Do wolves help pronghorn? Yellowstone pronghorn find sanctuary in the shadow of the wolf

Up the valley of Yellowstone National Park’s Lamar River there was a sight we had never recalled witnessing. Across the river, on the edge of a herd of bison, was a group of pronghorn (also known – incorrectly — as antelope). They were many miles from their winter range near the north entrance at Gardiner, and barely within the outer limits of a summer range map drawn by wildlife biologists.

We wondered why so many pronghorn had drifted this far east, and if maybe they hung out with bison as some protective precaution. In the old days, pronghorn would follow the bison herds, feeding on native forbs and shrubs left ungrazed by the bison. Here, the same players were reenacting their ancient roles.

Pronghorn bison
Yellowstone’s current pronghorn population ranges around 300, far below levels seen in the last century. (Patrick Dawson/WyoFile — click to enlarge)

We watched the group of pronghorn cut through the middle of the bison herd, angling through the sagebrush toward the river, just as a female radio-collared wolf turned back from watching the bison, swam the river, and trotted across the road past groups of amazed human wolf-watchers and up the mountain slope to her den.

Of course – this was all wolf territory now, hostile ground for coyotes, which had roamed here unchallenged for decades until wolves returned in 1995. Which apparently made it safe for pronghorn to range about, as coyotes would not dare enter wolf turf looking to prey on new pronghorn fawns. Coyote numbers in parts of Yellowstone have plummeted since wolves came back.

It was mid-May, just before fawning season, when most pronghorn does drop twins. Heading west back down the road towards Tower Junction, we came upon more pronghorn, close to the road, with separate groups of males and females bounding back and forth on the right-of-way, apparently heedless of human traffic in their habitat.

Fluctuating Populations

Were Yellowstone’s pronghorn expanding their range? Were they growing in number? After all, they had hovered right around 200 to 300 animals for decades, according to annual spring counts, a number considered too small by some biologists for long-term viability. Until about the late 1800s, they could still stretch out on a winter range downstream from the north entrance, into Montana’s Paradise Valley along the upper Yellowstone River, all the way to Livingston. That range shrunk, so pressured by human settlement and fences (that don’t deter elk or deer but are insurmountable for pronghorn) that the National Park Service in 1932 added an adjacent 7,600 acres of former National Forest land as pronghorn range. But it appears to be inadequate, as the  northern range’s pronghorn numbers climbed to about 800 during World War II, dropped to a low of 102 in 1981, rose to about 600 by 1990, then crashed down to its current levels below 300 ever since.

According to a NPS report, coyote predation of fawns was a major factor in the quick decline of Yellowstone’s pronghorn in the early 1990s. But the reintroduction of wolves has caused shifts in the coyote locations, subsequently creating pronghorn growth. (Patrick Dawson/WyoFile — click to enlarge)

“The reason for the sudden population decline in the early 1990s remains unclear, but fawn survival is low due to coyote predation, and development of private land north of the park has reduced available winter range,” the Park Service reported last November in a status report on Yellowstone’s wildlife. “The pronghorn range in the park is former agricultural land infested with non-native vegetation of low nutritional quality.”

As the continent’s fastest land animal, adult pronghorn don’t need to worry about predators in open country. Most threats are to the newborn, easy pickings for coyotes, bears, eagles and sometimes wolves. In Yellowstone, studies have shown that most predated pronghorn fawns have been taken by coyotes. But something has changed in recent years: Reintroduced wolf packs are dominating the scene, displacing the coyote’s once-exclusive territory and its predation of pronghorn young. Could it be that more wolves mean fewer coyotes which equals more pronghorn?

Pronghorn rebound in Grand Teton

A Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) three-year research study of pronghorn mortality in the Grand Teton National Park concluded that in sectors where there were no wolves, but a high density of coyotes, pronghorn fawn survival rate was only 10 percent.

In areas of known wolf habitat, however, 34 percent of fawns survived. More than 100 pronghorn fawns were radio-collared and monitored over the summers.

“People tend to think that more wolves always mean fewer prey,” said WCS researcher Dr. Kim Berger, lead author of the study. “But in this case, wolves are so much bigger than coyotes that it doesn’t make sense for them to waste time searching for pronghorn fawns. It would be like trying to feed an entire family on a single Big Mac.”

WCS biologists explained that wolves reduce coyote numbers by killing them outright or by causing them to shift to safer areas of the Park not utilized by wolves. After wolves were reintroduced in 1995, according to the WCS study finished in 2008, Grand Teton’s pronghorn population increased by about 50 percent.

WCS concluded that de-listing of wolf protection in the region could affect long-term viability of other species, notably pronghorn. “This study shows just how complex relationships between predators and their prey can be,” said Berger. “It’s an important reminder that we often don’t understand ecosystems nearly as well as we think we do, and that our efforts to manipulate them can have unexpected consequences.”

Not long after the WCS Teton report came the results of an intensive research project on Yellowstone’s northern range pronghorn which found that coyotes accounted for 56 percent of adult predation and up to 79 percent of fawn predation.

Pronghorn predators studied

Between 1999 and 2005, research biologists from the National Park Service at Yellowstone and University of Idaho remotely monitored pronghorn does that they had captured in the winters and fitted with radio collars equipped with mortality sensors. They also electronically tracked 28 fawns that had been fitted within four days after birth. From 1999 to 2006, they visually investigated several non-wired fawn mortality incidents.

Coyote and pronghorn
Early research on coyote predation showed evidence that wolves had displaced the coyote population in certain areas. Later studies showed pronghorn fawn were more likely to survive in areas with a higher wolf population. (Jon Sullivan — click to enlarge)

They recorded 13 predator kills of adult pronghorns: five coyotes, three cougars, one wolf and four undetermined predators, as well as one death “due to birthing complications.”

“We witnessed one instance,” the researchers reported, “in which a coyote attacked and killed an instrumented pronghorn mother on the day after she had given birth. Two of the cougar predation events on adults occurred within migration corridors in the period immediately following birthing.”

Researchers reported that they personally witnessed two of the six coyote-killed fawn events. “Also, we recovered four of the five coyote-scavenged fawn ear tags within 30 meters of coyote dens; all showed bite marks.

“Finally, a black bear was observed opportunistically killing a bedded, 10-day old fawn in 2004. The bear quickly carried the non-instrumented fawn into a timbered area while being observed by a small group of alarmed adult female pronghorn nearby.”

Predators most responsible for pronghorn adult and fawn mortality were led by coyote, followed by cougar, Golden Eagle and black bear. Wolf predation of pronghorn was considered very low, usually “opportunistic,” or by random chance. The 18-square-mile, semi-arid pronghorn winter range between Gardiner and Mammoth Hot Springs is not known wolf turf, but has plenty of coyotes, while the pronghorn’s spring and summer range is wolf territory – now hazardous zones for coyotes.

The Yellowstone researchers, careful not to draw conclusions on the wolf-coyote-pronghorn relationship, diplomatically observed, “There is speculation that the reintroduction of wolves may indirectly contribute to increased recruitment of migrant Yellowstone pronghorn by reducing the coyote population in areas of high wolf use… Further work is needed to investigate the extent to which wolves, habitat characteristics and social factors influence the predation risk posed by coyotes on Yellowstone’s northern range.”

Wolves helping pronghorn thrive?

A succeeding report, in which the Yellowstone researchers analyzed their work and published their findings in The Journal of Mammalogy in 2010, was less equivocal, concluding that, after several seasons of wolf presence, the park’s pronghorn are exhibiting uncharacteristic behavior of heading for higher ground to seek refuge from coyotes while birthing. They also state that in winter, coyotes limited in their movements by deep snow allows for high-elevation sanctuary for young pronghorn.

Pronghorn-Wolves population maps
A map of pronghorn birth sites along the northern border of Yellowstone National Park, as related to areas with wolf populations. (American Society of Mammalogists — click to enlarge)

The researchers had already chronicled incidents of pronghorn predation that mirror those of the past tens of thousands of years: That when pronghorn are away from open country, their protective advantages of visual acuity and mobility quickly diminish, and they become ambush prey for cougars and bears, notably in timbered migration corridors.

There is the obvious risk of becoming ambush prey in the mountains, but the pronghorn are now taking that chance, despite the danger, and so far it is paying off, leading, the researchers explained, “to improved reproductive success … our results suggest that wolf reintroduction has been of net benefit to the Yellowstone pronghorn population. This is further supported by the higher overall rate of fawn survival in relatively wolf-rich migrant areas compared to areas inhabited solely by non-migrants and an increase in the proportion of migrants from pre-1995 to the current study period.”

Pronghorn as living fossils

Together, bison and pronghorn represent living specimens of survivors of large mammals going back to the Pleistocene, or North American Ice Age, at least 15,000 years ago.

Back during the Pleistocene, pronghorn evolved its great speed, endurance and bulged-eyeball vision as it adapted to a couple of the fiercest, swiftest predators of the era, the American cheetah (Miracinonyx trumani) and the giant short-faced bear (Arctodus simus). Those mega-predators are long gone, and yet pronghorn remains, a living relic, running fast as ever, its evolutionary adaptation apparently not relaxed by millennia of slower predators.

Wyoming’s Natural Trap
Fossilized pronghorn of Wyoming’s Natural Trap cave. The pronghorn species has existed on Earth since the Pleistocene Era. Many of it’s predators of that era are long since extinct. (Patrick Dawson/WyoFile — click to enlarge)

“The late Pleistocene extinctions of North America decimated an ungulate and carnivore savanna fauna that was more diverse than the [contemporary] fauna of east Africa,” according to J.A. Byers in his book, “American Pronghorn.”

Byers, also a lead author of the Yellowstone pronghorn research cited above, explained, “The living pronghorn thus is a fair representative of its family. In most respects, the pronghorn is not a specialized end product, but, rather, the fortunate survivor of late Pleistocene extinctions that wiped out nearly all species of a specialized lineage… Although it is impossible to know whether running adaptations of pronghorn have declined under relaxed selection, the running ability of the species today suggests that decline has been slight. Pronghorn are ridiculously too fast for any modern predator.”

In Wyoming’s Natural Trap cave east of Lovell, paleontologists in the 1970s discovered what is considered “one of the more reliable records” of fossilized pronghorn, closely resembling today’s living Antilocapra americana, dated at between 17,000 and 20,000 years ago. Traces of more than a dozen pronghorn were found down there in the layers of sediment along with scattered remains of others that unwittingly dropped in through a hole in the cavern’s ceiling: eleven Giant American cheetah, plus short-faced bear, mammoth, saber-toothed lion, camel, sloth, Ice Age wolf and little stilt-legged horse.

As Byers observed, “The behavior of living pronghorn is, in part, a ‘historical document’ that illuminates the fossil-written text of the North American savanna fauna. … Many aspects of pronghorn behavior also read as historical documents, reflecting an earlier time of intense predation.”

The pronghorn population, according to the spring flyover count from April 2011, was not up at all over recent years – probably skewed due to dispersal of many of them down the upper Yellowstone valley due to that winter’s above-average snowfall. The biologist in the Piper Super Cub counted 242 last year, compared to 297 the previous year. Park naturalist data suggest that they are adapting, on the move, dispersing from lower to higher elevations, ranging wider, using the wolf’s territory as kind of a “no-man’s-land” buffer to protect their newborn from coyotes. The 2012 flyover count will come later this summer.

The “relict herd” of Yellowstone pronghorn that outlasted extinct American cheetah by millennia only to be stymied by fences and European settlement, still runs through the hills and valleys, always alert for predators, and helped for now, it seems, by the return of the wolf packs.

—  For over 25 years, Patrick Dawson performed reporting assignments for TIME, ranging from New Mexico to Alaska, including covering the Unabomber arrest, Freemen standoff, Yellowstone issues, the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping in Utah, energy and Native American issues. He is the author of non-fiction books, including “The Montana Cowboy” (photography by David Stoecklein) and “Mr. Rodeo: The Big Bronc Years of Leo Cremer.” His essays are included in several regional literary anthologies, including “Ring of Fire: Writers of the Yellowstone Region” (Rocky Mountain Press, Cody.) He wrote and co-produced the documentary video, “The Great Wyoming Wagon Train of 1990.” He is based in Billings, Montana.

Banner photos by Michael Wifall/Flickr and Dennis Matheson/Flickr.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

If you enjoyed this article and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

Patrick Dawson reported assignments for TIME for more than 25 years, ranging from New Mexico to Alaska, including covering the Unabomber arrest, Freemen standoff, Yellowstone issues, the Elizabeth Smart...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Great article. Informative, in-depth, and well written – exactly what I have come to expect from WyoFile.

  2. Contrary to the link posted below, the Wyofile report draws no conclusions — just chronicles the studies and observations of biologists. Nit-picking over including the Teton study ignores that this is one survey that shows the effects on pronghorn fawn predation, NOT a “muddying of the waters” when classifying the distinctive pronghorn territories. I see nothing factual in this link — only the usual groundless speculations about wolves depleting elk and deer numbers. Of course elk are harder to hunt these days — the wolves keep them more vigilant and dispersed.

  3. Mr Wheeler’s rebuttal makes some good points. This is a very complicated system that’s difficult to understand. The modern records are sketchy and the historical records are too. The author and commenters on either side that have attempted to make conclusions from their limited amounts of information based upon their personal belief systems aren’t likely to get far from their personal belief systems. “Ccarving” needs to do some homework on wolf populations, migrations, and sizes. “Dewey” might do better to accept that things aren’t going to be allowed to return to “normal” (even if we knew in any kind of detail what “normal” was).

  4. The idea that the grey wolf is not native is simply a myth supported by wolf haters. Humans have destroyed so much of the natural eco-system that it is important that preserve and protect what is left. Reintroducing wolves has returned the Natural balance the way God intended.

  5. It is true that I have noticed many more pronghorn in the Lamar, esp. this year as compared to, say, 5 years ago. Interestingly enough, I observed 2 competing wolf packs at the east end of the valley hanging around a bear on a bison carcass. Meanwhile toward the west end, I watched a coyote meandering around sagebrush with 5 doe pronghorn following him as he hunted for babies.

    For those who refuse to open their minds regarding wolves, see this article:

  6. Duncan your wrong on sooo many levels— not that it matters the population is at the highest that will be tolerated— You forget my friend– I AM part of the eco system- I’ an omnivore and I sit up the food chain from the wolves- where do you ever calculate humans into the phony formula you call balanced? My .243 is gonna balance it a bit more this fall when they come off the list—

  7. You clueless wolf lovers . . . . you’ll warp anything into a “yay for wolves” party won’t you.
    Wolves help everything survive??? Seriously, Dewey? Could you explain how the elk and moose populations plummeting due to wolves helps them survive? Do you know the elk infant survival rate is now less than 10% which is below the level needed to even maintain a population?

    And these wolves, were NEVER the historical apex predator. The wolf species that is native to the area is the Rocky Mountain Timber Wolf. Adult males of the species reached a maximum of 50 pounds. They were essentially large coyotes. But the wolves introduced here are Canadian Grey Wolves than can get upwards of 200 pounds. They are not the same animal, and don’t belong here.
    Furthermore, there was never a very large population of wolves to begin with. A complete census of yellowstone wildlife taken in the 1890’s showed healthy populations of bison, elk, deer, antelope, coyotes, bears, mountain lions, and a variety of smaller animals. The only mention of wolves in that census was a line about occasional migratory wolf sightings but NO permanent population.

    This was not a reintroduction of a native species. It was an invasion of a dangerous species for political purposes. You might as well try to solve the endangered population of wild horses in Idaho by importing Zebras from Africa.

    NO ONE who actually cares about the natural ecosystem and healthy population of animals in Yellowstone can support wolves, and they certainly won’t buy into this myth about pronghorns benefiting solely because of a wolf presence.

  8. Most “balanced” ecosystems exhibit variability with respect to the predator-prey relationship wherein their respective populations follow established close correlations, in particular, when prey species increase there is a corresponding increase in predator numbers and vice versa over time. What is unusual about this circumstance is that a historic apex predator, i.e., the wolf, had been artificially absent from the ecosystem for many decades, a situation that had allowed a second tier predator, i.e., the coyote, to occupy a niche that drove down certain prey species numbers, i.e., pronghorn. Now things are “normal”.

  9. I dont know what your perception of balanced is—- Moose and elk numbers have plummeted- There where so many wolves on the National elk refuge this year that even the wolves where killing wolves– Thank God they will be delisted so we have a small chance at checking their population— May several wolf hides be hung by the fireplaces of good men willing to correct this terrible mistake—— go drink some more cool-aid- dewey—

  10. “Yellowstone’s current pronghorn population ranges around 300 people, far below levels seen in the last century.”
    People or pronghorn?

  11. Actually , wolves help EVERYTHING survive… once they have taken their own grubstake. When wolves come into a range and take up residence, most all habitat and wildlife improves both quantitatively and qualitatively , towards balance , all other things being equal. Man is the Great Unbalancer, though.

    Wolves’ take of wildlife for food is to be allowed for, if we can only see thru to that. Therein lies the (percieved) problem with wolves…