On the morning of Sept. 6, 1870, a group of Black women employed as servants at a hotel in Wyoming Territory got into a carriage and rode to the polls. The crowd at the polling place parted quietly as they approached. They voted and returned to the carriage. No one said a word.

John Kingman, a justice on Wyoming Territory’s first Supreme Court, who witnessed the scene, described his relief afterward. “Then I breathed freely,” he wrote. “I knew all was safe.” 

What had just happened was, as far as historians can determine, a first in American history. The Black women who voted in Wyoming Territory on that September day were almost certainly the first Black women in the United States ever to cast a ballot.

Most of Wyoming’s Black women worked as housekeepers, domestic servants and laundresses, according to the 1870 census, the same census that recorded the women who would vote that September. (Wyoming State Archives)

Wyoming had passed the world’s first women’s suffrage law the previous December. Gov. John Campbell signed it on Dec. 10, 1869, making the territory the first government anywhere to recognize full woman suffrage. Utah followed in February 1870, and women there voted before Wyoming’s first election was held. But as far as is known, no Black women voted in Utah’s 1870 elections. And the other region where Black women may have voted that year, South Carolina, held its elections in October and November, after Wyoming’s September election.

None of this happened without a fight. During the 1869 territorial legislative session, Rep. Benjamin Sheeks tried to kill the suffrage bill by proposing an amendment — using a now-offensive term for Indigenous women — to enfranchise “all colored women and squaws,” apparently believing that the prospect of women of color voting would be enough to doom the measure. He was wrong. His amendment was rejected, and the bill that passed unambiguously enfranchised all women citizens, regardless of race.

It is worth pausing on that phrase: all women citizens. Wyoming’s suffrage law did not extend to Indigenous women, who were not considered American citizens until passage of the Indian Citizenship Act in 1924. The achievement of 1870 was real and significant, but it was incomplete.

The 1870 federal census, taken three months before the September election, recorded 30 Black or mixed-race women above age 21 living in Wyoming Territory, with three more who may have turned 21 by election day. Of those women, 23 had been born in states where slavery was legal before the Civil War. Most were probably born into slavery. They had come west looking for what historian Tricia Martineau Wagner describes as “economic independence and professional opportunities.” Most worked as housekeepers, laundresses and domestic servants. Several lived with their families in households that owned property and ran businesses.

One of them was Lucinda “Lucy” Phillips of Cheyenne, who had arrived on the first train into the city in 1867 and had been born into slavery in Kentucky. We do not know for certain that Phillips voted in 1870, but she was unafraid to use the franchise in later years. In 1885, when a white resident of Granite Canyon — a railroad stop west of Cheyenne — petitioned the school board to segregate the city’s schools, Phillips and other Black women wrote to the Cheyenne Sun in protest. They demanded to know who the petitioners were, warning that anyone who supported segregation would face their “political death-warrant” when Black voters went to the polls. The Sun recommended the segregation proposal be thrown in the wastebasket. It was. When Phillips died in 1910 at the age of 106, newspapers across Wyoming ran her obituary.

On April 27, 1909, the Wyoming Semi-Weekly Tribune published an article about Lucy Phillips and this image of her to commemorate her 105th birthday.
One of several death notices published statewide for Phillips, this one in the [Evanston] Wyoming Press on May 14, 1910.

The officials who oversaw the 1870 election understood what was at stake. Kingman and territorial secretary Edward Lee were both Radical Republicans and Union Army veterans who had served as brigadier generals, men accustomed to using federal authority to protect rights under threat. So had territorial governor Campbell. All three men supported equal rights, and all three knew that not everyone in Wyoming did. A year earlier, at South Pass City, armed men had threatened to keep Black men from voting. A U.S. Marshal had to escort them to the polls at gunpoint.

So, in 1870, when it was time for Black women to vote for the first time, officials made sure they could. Beyond the scene Kingman witnessed, territorial secretary Lee recorded that a deputy U.S. Marshal personally escorted two Black women to the polls. Lee called it a “remarkable coalition,” invoking scripture: “the lion and the lamb shall lie down together.”

Wyoming celebrates its suffrage history with justifiable pride. The full story, including who was there and what it cost them to show up, is worth knowing too.

This column is adapted from Jennifer Helton’s article “Then I Breathed Freely: Black Women Vote in Wyoming, 1870,” at WyoHistory.org.

Related Articles:
Right Choice, Wrong Reasons: Wyoming Women Win the Right to Vote 
Women on the Jury: Wyoming Makes History Again 
Who Cast the First Vote? 
Who was Lucretia Marchbanks? From Slavery to Ranch Life in the Black Hills 
Liz Byrd, First Black Woman in Wyoming’s Legislature

Leslie Waggener spent more than two decades as a faculty archivist at the American Heritage Center at the University of Wyoming, where she worked with the papers of prominent individuals, businesses, and...

Kylie McCormick is a Casper-based historian and the editor and executive director of WyoHistory.org. She holds a master’s degree in history from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and has taught Wyoming...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *