Interior Secretary Doug Burgum signed a 10-year plan Friday that preserves Wyoming’s decades-long allocation for the drought-plagued Colorado River Basin.

The plan sets operating criteria for releases into and out of the southwestern reservoirs of Lake Powell and Lake Mead for an initial two-year period, calling on California, Nevada and Arizona — Lower Basin states — to cut their water use. The three states will see their collective share reduced by 2.5 million acre-feet over the period under Burgum’s signed record of decision.

“Wyoming water users continue to face significant water cuts in dry years like this one,” State Engineer Brandon Gephart, Wyoming’s water czar, said in a statement Friday. Those reductions won’t be administrative decrees, however, but the result of natural hydrography.

“They [Wyoming irrigators and other users] won’t face additional cuts under the Record of Decision or the Operating Guidelines.”

Brandon Gebhart

Wyoming irrigators and other state users “won’t face additional cuts under the Record of Decision or the Operating Guidelines because the Secretary’s authority to mandate cuts is tied to Lake Mead and our users don’t receive water from Lake Mead,” Gebhart said.

The guidelines would ensure that enough water fills the two reservoirs to generate electricity and preserve infrastructure from degradation. The plan sets a framework for future operations to be revised in two-year blocks.

Burgum and the Bureau of Reclamation imposed the plan after the Upper Basin states of Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah failed to agree with Lower Basin states on how to manage river flows. Overly optimistic estimates of how much water the Colorado River Basin would provide and an ongoing drought have strained the system on which 40 million people have some reliance.

About 100,000 people in Wyoming live in the Green and Little Snake River basins, tributaries to the Colorado River, or rely significantly on its water.

Despite the upper and lower division states — which are supposed to share flows equally — not reaching a consensus, Burgum praised their efforts.

“We are grateful for the seven basin states, the 30 basin tribes, Mexico, and many other basin stakeholders who have provided the feedback and voluntary arrangements necessary for the development of the 2027-2028 operating guidelines,” he said in a statement.

Wyoming will see some effects of the agreement at Flaming Gorge Reservoir. There, water managers will drain storage to ensure the water in the two major downstream reservoirs is deep enough to generate electricity and keep the dams and associated canals from deteriorating.

Lowering the reservoir’s water level has and will continue to disrupt recreation at Flaming Gorge near the town of Green River, Wyoming. At the same time, Lake Powell reached a new record low this month, the shallowest the reservoir has been since the Glen Canyon Dam was constructed.

“The Record of Decision and the 2027-2028 Operating Guidelines respond better to hydrologic conditions than previous operations did,” Gebhart’s statement reads. “They are a positive step towards managing the system based on available supply.”

The 10-year plan doesn’t resolve the fact that states have been allocated more water than the river system can deliver. Engineers calculated that some 15 million acre-feet a year would be available. More than 16 million acre-feet a year was allocated, but the basin produces as little as 12.5 million annually.

Not a long-term fix

Gov. Mark Gordon and his counterparts in the Upper Basin were pleased with the proposal — now finalized — when it was released earlier this year.

“We are encouraged that new operating guidelines will better reflect existing water supply, which must underpin any practicable plan going forward,” they said in a statement.

Gebhart, Wyoming’s water boss, has said the Bureau of Reclamation was acknowledging reality.

“In the Upper Basin, water use is already limited by available supply, administered under state law, and the Secretary [of Interior] does not have … authority to mandate reductions,” Gebhart told WyoFile earlier this month.

Wyoming could conserve water voluntarily, but ranchers and others who forego their rights will likely do so only for money and on a temporary basis.

Meantime, experts predict conflict and stress in the long term.

Drought will likely cause agricultural stress in Arizona, Nevada and California and may not deliver traditional supplies of winter vegetables and maybe even other crops, said Sarah Porter, director of the Kyl Center for Water Policy at Arizona State University’s Morrison Institute. She spoke in a Zoom webinar earlier this month.

Litigation, too, looms.

The plan “doesn’t place the basin on a path to stabilizing the system at all,” Porter said. “It doesn’t resolve conflict at all. It doesn’t achieve the [long-term] things that the basin really needs at this point.” She said she expects Lower Basin states to contest the plan.

Continued drought, however, could eventually catch up with Wyoming if upper division states can’t deliver a certain amount of water downstream. In such a case, lower states could make a compact call that could require Wyoming to cut its use.

“We are still reviewing the Record of Decision, but so far we do not see any significant changes to what was proposed,” Gebhart said. “We still have work to do, and the framework adopted today allows us to continue working with our federal and Basin State partners towards a sustainable, consensus-based solution for the long-term. Wyoming remains committed to that goal.”

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *