “duplicative and burdensome regulations” and withdrawn “hundreds of thousands of acres” from energy production.
Committee member Lummis said the administration has created obstacles to drilling on federal lands. Her state has seen a decline in jobs the last four years, Lummis said, although she conceded that Wyoming’s unemployment rate “remains substantially below the nation’s unemployment rate.”
Wyoming’s jobless rate fell to 4.9 percent in December from 5.1 percent, the Wyoming Department of Workforce Services reported. The national rate was 7.8 percent for the same period.
And while Wyoming is no North Dakota, it’s more an issue of geography than federal policy. People are drilling like crazy in North Dakota because that’s where the oil is. Much of the oil nationwide is under private land, according to a recent report by the Denver-based Center for Western Priorities. Even in the Rocky Mountain West, which has a big chunk of the nation’s public lands, “89 percent of shale oil and mixed oil and gas plays underlie nonfederal lands,” according to the report “Follow the Oil.”
Here’s another factor: oil, which is plentiful in North Dakota, is selling for big bucks while natural gas, which is plentiful in Wyoming, is selling at rock-bottom prices.
Give us another boom, please!
There’s a kind of plea in parts of the West where economies have long been tied to the waxing and waning of mineral production: “Dear God, give us another boom and we promise not to waste it this time.”
Rep. Lummis was in the Wyoming Legislature in 1992 when the region was still struggling with fallout from a big oil bust. State budgets were tight. I was part of the press corps covering the Wyoming Legislature then and we wrote several stories about lawmakers fighting over across-the-board spending cuts. It was a rough time.
Energy production is an important part of the economy. It’s necessary. It’s also a complex issue. Instead of hearings that reduce energy policy to ideology or ignore market forces, politicians should consider developing a comprehensive, forward-looking national energy plan that recognizes other important economic sectors – hunting, fishing tourism, recreation and agriculture. Those are the steady, sustainable sectors that can tide you over until the next big boom – providing they don’t get run over in the rush.
Judith Kohler is communications manager for the National Wildlife Federation’s Rocky Mountains and Prairies Regional Center.
Guest columns and essays are the signed perspective of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of WyoFile’s staff, board of directors or its supporters. WyoFile welcomes guest columns and op-ed pieces from all points of view. If you’d like to write a guest column for WyoFile, please contact Guy Padgett at email@example.com or Dustin Bleizeffer at firstname.lastname@example.org.
REPUBLISH THIS GUEST COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this guest column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.
If you enjoyed this story and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
If we are hurting so bad for oil why is Mr. John “I Never Met a TV Camera I Didn’t Like” Barrasso, wanting and willing to export it?
Let us drill baby drill! I know it would make my life ten times easier, the cost to drive 10 hours is almost not worth it not to mention the time away from home! Give us the chance, we have oil plentiful around here and the liberals won’t allow us to poke at it! The amount of revenue Wyoming would recive would be amazing putting us ahead of many other places, jobs would increase with every roughneck comes a new job! More business would open.
Look up the violent crimes data for North Dakota and see what else the boom has brought to the state. The numbers are impressive. I don’t think it’s a good trade off for temporary boom jobs.
All this of course begs the real question: Who WANTS to be like North Dakota? Tens of thousands of old-time Dakotans wish the Bakken did not exist. As we used to say in Fairbanks during the Trans Alaska Pipeline boom, “Happiness is a Texan headed south with an Okie under each arm!”
The report by the “Center for Western Priorities” did not include the west half of the Powder River Basin nor did it include the western basins of Wyoming. These are major producing areas with a great deal more potential. In fact about 70% of the mineral estate in Wyoming is owned by the Federal Government. With all the stipulations placed on the Federal mineral estate, drilling has become for much of the State a seasonal occupation. States such as North Dakota and Texas have year around drilling. The seasonal nature of drilling in Wyoming makes it much more difficult to keep good rigs in the area and for rig workers to live here with families. It also causes the cost of drilling and operating in Wyoming to be more expensive, thus negatively impacting the economics for oil and gas production in the State.
In spite of the greater cost of operating in Wyoming we are experiencing a significant increase in oil production. Because regardless of what the poorly informed people at the Center for Western Priorities may “feel”, we are blessed with abundant producible oil in Wyoming, most of it on Federal lands.
Conservatives like to imply, despite facts to the contrary, that all things are equal underground, but that federal or private ownership is the sole determination as to where industry drills or not.
What a joke.