The cliffs of Tensleep Canyon are home to scores of climbing areas, including Dry Wall, which is visible in the center-right of this photo. (Matt Enlow)

The Bighorn National Forest has hit pause on a multi-year process to create a Tensleep Canyon climbing management plan. 

The national forest cited lack of leadership as the reason for the delay. It seeks to replace outgoing Powder River District Ranger Traci Weaver, who guided the climbing plan process before resigning in June to take another job. 

An environmental analysis was anticipated to be released this fall. 

“There were some items that were coming up through the data collection and some questions, and we just can’t really answer those yet until we get our permanent district ranger in place,” said Sara Evans Kirol, Bighorn National Forest public affairs officer. 

The agency does not have a timeline currently for when the position will be filled or the plan restarted, but Kirol said leaders “are working very diligently trying to fill the position because it’s a priority for the forest.”

History 

The Powder River Ranger District has been drafting a climbing management plan for Tensleep Canyon to grapple with management challenges related to the canyon’s skyrocketing popularity as a recreation destination. With roughly 1,200 established routes, the canyon is the most popular sport-climbing destination in the Northern Rocky Mountains, according to the U.S. Forest Service. 

But with crowds, the canyon has experienced symptoms of being over-loved, such as user-created trails and crowded parking lots. The discovery of manufactured climbing routes — a widely condemned practice that employs hammers or glue to manipulate rock holds — also fueled a contentious battle amid climbers over ethical development. 

At the height of the route development controversy in Tensleep Canyon, a group of climbers chopped several routes — removing the bolted equipment from the rock — and secured padlocks on bolts at the base of other routes. (Screenshot/Facebook/Ten Sleep Canyon Aerospace Society)

The Forest Service stepped in in July of 2019 when it issued what amounted to a moratorium on the establishment of any new climbing routes or trails in the entire Bighorn National Forest. 

The prohibition was aimed at giving the agency time to develop a climbing management plan, Weaver said. The 2005 Bighorn National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan included recommendations to develop such a plan, she noted, and it was overdue.

The forest released a scoping document on the plan in February 2021, and received nearly 500 comments by the March deadline. Agency personnel worked over the summer to collect data on resource impacts, Kirol said, as they worked on an environmental analysis. 

The scoping documents identified several issues the Forest Service hopes to address in the 26,000-acre project area. They include dangerous highway conditions, improper disposal of human and pet waste, erosion at the bases of cliffs, impacts on wildlife like nesting raptors and a proliferation of dispersed camping — including within 100 feet of Tensleep Creek, which flows into the town of Ten Sleep. 

Implications 

The plan has the potential to ripple beyond the walls of the canyon, climbing advocates say. As one of only a handful of Forest Service plans specifically focused on climbing, it could influence how the pursuit is managed on national forest land across the U.S. 

While the planning process has been temporarily paused, the prohibition on new development remains in place, Kirol said. 

The forest hired a climbing ranger to help educate the public about good resource stewardship a couple seasons ago. This summer it hired a second ranger in partnership with the Bureau of Land Management, she said. 

The agency doesn’t have exact numbers on 2021 visitation, Kirol said, but the climbing rangers “said they were very busy.”

CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to reflect that the forest was working on an environmental analysis for the plan. -Ed.

Katie Klingsporn reports on outdoor recreation, public lands, education and general news for WyoFile. She’s been a journalist and editor covering the American West for 20 years. Her freelance work has...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *