Sheridan County residents applauded state officials Thursday after they voted to reject a land swap near Dayton that would have put state-owned mountain-front acreage in private hands in exchange for a sagebrush prairie lot.

The Wyoming Board of Land Commissioners voted 3-1 in favor of Auditor Kristi Racines’ motion to reject the Columbus Peak Ranch exchange proposal. State Treasurer Curt Meier cast the lone vote in favor of the swap.

Secretary of State Chuck Gray and Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder joined Racines to kill the exchange as proposed. Gov. Mark Gordon, chairman of the board, did not vote. He did not offer an explanation, but rules allow him to abstain when there is not a tie vote among the other commission members.

The Columbus Peak Ranch could again propose an exchange of property near Dayton, according to discussion at the land commissioners’ meeting in Casper, but any new swap would have to contain different parameters.

Who said what

Dayton Mayor Cliff Reed noted the overwhelming public opposition that has dogged the exchange since it was proposed in 2019.

“I was elected to represent my people … a small town of 850,” he said. He asked the commissioners “to represent the people that put forth all this information … bringing it out from the darkness.”

The values of the exchange parcels — 560 acres of state trust foothills property that would be swapped for 628 acres of Columbus Peak prairie property — should be obvious and clear, critic Rick Clark told the commission. He argued that appraisals, paid for by Columbus Peak Ranch, are off base and that the proposal won‘t achieve the aim of increasing revenue to Wyoming’s trust.

Without clarity in the appraisals, “there is no clear long-term benefit to the trust,” Clark said.

Columbus Peak Ranch member Russ Matthews commended Dayton area residents for their tenacious attitude. “For over three years, they’ve put up all kinds of objections, which have mostly been debunked,” he said.

“Every time their ideas are debunked, they come up with a new one,” Matthews said. “This certainly just seems to me like a delay game.”

Why it matters

The state foothills parcel lies in rolling country regularly used by elk and deer within two miles of public national forest land west of Dayton in Sheridan County. The private Columbus Peak Ranch property is 7 miles from the national-forest-managed mountains, east of Dayton, and near a highway and utilities that make it more compatible for development.

State legislators from the Dayton-Sheridan region opposed the exchange in a 2021 letter. Sheridan County commissioners and the Dayton Town Council also opposed the exchange. Efforts to negotiate a compromise among critics and the Columbus Peak Ranch failed.

History

Appraisers calculate the value of the state’s 560-acre foothill property between $3.36 million and $3.53 million. The 628-acre private parcel owned by Columbus Peak is valued between $2.64 million and $2.98 million.

Columbus Peak Ranch would have made up the difference in the value of the exchange parcels with a “Cash Equalization Payment,” plus as much as $295,000 extra, for a total CEP of $800,000. Treasurer Meier, who advocated for the exchange during the 90-minute meeting, said Columbus’ Peak would give even more.

“Mr. Matthews has said … in a private conversation … that he might be able to sweeten that pot a little bit to 880,000 [dollars],” Meier said.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Some things just aren’t for sale. Want more money? no problem, I’ll raise my cash to boot to $880,000. To the people out there with deep pockets, it’s only money………To the rest of us, it’s something else, something precious. Why is it so hard for our elected officials and the state land and trust office to see these blatant land swap offers for what they are.
    If they’re truly interested in increasing the revenue of state trust land, they should start being proactive in raising the grazing allotment rates. Just think how much time and energy has been spent since 2019………on something that should never have been considered in the first place.

    1. I don’t know why everyone is clapping their hands for our “elected” officials. All they have done is uphold their oathes to office. The expectation of a toddler is to learn to use the potty without critical acclaim. Baby steps, I guess.

  2. Hooray! The system (so far) is working. What we need now is a great American novel to show how the good people of Sheridan County, WY were able to keep their treasured access to a special place. Writing contest anyone?

  3. Boo Hoo to you, Mr. Ross ‘married into the Holding/Sinclair money’ Matthews and Boo to you, Wyoming Treasurer Curt Meier for trying to cut a side deal with the Holding clan. Wyomingites aren’t for sale

  4. Kudos to our elected officials in denying this very questionable land swap request. Weather it be our public lands or our public wildlife there is always someone out there looking for an angle !! Not sure where Mr Meier veered off his apparent opposition stance from 4 years ago, but it was an unfortunate path he chose. At least the others listened to the public’s cry. Elected officials whether they be State, County, or City are placeholders, put there to represent the majority of the people. Sometimes decisions are easily made but others require farsighted thought. Some decisions can never be reversed – as is the case of selling/swapping off our public lands. Plenty of individuals are loaded today and the State could sell all our public lands in a heartbeat. Outdoor recreation would be left to a small percentage of well healed individuals, most likely from out of state !! Let’s hope this same scenario doesn’t happen again too soon in your neck-of-the-woods….