This commentary was originally published by Writers on the Range.
Opinion
Last summer, hunters and anglers stepped up in a huge way to help defeat a proposal by Utah Sen. Mike Lee to sell off millions of acres of public land.
In the end, public land defenders won. Confronted by an outpouring of grassroots opposition, Lee removed his amendment to the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill.” But the struggle demonstrated that we need to act sooner.
Four elk hunters in Wyoming showed us what stepping up can look like. Instead of sitting back and looking sadly at a huge chunk of prime elk country blocked by a billionaire’s ranch, they built a special ladder. By climbing over it, they crossed from one corner of public land to another, setting in motion a legal process that freed up millions of acres of public land in six states.
They also shot some nice bulls.
The hunters’ creativity in the field has become an inspiration. That’s why the two of us — state legislators in Wyoming and Montana — are teaming up to fight for public land access, just as the hunters on Wyoming’s Elk Mountain did.
Across the West, millions of acres of public land are still legally open but practically inaccessible. At checkerboard corners where public and private land meet, a person can stand on public ground, look directly at more public ground just an inch away, and still be told they cannot step from one to the other.
In Wyoming, the question of corner crossing dragged through the courts for years. Last October, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a case challenging a lower court decision allowing corner crossing. The ruling establishes that crossing between public land corners without touching private property does not constitute trespass.
That means corner crossing remains legal in the 10th Circuit states of Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico.
In other states, a legal grey area remains.
In Montana, Gov. Greg Gianforte and the director of Fish, Wildlife and Parks say that corner crossing remains unlawful under state law. That declaration puts political clout behind the status quo, where public land remains accessible to those who can buy control of key parcels and hire fancy attorneys.
The consequences are not abstract. For working families in Montana and Wyoming, access to public land is a necessity, not a luxury. It is how people put meat in the freezer as grocery prices rise. It is how parents take their kids outdoors without paying fees. It is how rural communities hold on to traditions that are increasingly out of reach.
We, as elected leaders, need to act. We can’t let confusing court decisions or laws that don’t serve the people be the last word on any issue dealing with public land.
That’s why the two of us support state legislation in both Wyoming and Montana that will clarify the law and protect public access. The stakes are high and rising. Land prices have become astronomically out of reach for most people, outside wealth continues to pour into our states, and politicians in Congress and our state legislatures increasingly side with wealthy landowners.
Unless public land supporters in office act to clarify corner crossing in law, access will continue to shrink. The result will be a two-tiered system: a West for people who can afford exclusive access and another West that’s diminished for everyone else.
Corner crossing may be ingenious, but it is not radical. It is a straightforward affirmation that public land needs to be available to the public. We don’t think this is a partisan issue. Hunters, anglers, hikers, conservationists, landowners, and working families span every political stripe in our states. Fair access to public land for future generations is a shared value.
The choice ahead is simple. We can defend public land as a public right for our children and grandchildren, or we can allow the West to slide toward a situation where those with wealth continue to block vast swaths of public land.
As legislators from Montana and Wyoming, we know which side we are on.
The writers are contributors to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conservation about the West.

If you want a better state, vote more Democrats into office. The people that support us is obvious. By the way, I see Dumpy polls show that most Americans think Biden was a better president. That is also obvious.
Representative Provenza really stands with the everyday Wyomingite she has proven it time and time again. Public lands is very important to all the sports folks in the state and the country really. Wyoming voters really need to look inward and see why you would vote for folks that would sell your public lands. or turn them over for coal oil and gas to do whatever they want. Cutting off migration routes for wildlife destroying wildlife habitat for instance, sage grouse if you look at the reality and the politics of public lands, it is Republicans that want to sell it. Democrats want to keep it for the people. it is a Wyoming democrat and a Montana democrat who is fighting for your public lands and you should thank them. I am very grateful They are stepping forward as you don’t see any MAGA stepping forward.
Thank you, Representative Provenza, for looking out for us regular folks in our use and enjoyment of public lands.
Thanks to both of you for working hard for public land access for ordinary land-loving citizens. Coordinating efforts with Montana, is a critical step moving forward, as MT unfortunately was not part of the 10th Circuit States decision. Keep up the great work…hoping MT elects a public lands champion (and user) for their new governor.
Hunting is slowly transforming into a “sport” for the wealthy elite/Kings. Access to land is essential for the commoners to still get a chance to put meat in their family’s freezer.
For many including my self, especially now with inflationary pressure on store bought protein/meat , hunting is the primary source to get freezers filled. This isnt about Boone and Crockett points or “reconnecting with nature” after working a finance job in some metropolis, this about survival.
The increasing limitations on meat hunters are on multiple fronts, access to land, costs for gear/supplies/competition for tags needed, and declining animal populations in the Western US.
Protecting public access should be a priority in any State where public lands seem never ending but are increasingly restricted.
Very well put. I would be supportive of meaningful discussion that results in simple solutions to removing road blocks to accessing public lands.