Posted inColumns/Blog, Guest Column, Uncategorized

Wyoming's congressional delegates faced challengers in live debate

Click image to watch debates.

Wyoming’s congressional delegates faced challengers in live debate

By Gregory Nickerson

Wyoming’s congressional incumbents held their own in a debate against challengers last night, displaying the practiced manner of Washington veterans while responding to criticisms from Democratic challengers and largely getting a pass from minority party candidates.

Most of the candidates expressed conservative philosophies, perhaps best stated by two-term Wyoming Rep. Cynthia Lummis in a comment about FEMA’s response to Hurricane Sandy: “The role of the federal government is to be strong, but limited, severely limited.”

The candidates discussed Social Security, the Affordable Health Care Act, the role of government and the proper size of the military, among other issues, during the debate Thursday night hosted and moderated by Wyoming PBS, Wyoming Public Media, and the Wyoming Business Report.

Incumbent U.S. Senator John Barrasso (R), faced his challengers Tim Chestnut (D), and Country Party candidate Joel Otto. The field for Wyoming’s U.S. House seat includes U.S. Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R) who faced challengers Chris Henrichsen (D), Country Party candidate Don Wills, Constitution Party candidate Daniel Cummings, and Libertarian Richard Brubaker.

Most of the candidates questioned the scientific evidence  that mankind is influencing climate change, though several noted the earth seems to be in a warming trend. Senate candidate Joel Otto (Country Party) said he believes increased solar activity causes the warming. Sen. Barrasso doubted the wisdom of the U.S. limiting CO2 emissions, saying it could jeopardize the domestic economy. He asserted that countries like China and India generate so many emissions that a cap on U.S. CO2, “would make no difference on global emissions.”

Senate candidate Tim Chestnut (D) had concerns about the amount of money Sen. Barrasso has spent on his campaign, saying much of the Republican’s funds came from Political Action Committees (PACs) and special interests. Information on Sen. Barrasso’s campaign fundraising is available here.

Sen. Barrasso responded to Chestnut by saying over 2,200 Wyoming residents contributed to his campaign. “I’m going to represent the people. So many of the PACs are made up of people who live and work in Wyoming.”

In the debate for U.S. House, Rep. Cynthia Lummis invoked Paul Ryan’s budget plan several times, saying he has the best ideas for reforming Medicare and reducing the deficit. In her closing remarks Rep. Lummis urged voters to cast their ballots for the Romney-Ryan ticket, Sen. Barrasso, and herself. She said the Republican candidates offered a choice for growth and opportunity that contrasts with a path that would turn the U.S. into a, “European social democracy.”

House candidate Chris Henrichsen (D) criticized the Wyoming delegation’s handling of the loss of Abandoned Mine Lands money. “My first priority when I get to Washington D.C. is to get that money back. I think the delegation should have made it a bigger priority.” He argued the delegation focused too much on partisan causes and electing presidential candidates instead of tending to issues that directly affect Wyoming.

Rep. Lummis (R) defended the delegation’s actions, saying representatives from other states “cannibalized” the money in the dead of night on a committee that none of the Wyoming delegation served on. She took great offense when chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), did not answer her calls on the issue.

Constitution Party candidate Daniel Cummings said the delegation didn’t mishandle the AML funds. Country Party candidate Don Wills agreed, saying, “The delegation didn’t do anything wrong. It’s how Washington works.” Both argued that Wyoming would have been better off seeking a state-based solution for reclaiming abandoned mines.

In contrast to recent national debates between President Obama and Mitt Romney, the Wyoming candidates respected 30-second and 45-second time limits for their responses. The debates moved along at a rapid-fire pace for more than two hours. Moderators included Bob Beck from Wyoming Public Media, M.J. Clark from the Wyoming Business Report, and host Richard Ager from Wyoming PBS.

WyoFile added to the conversation by contributing questions to the moderators. WyoFile’s Dustin Bleizeffer and Gregory Nickerson also posted to twitter throughout the debate here.

Footage of the debates is available at the Wyoming PBS website.

— WyoFile reporter Gregory Nickerson is a University of Wyoming-trained historian and writer from Big Horn. He has worked on documentary films in Nicaragua, Yellowstone, and Philadelphia, and held jobs as a museum curator and hunting guide.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

— If you enjoyed this article and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.


Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Posted inThe Pitch

Wyoming's congressional delegates faced challengers in live debate

Click image to watch debates.

Wyoming’s congressional delegates faced challengers in live debate

By Gregory Nickerson

Wyoming’s congressional incumbents held their own in a debate against challengers last night, displaying the practiced manner of Washington veterans while responding to criticisms from Democratic challengers and largely getting a pass from minority party candidates.

Most of the candidates expressed conservative philosophies, perhaps best stated by two-term Wyoming Rep. Cynthia Lummis in a comment about FEMA’s response to Hurricane Sandy: “The role of the federal government is to be strong, but limited, severely limited.”

The candidates discussed Social Security, the Affordable Health Care Act, the role of government and the proper size of the military, among other issues, during the debate Thursday night hosted and moderated by Wyoming PBS, Wyoming Public Media, and the Wyoming Business Report.

Incumbent U.S. Senator John Barrasso (R), faced his challengers Tim Chestnut (D), and Country Party candidate Joel Otto. The field for Wyoming’s U.S. House seat includes U.S. Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R) who faced challengers Chris Henrichsen (D), Country Party candidate Don Wills, Constitution Party candidate Daniel Cummings, and Libertarian Richard Brubaker.

Most of the candidates questioned the scientific evidence  that mankind is influencing climate change, though several noted the earth seems to be in a warming trend. Senate candidate Joel Otto (Country Party) said he believes increased solar activity causes the warming. Sen. Barrasso doubted the wisdom of the U.S. limiting CO2 emissions, saying it could jeopardize the domestic economy. He asserted that countries like China and India generate so many emissions that a cap on U.S. CO2, “would make no difference on global emissions.”

Senate candidate Tim Chestnut (D) had concerns about the amount of money Sen. Barrasso has spent on his campaign, saying much of the Republican’s funds came from Political Action Committees (PACs) and special interests. Information on Sen. Barrasso’s campaign fundraising is available here.

Sen. Barrasso responded to Chestnut by saying over 2,200 Wyoming residents contributed to his campaign. “I’m going to represent the people. So many of the PACs are made up of people who live and work in Wyoming.”

In the debate for U.S. House, Rep. Cynthia Lummis invoked Paul Ryan’s budget plan several times, saying he has the best ideas for reforming Medicare and reducing the deficit. In her closing remarks Rep. Lummis urged voters to cast their ballots for the Romney-Ryan ticket, Sen. Barrasso, and herself. She said the Republican candidates offered a choice for growth and opportunity that contrasts with a path that would turn the U.S. into a, “European social democracy.”

House candidate Chris Henrichsen (D) criticized the Wyoming delegation’s handling of the loss of Abandoned Mine Lands money. “My first priority when I get to Washington D.C. is to get that money back. I think the delegation should have made it a bigger priority.” He argued the delegation focused too much on partisan causes and electing presidential candidates instead of tending to issues that directly affect Wyoming.

Rep. Lummis (R) defended the delegation’s actions, saying representatives from other states “cannibalized” the money in the dead of night on a committee that none of the Wyoming delegation served on. She took great offense when chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), did not answer her calls on the issue.

Constitution Party candidate Daniel Cummings said the delegation didn’t mishandle the AML funds. Country Party candidate Don Wills agreed, saying, “The delegation didn’t do anything wrong. It’s how Washington works.” Both argued that Wyoming would have been better off seeking a state-based solution for reclaiming abandoned mines.

In contrast to recent national debates between President Obama and Mitt Romney, the Wyoming candidates respected 30-second and 45-second time limits for their responses. The debates moved along at a rapid-fire pace for more than two hours. Moderators included Bob Beck from Wyoming Public Media, M.J. Clark from the Wyoming Business Report, and host Richard Ager from Wyoming PBS.

WyoFile added to the conversation by contributing questions to the moderators. WyoFile’s Dustin Bleizeffer and Gregory Nickerson also posted to twitter throughout the debate here.

Footage of the debates is available at the Wyoming PBS website.

— WyoFile reporter Gregory Nickerson is a University of Wyoming-trained historian and writer from Big Horn. He has worked on documentary films in Nicaragua, Yellowstone, and Philadelphia, and held jobs as a museum curator and hunting guide.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

— If you enjoyed this article and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.


Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gift this article