Cheatgrass, an invasive plant that's overtaking western landscapes. (Jennifer Strickland/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/FlickrCC)

Some of us with deep roots in Wyoming were raised to vote for the best candidate rather than party. As a kid, I stuffed campaign envelopes for Republicans and Democrats. My parents supported people from different parties and taught me to be proud of Wyoming for electing excellence in character.  

Opinion

So, it made me feel sick when the attack postcard against Cody mayor and House District 24 hopeful Matt Hall arrived in my mail. Kind of like watching cheatgrass make its way over our foothills, it twists my gut. The card was full of red flags — polarizing propaganda that should not find a purchase in our common-sense culture.   

The flyer claimed that Mayor Hall was woke. When I hear “woke” used these days, it sounds like a polarizing term, the tar and feathers of a conservative criticism of liberals. It was meant to deliver a fatal blow to Hall’s candidacy without a single piece of local evidence to support the charge. So how did it happen that the word “woke” is used to divide people into “us” vs. “them?” It is odd that being awake is considered bad. 

Woke began as a term used by American parents out of concern for their children. Black kids were in danger of being treated with cruelty or disrespect that could hurt their souls or escalate to threaten their lives.  Their parents would tell their kids to “stay woke” when moving in public. These parents knew that their children could not be carefree — they had to always cultivate situational awareness.  

This is an American term, born out of the American experience. I feel for any parent who knows that their child has a target on their back either for their class, the color of their skin or the shape of their eyes. Looking at American history, “woke” means that a person is aware that Americans walk in this world with different degrees of power. That parents need to arm their children with caution according to the targets on their backs. 

If we look past the cheatgrass of an anonymous flyer that calls someone woke and examine our roots, we remember that when Wyoming wrote its constitution it was the most woke state of the region. It gave women the right to vote. To be from Wyoming meant to work for equality. 

The flyer also photoshopped a picture of Matt Hall kneeling next to top Democrats Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. When propaganda ties a lifelong Republican like Hall to Pelosi, it’s just hogwash. The people writing the smear have no local evidence to criticize. In the cut out of Mayor Hall on the mailer, you don’t see the police chief who was next to him on that day the photo was taken, and who spoke with integrity and strength about the responsibility the police have with their powers to use force. 

The authors of the flyer don’t know us, nor do they care about us. They are mocking the idea that black lives are grievable and tarring Hall for showing respect for a legal principle of justice for all here in Cody.  

It’s time to return to our roots. Otherwise, the Wyoming we were raised in politically is going to get taken over with this empty cheatgrass. It debases our local memories and community spirit. 

Mary L Keller was raised in Wyoming and lives in Cody where she writes and teaches. She studies the Indigenous stories that preceded her in Sundance and Cody, organizes the annual Return to Foretop’s...

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Certainly one of the better opinions I have read in WyoFile. One can never express their position, beliefs, values or principles with a single word. This is particularly true in America, where the meaning of words can shift like the wind in Wyoming.

    I would never let a political mailer twist my gut, because I know that the political slick is intended to appeal to the lowest common denominator. These are put out by all sides. Many of my friends will use “woke” to say something about a candidates political leaning. Just as many who may respond to this opinion would say that I support the “Freedumb” caucus. The one word political pejorative, is rampant in a more politically contentious world.

    Here is a list for you:
    Conservative
    Radical
    Liberal
    Moderate
    Far-right
    Republican
    Democrat
    Lies
    Truth

    In a political slick, those words mean nothing to me. I always do my own research.

    I see these words in a political slick and it never will twist my gut. I collect them, put em in an envelope of the seasons political mail (Primary 2024). Probably will have all of that delivered to Suzy at the Wyoming Archives upon my death so that the history is preserved.

    The only way you will know where someone stands is to talk with them. listen to their words and read their writing.

    This political season, I got the strangest piece of campaign mail. A one page letter in an envelope. It was written by the candidates wife. It was essentially a love note. Granted, there was a passing one sentence reference to her husband running for a legislative seat. But the point of the letter was her love for him.

    A few days later, I am talking with that candidate and he asks me, “what did you think of the letter?” I said I read the letter and said “it was the strangest damn piece of campaign mail I had ever gotten”. I asked him if he heard from people in the neighborhoods he walks to talk with voters, if he had feedback on the letter. He said YES. He said the feedback was positive and it really turned a number of voters opinions. I, of course, saved the letter with a ton of slicks and other political nonsense.

    Keep doing what you are doing Mary. Don’t let a single word twist your gut. Know yourself, and try to know the candidate. They will often let you down anyway.

    By the way, the candidate with the love letter… won a very contentious race… by a just a few votes.

  2. When I looked up the biblical meaning of “woke” I found that it meant ‘being awakened to the plight of your brothers.’ Seems to me that this would be what a politician would aspire to if they were in service to their constituents.

  3. Anytime I hear a Wyoming Republican bragging about their party having a strong grassroots base, I presume that’s Cheatgrass…

  4. “It is odd that being awake is considered bad.”

    This is about as insightful as remarking that it’s weird that conservatives oppose liberal policies since “liberal” means to be free. Who would rightly oppose freedom, amirite? Weird.

    Let’s not pretend the mailer was criticizing Hall for being awake. Instead, being “woke” in the context of the mailer means harboring certain mainly progressive ideas such as that 1) the history of the world is best understood through the lens of oppressor/oppressed (Marx) 2) the USA is systemically racist (as opposed to a nation that systematically tries to eliminate the human evil of racism by its fundamental ideas) 3) people from different races cannot possibly understand each other and must be separated and referred to by distinct political communities (and to the extent a black scholar – Coleman Hughes, Glenn Loury, Thomas Sowell, John McWhorter – criticize “woke” theory – they are simply not actually part of the real “black community” – a group defined primarily by white liberals) 4) men can be women 5) the scientific method is on par with an individual’s “voice” (don’t question black voices!) ; “lived experience”, “traditional ways of knowing” 6) he or she who controls the meaning of words controls the universe (hence all the renaming stuff – women are “birthing people”, “woke just means awake”, etc.) 7) on and on.

    I received a similar mailer too picturing Matt kneeling in the middle of a blacks live matter demonstration and although it seemed like a cheap shot, the ideology put forward in those demonstrations, the symbolism behind taking a knee – these seem to be eminently proper items of civil discourse. It’s not as if the flyers criticize Matt for skiing in jeans or something. And believing that someone supports black lives matter seems like a fair inference to draw when the person is seen at a black lives matter demonstration making the gesture adopted by the black lives matter movement to show solidarity with the movement. Some people have remarked “everyone was kneeling!” but it’s not like Matt was at dinner with friends who happen to be satanists and is pictured politely clasping hands as they pray to satan while Matt inwardly prays to leave. A political demonstration is something one does not usually accidentally wind up at, much less so taking the gesture adopted by the demonstrators.

    The black lives matter movement is seen by many, esp. conservatives, to be fundamentally and conceptually wrong. And from my own perspective, the movement has actually had a retrogressive effect in two key respects 1) it’s hardened the view that officers should be entitled to qualified immunity. (Racism , excess budgets, weaponry do not motivate police misconduct nearly as much as a complete lack of accountability.) 2) equal protection of the laws (most BLM supporters believe that if our law recognizes races and makes difference among races (i.e. present discrimination), past discrimination can be minimized.)

    If participation was a mistake or regrettable, it seems easy enough to state that. But this opinion piece seems more disappointed that some Wyoming voters would consider a person’s alliance with BLM (a movement of vast social and political consequence) a disadvantage, rather than disappointed with probability/sufficiency of the inference to be drawn from the mailer. It’s also interesting to begin the piece with the importance of choosing the best candidate regardless of party. I think Matt is only facing a republican challenger, so the comment makes me wonder if this piece is actually just expressing regret that voters have correctly identified Matt as the more liberal/democratic candidate, in part because of a photo taken of him seemingly supporting a movement that most Wyoming voters criticize? Photos count as evidence, don’t they?

  5. Wyoming politics is the worst. Even our so-called federal reps are disingenuous. Mr. Barrasso says he and Trump will stop migration at the border. How funny. Mr. Barrasso has been a senator since when, 2007? Why didn’t he stop it then. Hageman and Lummis are election deniers, disrespecting the voters.

  6. The politics of hate and name calling continues to divide us. Empathy and love for your fellow man is demonized in this ugly new world.