Rod Lerwick, front left, sits with Ty Lerwick and Keith Lerwick, back, during a contested hearing over their applications to drill eight high-capacity irrigation wells in Laramie County. The Lerwicks aren’t convinced that claims their development will harm ground- and surface-water sources on their neighbors’ properties are true, they said. (Joel Funk/WyoFile)

State Engineer Brandon Gebhart has decided not to hear additional oral arguments in a fight over pumping large volumes of groundwater from the Ogallala Aquifer under the Laramie County Control Area.

Opponents of a Laramie County family’s plans to drill and pump from eight high-capacity wells wanted to argue their case in front of Gebhart, who took his post in February. Members of the Lerwick family, who seek permits for the agricultural wells, opposed a new hearing. A consortium of neighboring ranchers and farmers are fighting the permit requests.

Those neighbors believed Gebhart’s late entry into the yearslong conflict merited a new round of oral arguments to help him get up to speed with the voluminous case record.

Who said what

Gebhart signed an order rejecting the hearing request April 13 after “having carefully considered” motions, responses and replies on the oral argument issue.

“The administrative record in this matter is voluminous and includes many records from this office,” Gebhart wrote, including “the transcripts from three days of hearings … significant briefing [and] capable legal advocacy…” He told WyoFile earlier this month he wants to make sure he understands the issue completely and gives the high-priority case the attention it deserves. He has no timeline or schedule, he wrote in an email.

In his order declining to hear oral arguments, Gebhart also acknowledged what one attorney said is some 5,000 pages of documents. He is “mindful of the significant time and expense the parties have already invested in this matter,” Gebhart’s order reads.

Why it matters

The state engineer created a control area in 1981 to protect diminishing levels of the High Plains or Ogallala Aquifer, allowing public scrutiny and protest of hew high-capacity water wells. A decision on whether to permit the proposed wells — which would be drilled within the control area — could be precedent-setting, some believe.

Allowing new extractions from the water table could diminish flows in springs and creeks and from existing wells in the area. That could threaten long-held water rights, well opponents have said.

History

Hydrogeologist George Moser, who worked with the State Engineer’s groundwater division, in November recommended conditional approval of the permits. Among the conditions in his 101-page report and proposed order are that the Lerwicks not pump up more than could be beneficially used for irrigation.The Lerwicks applied for the well permits in 2019 and defended their request in a three-day contested case hearing in Cheyenne last year. An advisory board recommended against the permits, a non-binding recommendation Moser did not follow as he forwarded the issue to Gebhart, the ultimate decider.

Angus M. Thuermer Jr. is the natural resources reporter for WyoFile. He is a veteran Wyoming reporter and editor with more than 35 years experience in Wyoming. Contact him at angus@wyofile.com or (307)...

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. In Canada, Ogallala watched to anticipate implementation of NAWAPA. And US invasion? Definitely climate refugees.

    .

    Reply
  2. Reply

  3. To what does “pump up more than could be beneficially used for irrigation” refer? Is there a use other than irrigation proposed for the water being pumped?

    Reply
    1. Reply
  4. Reply