When I got my first job as a reporter, I knew I was not entering a career field that would make me wealthy. Even in 1976 it was hard to stretch $100 a month very far.

But like my fellow journalists I was confident that I could count on always having a job. Conventional wisdom held that local newspapers were so indispensable to our society — so critical to keeping the community informed, engaged and self-aware — that they were like the Treasury Bills of employers.

We had the first part right, and still do. But with the benefit of hindsight everyone can see the flaw in our logic: community value and financial stability are not the same thing. Too often they’re not even related. And, of course, the newspaper industry has been going downhill in a hurry for several years. The existence of a website called “Newspaper Death Watch” is not a good omen.

As a college student I witnessed a golden age of the industry. It was the era of Watergate and the Pentagon Papers when the Washington Post and New York Times were daily breaking huge stories of enormous public import on the largest possible stages. No crime, corruption or malfeasance was safe from the glare of the spotlight, even at the highest levels of government.

The same was true in Wyoming, though on a lower-profile, when I started reporting here. Newsrooms around the state teemed with reporters and editors, each hungry, each digging, each striving daily to uncover the facts in the public interest. Idealism and professionalism were big drivers, but you can’t underestimate rivalry and competition among papers as motivating factors too. The effect was a more knowledgeable and effective citizenry with a more transparent and responsive government.  

Today’s Wyoming press corp is a skeleton crew by comparison. That’s no knock on the hardworking pros who comprise it — they do wonders with what they have. But there’s just no substitute for raw numbers and person-power. It’s no coincidence that the Center for Public Integrity ranks Wyoming dead last for access to public information.

The Casper Star-Tribune, to cite one example,  had a full-time reporter in Washington, D.C. when I worked there, and a two-person capital bureau in Cheyenne. During legislative sessions up to three of our reporters would “parachute” into the Capitol Building to work on issues they covered full time. The paper closed its capital bureau and now has one reporter covering the Legislature each session in person, with only the occasional backup from Casper. 

During the most recent legislative session WyoFile, the Star-Tribune and Wyoming Tribune Eagle were the only regular press room inhabitants from the print journalism world — the AP and Jackson Hole News&Guide also made occasional appearances. That’s a far cry from the hordes that used to throng the capital from nearly every paper in the state decades ago.

There isn’t a single full-time Washington correspondent in the state, and there hasn’t been for years. 

Thinking of the opacity in Cheyenne, to say nothing of the scandal machine that is the Trump administration, makes me shudder. What’s going unreported for lack of hands on deck?

It’s not Wyoming’s problem alone. Thousands of talented journalists have either left the business in frustration or been unable to find work, including Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer Ryan Kelly, who now works at a Virginia brewery. The Salt Lake Tribune recently laid off about a third of its newsroom staff. The Denver post did too. Between 2000 and 2016, the Bureau of Labor and Statistics reported, more than half of all newspaper jobs disappeared.

Some of the losses can be chalked up to corporate consolidation. The Casper Star-Tribune, owned by Lee Enterprises, a national chain of papers in small markets, outsourced its circulation department to a Lee paper in Billings, Mont. Page designer jobs were eliminated in favor of having the work done at universal design desks in other cities.

The industry-wide bloodbath has led to a brave new world in the profession and a number of creative solutions. One near and dear to my heart has been the rise of independent, nonprofit journalism outlets like WyoFile that rely directly on member support and give their stories away for free.

Another, that I’m still trying to get my mind around, has been increased collaboration and cooperation among legacy papers.

Never Miss a Drake’s Take. Subscribe for free.

Since last October about 30 weekly and daily Wyoming newspapers have joined the Wyoming News Exchange under the auspices of the Wyoming Press Association. The venture is run by Jim Angell, former WPA executive director and Associated Press writer, and his wife Mary, also a reporter and editor. It lets papers share and publish one another’s stories.

The idea of the Star-Tribune and Tribune-Eagle combining forces and sharing news stories was once completely unthinkable at both newspapers. Several now-deceased editors I worked for would be rolling in their graves at the thought of giving articles to competitors.

I’ve always believed competition is needed for newspapers to develop the best possible content they can. As editor of the Wyoming Eagle in Cheyenne in the late 1980s, I fought hard to keep the Tribune and Eagle from merging their news staffs. It happened in the ‘90s after I left. For decades journalists have been fueled by the desire to break a story first.

But the situation has changed. With staff sizes having shrunk to bare-bones proportions, publishers have to find new ways to keep the public informed. What was once viewed as necessary competition can now be seen as duplication of effort that Wyoming and its papers can ill afford. The WNE makes stories available to other papers in the network as soon as they appear on the web, so a reporter’s work may be published the same day in different papers. The news exchange also distributes WyoFile stories to the state’s papers.

That doesn’t mean journalists don’t try to get a story first, and when they do it’s still a source of pride. If there are two simultaneous legislative meetings, it makes sense for two publications to agree to each send a reporter to one of them so both are covered. But it seems wrong.

In an interview Angell pointed out some advantages. Small and large weeklies that don’t have the money to obtain news from the Associated Press can publish articles verbatim that originated in the dailies. Updated technology allows news to travel quickly to all parts of the state and keeps people better informed about what’s happening in Wyoming.

I’ve known the Angells for more than 30 years, and I’m happy their venture has become successful so quickly. It fills a niche largely created by continuing financial problems at most Wyoming newspapers, and I hope they can expand the WNE even further.

But it’s probably better that I no longer work for a corporate media company. One of the most satisfying parts of my job was ending the day talking to a rival reporter over a beverage and sharing how we either scooped or were scooped by the other. We’d also play some mind games by hinting about what we were working on next, but not sharing enough information so the other could figure it out.

It was fun. And it provided a way for us to cope with the fact we weren’t getting rich doing our jobs, but we always knew the next day the competition would continue. I think some cooperation is good, and today perhaps even necessary.

But beating a friend or a rival to a story? Priceless.

Kerry Drake

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The Denver Post, now owned by an money grubbing hedge fund, is also publishing stories from other smaller newspapers throughout Colorado. The saddest part is there is no longer an editorial page that published opinions ,some by local writers, or Letters t o the Editor. So we subscribers are faced with canceling the paper and perhaps feeling responsible for its demise or continuing to subscribe to what has become a more or less worthless rag. . Fortunately we have The Colorado Independent online, which is a bitim like Wyofile though more ruthlessly political , with a weekly report on the race for Governor by Mike Littwin who is our Kerry Drake. Also the Trumpian tariffs on newsprint are threatening good small papers like the Leadville Herald Democrat which has been a prize- winning small paper since rocks were young. I do think online papers will help but they will need to charge to stay alive and what about movie reviews and shortcake recipes ?

  2. Nothing stays the same and it is interesting to watch how things change.
    Luke 5:39 ” No one after dinking old wine wants the new, for he says, ‘The old is better.'”
    (One of the few Bible verses that is true and applicable for today)

  3. I wholly agree the demise of thoughtful, in-depth, local reporting has left us less knowledgeable and much less engaged with our government and communities. The Wyoming News Exchange strikes me as a great way to supplement quality outlets like WyoFile and AP. Good luck with that, Jim, and thanks for the flashback, Kerry. Sure miss those days.

  4. A milennia or more from now, an archaeologist will discover a dry cave in the desert containing coffin-like containers full of newspapers and magazines.

    It will be like the second coming of the Dead Sea Scrolls… hard copies of our civilization preserved long after the digital storage devices have corroded away.

  5. Was there really a rivalry between the Eagle and the Tribune, since they were both owned by the McCracken family? It always seemed like a contrived arrangement to me, having a morning and evening paper with the same ownership.

  6. The ever-shrinking number of journalists in Wyoming is painful, and the absence of competition between papers (and other news outlets) does, indeed, leave me shaking my head and pining for days gone by.
    Stories shared by papers is inevitable, but as a result, I let my subscription to the Boomerang end this week. I can read shared stories in the CST or WTE, I suppose, but I’ll miss the UW coverage which the Boomerang provides on a near-daily basis.

    1. Chris, I have to remind you that The Associated Press has been facilitating the sharing of stories between newspapers for years. Did you really think that the volume of information produced by the AP came from its own reporters? No — in my experience, a large majority of the information you see credited to the AP comes from its member newspapers.
      The News Exchange is a smaller version of the same business model. We share news of statewide interest with the state’s newspapers. But we don’t deliver stories of local interest. And that’s why you should keep your Boomerang subscription. As you said yourself: “I’ll miss the UW coverage which the Boomerang provides on a near-daily basis.”
      Local newspapers provide local news. That’s why they’re doing relatively well compared to their national colleagues. Lovell residents don’t count on the New York Times or Wyoming Tribune Eagle for coverage of the Big Horn County commissioners. They trust the Lovell Chronicle and have more than 100 years.
      So my advice to you stands — keep your Boomerang subscription. You can never have too much information, right?