A DEQ worker collects samples from Alkali Creek below where produced water from the Moneta Divide Field is discharged. (Wyoming DEQ)

Following the world’s hottest year on record and a series of increasingly intense and damaging environmental disasters, including a historically bad year for wildfires in Wyoming, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday it is rolling back dozens of climate rules and fossil fuel regulations in an effort to “usher in the golden age of American success.”

The agency, as part of President Donald Trump’s “Unleashing American Energy” initiative, will eliminate or otherwise “reconsider” the Clean Power Plan, along with the landmark 2009 “endangerment finding” that greenhouse gases cause harm. Also on the chopping block are “Mercury and Air Toxics Standards” for coal-fired power plants, regulatory greenhouse gas reporting, a risk management program for oil and gas refineries and dozens of other federal pollution control measures.

“Today is the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a prepared statement that was accompanied by a video message. “We are driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion to drive down cost of living for American families, unleash American energy, bring auto jobs back to the U.S. and more.”

The actions have major implications in Wyoming, where both fossil fuel extraction and a large federal land footprint play major economic roles and touch almost every aspect of life in the state.

An oil well in Campbell County flares methane, adding to atmospheric pollution and wasting a valuable public resource. (Courtesy Powder River Basin Resource Council)

Many industry officials, conservation groups and politicos in Wyoming were still absorbing the possible implications Thursday, noting the sprawling actions trigger myriad legal and logistical questions.

Compounding those questions is general uncertainty and chaos surrounding the Elon Musk-led federal employee purge, Trump’s freeze on federal funding and grant programs, as well as an ever-evolving tariff war. Further complicating the EPA’s regulatory rollback: How Wyoming, which maintains primacy over many federal emissions programs and sometimes implements more stringent requirements, might respond to the new initiatives.

From Zeldin’s perspective, the EPA’s efforts to undo “flawed” and “suffocating rules” implemented under past Democratic administrations that “restrict nearly every sector of our economy and cost Americans trillions of dollars” will make it “more affordable to purchase a car, heat homes, and operate a business.”

Asked whether oil and gas companies in Wyoming might respond by relaxing environmental mitigation efforts, Petroleum Association of Wyoming Vice President and Director of Communications Ryan McConnaughey said that’s not the intention of industry.

“If you look at the announcements that were made [this week] from their leadership, they did not say a word about the environment or protection of air or water or waste — nothing.”

John Burrows, Wyoming Outdoor Council

“Wyoming’s natural gas and oil producers have long been leaders in emissions reductions, and we have no intention of backing away from that commitment,” McConnaughey told WyoFile via email. “Throughout the Biden administration, PAW consistently sought to engage with the EPA, offering constructive feedback and voicing concerns that the regulatory approach could lead to unnecessary closures and significant increases in energy costs for American consumers.

“Unfortunately,” McConnaughey continued, “these concerns were repeatedly ignored. By ensuring regulations align with on-the-ground technological and economic realities, we can achieve emissions goals in a cost-effective and practical manner without imposing undue burdens on American businesses or households.”

Whatever the intention, the EPA’s regulatory rollbacks are sure to have negative impacts regarding the climate, as well as the health of Wyoming landscapes and wildlife, and “on people, ultimately,” Wyoming Outdoor Council Energy and Climate Policy Director John Burrows told WyoFile.

Zeldin’s announcement, Burrows said, appears to reveal a fundamental shift in mission at EPA, he added.

“The mission of the EPA is to protect human health and the environment — that is their mission,” Burrows said. “If you look at the announcements that were made [this week] from their leadership, they did not say a word about the environment or protection of air or water or waste — nothing.”

Reached for comment, Gov. Mark Gordon’s Communications Director Michael Pearlman lauded the rollback effort. Gordon has repeatedly sued the Biden administration over policies tied to the energy industry and climate change.

“These are highly impactful actions, particularly the endangerment finding, that could be extremely beneficial to Wyoming energy producers,” Pearlman said. “This is yet another step that the Trump administration has taken to relieve the stranglehold on industry created by the Biden administration’s regulations.”

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Per the PRBR Council …”An oil well in Campbell County flares methane, adding to atmospheric pollution and wasting a valuable public resource. (Courtesy Powder River Basin Resource Council)”
    They neglected to mention the flares are there for pollution control and safety. Combustion of the non-salable gas (it’s not just methane) converts almost all VOC and HAP to relatively small volumes of NOx, CO and water vapor. The only alternatives to flaring the gas are to collect it via pipeline for centralized processing, which the PRBRC would likely complain about, or not have any oil wells.

  2. Renewable energy continues to grow in the United States even though there is always folks who don’t believe in climate science renewable energy is a runaway train. There is no stopping it.So many want to leave their children and grandchildren a good environment others could care less It’s all about money how much it cost. It won’t matter how much it cost. If we lose our environment humans won’t be able to survive it’s simple.

  3. About the only thing good that comes of this is that it hastens the extinction of the dumbest animals ever to evolve, Homo sapiens. King Trump is the prime example of what a pathetic species we truly are.

    1. Harvey. We have more than a few democrats that remind us from time to time on how stupid man can be. But in regards to Trump. Is it not great how he got inflation under control. Price of eggs are dropping as well. Putin is at the Peace Table discussing end of war. Gaza war is ending as well. Border is clamping down. SoTrump not doing to bad in first 100 days. Oh appears democrats caved in on the CR with zero earmarks for pork barrel as well. All a good start. Just because Harvey disagrees doesn’t mean a good job not being done.

  4. Remember “acid rain”? Not many remember that a direct result of the EPA’s regulatory actions REALLY boosted Wyoming’s low-sulfur coal industry into reality. Wyoming’s revenue really benefited from that action. Without those EPA regulations (and Al Simpson’s supportive actions), Wyoming’s coal would still be in the ground!

    1. Partially true. The acid rain of the 70s was a direct result of vehicle emissions caused by the introduction of the first generation catalytic converter.

  5. I am a retired Petroleum Geologist. One aspect of rolling back environmental requirements is to let producing companies be lax in managing their infrastructure. In particular, not controlling leaks of methane. Keeping infrastructure sound is not a terribly expensive endeavor. It reduces the worst contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and also preserves a valuable resource. Sloppy infrastructure management is simply bad business. Some operators need regulations or they get sloppy.

  6. I simply love the cherry picking in the article. “Hottest year on record “, this is only true if record keeping started in the year 2000. All the regulations that are being rolled back are regulations purposely written to kill fossil fuels. There is very little or any “science ” behind them. Nuclear plants are safe, reliable, and proven. The same can be said for coal. It’s time to bury the bogeyman of climate change and start thinking logically.

    1. The epa is the only thing keeping your water from being sewage. You think money can fill your water cup? You people should get used to bathing in sewage. King trump doesn’t care about you or your kids. This will now be a country or rich criminals. Putin probably bought King trumps first “gold” card. You people deserve to be poisoned by your own sewage.