Natrona County District Judge Dan Forgey on Friday temporarily halted enforcement of Wyoming’s newest anti-abortion law while a legal challenge against it proceeds. 

The law in question, which was passed by the Wyoming Legislature during the 2026 session and took effect in March, bans abortion in all but the earliest days of pregnancy. More specifically, the “heartbeat” law makes abortion illegal beyond approximately the sixth week of pregnancy, when it’s first possible to detect fetal cardiac activity. 

The plaintiffs in the case, which include the few providers who perform abortions in Wyoming, argue the law is unconstitutional due to language in the state constitution that protects an individual’s right to make their own health care decisions. 

Those protections were also the basis for the Wyoming Supreme Court’s January decision to strike down two previous abortion bans. 

Wyoming Attorney General Keith Kautz argued at a Wednesday hearing that the new law fits within the bounds of the Wyoming Constitution and the high court’s decision. He also pushed back on the plaintiffs’ argument that the law was too ambiguous and that detection of a heartbeat was an arbitrary point to enforce restrictions.

The plaintiffs, however, “made a sufficient showing of irreparable injury,” Judge Forgey wrote in his Friday decision temporarily halting the law’s enforcement. 

“The state defendants did not persuasively argue otherwise,” he wrote. 

Forgey also pointed to the high court’s January ruling, known as the Johnson case.  

“The plaintiffs have on this record made a sufficient showing of probable success that justifies their request for temporary injunctive relief, particularly when the statues at issue are evaluated and considered according to Article 1, [Section] 38 of the Wyoming Constitution, and how the Wyoming Supreme Court applied it in Johnson.”

This is a breaking news story and may be updated.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *