U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz told western governors the world is on a path away from fossil fuels and is not turning back. He also reminded them his agency has $40 billion in loans on the table, some of which is earmarked for finding ways to make fossil fuels less polluting. (David Swift/Western Governors' Association)

JACKSON — U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz told western governors in Jackson on Monday that nobody predicted how quickly low natural gas prices would upend the coal industry.

Speaking at the Western Governors’ Association annual meeting, Moniz said the looming question for experts had been whether low gas prices would affect renewable energy industry — not coal. Proliferation of hydraulic fracturing has uncorked a surfeit of natural gas upsetting the traditional energy market’s fuel mix.

“Are low natural gas prices going to drive out renewables?” Moniz said of the conventional thinking. “The facts are, [the energy industry sectors] low natural gas prices have actually hit hard are coal and nuclear.”

Moreover, change came quickly. “No one predicted the speed we have seen,” he said.

The tide won’t reverse, Moniz warned. “There is essentially an inevitability in this direction,” he said of the move toward cleaner and low-carbon fuels.

Nevertheless, the Obama administration recognizes western governors’ desire to advance carbon capture and storage projects. The association wrote key U.S. Senators earlier this month supporting the responsible use of carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery.

“We are putting a strong emphasis on innovation in carbon capture and storage,” Moniz said. “Fossil-fuel use, nuclear, along with renewables and efficiencies, all will remain prominent in our portfolio. There’s no way around the fact we are on the pathway to a significant transformation. Our job is to turn this into opportunity.”

“It would be crazy for us not to emphasize our innovation edge,” Moniz said.

Gov. Matt Mead asked whether the Department of Energy’s loans and grants were going toward renewables or fossil fuels.

The remaining $40 billion authorized in the Loan Programs Office for the next five years is earmarked largely by legislation, Moniz said. About $8.5 billion is dedicated for fossil fuel research and only $4.5 billion — the smallest amount — for renewables and efficiency. Sixteen billion dollars are proposed for advanced technology vehicles manufacturing and $12 billion for nuclear research.

Gov. Mead also quizzed Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell on her agency’s review of the federal coal leasing program. Noting that some environmental impact statements take 10 years to complete, he wondered whether her three-year goal for a coal document was realistic.

One wind-energy company has spent $100 million, Mead said, “and they haven’t done anything but go through the regulatory process. Similarly, coal mines — “they don’t make investments overnight.”

Mead disagrees with the review process, he said. Since it is underway, “the timing is important to us.”

Jewell said she believes the three-year deadline can be met. She noted also that there is a 20 year supply of coal already leased and mechanisms in place for emergency provisions.

Jewell said states can help “in not delaying” the federal review. “We are reluctant to extend comment periods [in order] to keep on track,” she said.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I say he is Full of IT. They ALL knew there was a coming switch because even they can’t see the mtns for the “haze”. Someday, someone was going to say, “Hey! What are doing to our air, land, waters?!” They just wanted to push the switch as far back as possible to gain as much money as possible. Even natural gas will have an end date. WY people need to make the change for themselves because greed has a hold of all the others making the decisions. Good Luck man 🙁