Members of the House and Senate voted Monday to overwhelmingly approve a general fund budget of about $2.8 billion for the 2023-24 biennium. The budget, still subject to line-item vetoes by Gov. Mark Gordon, is roughly $400 million smaller than the budget approved two years ago.

Some of the decreases in spending out of the general fund are offset by federal COVID-19 relief funding, legislators serving on the Joint Appropriations Committee have noted. After receiving recommendations from the governor, the JAC is the body primarily tasked with forging the budget.

Despite having the smallest general fund expenditures since 2010, this year’s budget is the product of one of the most amicable negotiation back-and-forths between the House and Senate in recent memory.

“This was probably the easiest and least controversial budget in the eight years that I’ve served on Appropriations, so I would commend our folks down the hall,” said JAC Co-chairman Rep. Bob Nicholas (R-Cheyenne). “Whenever we had an issue, typically our process was to come to compromise rather than fight, bully-up and cram one thing down the other’s side. It was a very friendly atmosphere and our conference committee went very smoothly.”

After each chamber amended the budget bill earlier in the session, the House and Senate were split on about $46 million in spending a week ago.

Rep. Bob Nicholas (R-Cheyenne) in the Wyoming State Capitol in February 2022. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

To strike a compromise, the House agreed to cut a $10-million amendment that would’ve funded sidewalks and other non-motorized pathways around the state. Senators “had their feet in concrete on this particular issue,” Nicholas said.

The House also conceded its $5-million amendment to provide a “13th check” to retirees in the state pension program for the upcoming year. That amendment was designed as a one-time cost-of-living adjustment.

Sen. Larry Hicks (R-Baggs) was concerned more payments in the state retirement program could create insolvency concerns like those the state has faced with its “Fire A” pension plan for firefighters, he said.

“After everything we went through with Fire A, we were concerned a little bit that we were going down the wrong path there,” Hicks said. “The fund looks solvent, but at one point, Fire A looked solvent too.”

After the Wyoming Retirement System warned in 2020 that the Fire A pension was set to run out of money in five years, the Legislature approved $75 million in funding for the pension this session.

The Senate’s biggest concession in the final budget bill came in the form of retaining the House’s position to provide a $9.3-million cost-of-living increase for teachers and $64.8-million in pay raises for state employees. The pay increase for teachers will come out of the school foundation account, while the latter will be paid out of the general fund.

Gordon has stressed the state’s stagnant wages are making it difficult to recruit and retain quality employees.

The budget bill originally approved by the Senate would’ve included $54 million — $10.8 million less — for employees paid by the general fund.

This year’s budget talks were imbued with less tension than in previous years, when the divide between the House and Senate led to dramatic standoffs. In 2019, the Senate suspended its rules to introduce backup bills after now-retired Sen. Eli Bebout (R-Riverton) — then JAC co-chairman — said he wouldn’t support the existing supplemental budget bill. In the 2020 budget session, the Legislature failed to fund any new construction projects after the House and Senate couldn’t agree on which projects to fund.

Gordon now has three days to make line-item vetoes to the budget. Because the Legislature’s budget session continues through Friday, legislators will have the opportunity to override any potential vetoes with a two-thirds vote.

The budget bill passed the Senate on a 20-9 vote and the House on a 41-14 vote.

Daniel Bendtsen is a freelance journalist living in Green River. He previously spent five years working at the Riverton Ranger and Laramie Boomerang. Originally from the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, Bendtsen...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It is hopeful to hear that WY legislators were able to navigate the budget process with less acrimony than in past years. We all need some reason to be hopeful right now. Thanks for the reporting.

  2. “This years budget talks were imbued with less tension” and 2019 and 2020 were noted as challenging sessions. Representative Harshman was speaker of the house 2017-2020. Evidently thing work better when tradition is respected and the speaker serves only one term as speaker.
    $400 million smaller with teacher raises, sounds like solid work. Wish our federal government worked as well.