BLM to remove 6,000 horses from range, boost contraception
Reprinted with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. Not for republication by Wyoming media.

The Interior Department over the next six months plans to remove more than 6,000 horses from federal lands and administer birth control to roughly 2,000 more in an effort to protect rangelands and reduce future herd growth.

The plan, which drew immediate criticism from horse advocates who argue the gathers are costly and inhumane, is required by law to balance herds with their habitat, the Bureau of Land Management said.

The gathers will emphasize the use of birth control to reduce the need for future removals, which saddle the agency with the long-term costs of caring for the horses in corrals.

Techniques will include injecting mares with the fertility vaccine PZP before the spring birthing season, increasing the male-to-female ratios of some herds and gelding some studs to prevent them from impregnating mares.

Fertility control is the cornerstone of BLM’s long-term plan to rein in costs, Dean Bolstad, the agency’s Nevada-based deputy division chief of wild horses, said last month.

“We clearly must change from our old mode of doing business, which was gather and remove,” Bolstad said. “It calls attention to the importance of controlling population growth. That’s the heart and core of this issue. … We have to do it, it has to be effective and we have to do more of it.”

The agency estimated that about 38,500 wild horses and burros — about 33,000 horses and 5,500 burros — roam BLM lands in 10 Western states, but that the range can support about 26,600. The population was last surveyed in February.

The tentative schedule calls for 16 gathers in Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. The agency removed about 8,400 horses and burros from the wild in fiscal 2011.

A recent decline in adoptions suggests many, if not most, of the next 6,338 horses to be removed will need to be placed in short- and long-term corrals, which eat up more than half the agency’s wild horse budget.

The agency said it will allow the public and media to observe the gathers in areas it deems safe for both viewers and animals. It also pledged to end helicopter-driven gathers by Feb. 28, roughly a month before normal foaling season.

The plan drew fire from the American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, a coalition of 40 groups that is calling for a halt to roundups and for BLM to allow more horses on the range.

“The BLM is misleading Congress and the public when it claims that it is reforming, because the agency continues to clear the land of mustangs to make room for commercial livestock grazing,” said the coalition’s Suzanne Roy.

The agency plan allows the removal of far more horses than the public is able to adopt and will result in higher long-term holding costs, Roy said. BLM last month said it was on track for about 3,000 adoptions in the fiscal year that ended in September. Future adoption numbers depend largely on the health of the economy.

“This mismanaged federal program is bankrupting American taxpayers and devastating our remaining wild horse herds,” Roy said.

A BLM spokesman was not available to respond this morning, as federal offices were closed for Columbus Day.

The agency said the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act requires the agency to “immediately remove excess animals from the range so as to achieve appropriate management levels” as soon as it determines the animals have overpopulated a certain area. Herds have few natural predators and can double every four years, the agency has argued.

In addition, the agency in the past has faced lawsuits when wild horses have wandered off public lands and onto neighboring private lands (Land Letter, Aug. 11).

But wild horse advocates have long questioned the methodology behind BLM’s determination of “appropriate management levels,” as well as its tally of wild horses currently on the range.

While a recent Government Accountability Office report suggested BLM was likely undercounting, the agency has commissioned a two-year National Academy of Sciences study to explore both issues, among several others.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. For NAS to do any good BLM has to get rid of conflict of interest on their part; cause by the time this 2year investigation is over; BLM will have taken it’s toll on the now what’s left of the free herds; BLM needs to police their own harassment, maiming, inhumane treatment, running horses to exhaustion, leaving new foals in the dust clouds from copters and hitting animals with copter skids, running young horses so their hooves are run to the quick; at 500.00 accusations how much money have weade so far? Keep your enemies close but they’ll find you out? So many ban leaders have broken their necks resulting in not a quick death but were loaded right with it’s own family or other stallions, stress, fights, deaths? Herds wet with sweat, were left in sub zero blizzard weather wait for trucks, trailers to long haul foals in with parent horses to be trampled? Shame on you BLM …those are OUR HORSES, OUR PUBLIC LANDS, WILDHORSES DON’T NEED US, they need freedom; they regulate their own demise, feed, home, and they have own predators, lions, wolves, birds, wolverine, MAN SHOOTS THEM, POISONS, HITS, POACHED, etc. It’s greed, oil, mining, stupidity that is decimating the Wildhorse pop. People w/no sense, like you, ranchers, and now the NAS