Our Lame Duck Not So Lame

I think Dave has enjoyed being Governor.  He’s had a nice run.  For the most part his agency  appointments have been competent and not afflicted with Blagojevich cronyism; his judicial appointments are beyond reproach; after the luxury of being awash with mineral revenue, he anticipated the budget crunch a little bit before it happened.  He spent money like a drunken sailor and made the Republicans take the blame.  Of course, the Republicans in the Wyoming legislature, like their kin in Congress, eagerly spend money on what their constituents desire while despairing of big government and big spending.

Don’t think I bought it all; I have some significant disagreements with some of Gov Dave’s policies, but that is not the point here.

Lately The Sage Grouse, yet to be cited in a White House briefing or Wall Street Journal front page piece, has put the mud to the faces of a few Wyoming Republican candidates; deservedly so, for after all, they were down in the mud with the pigs, searching for muck instead of answers.  The Sage Grouse accused most of them of playing a “Let’s Pretend” game of ignoring reality in search of banality.

Then, on Thursday, June 17, GOP candidate Colin Simpson candidly admitted that the federal government (that’s you and me) does own Yellowstone Park and various national forests, and that there ain’t much we voters can do about that.  Maybe Colin is listening to The Sage Grouse.  If not, maybe he should.  Maybe Colin is not succumbing to the “Let’s Pretend” philosophy.  Let’s watch.

And on Thursday, when the seas parted and the skies changed from black to blue, Gov Dave, not admitting to post partum depression, spoke to the candidates: you Republicans, fixated on rhetoric and base pandering, have no policies or positions or specifics on real issues.  I thought maybe Gov Dave had been reading The Sage Grouse.

I will be waiting for the telephone to ring.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Gov. Freudenthal has indeed been a good governor; however, it is much easier to be a good governor when the state is awash in funds as Wyoming has been for at least 6 of his 8 years. State government has grown by leaps and bounds and that means that somebody (mostly the mineral industry) has to pay for that growth. If either cap-and-trade or a carbon tax are enacted, the funding picture for Wyoming could change quite dramatically. What seems to be lost in the ballyhoo about independence from fossil fuels is that our economy is energized by fossil fuels. Make fossil fuels more expensive and what happens to the economy? Would we suddenly find ourselves in the midst of a double-dip recession? Hopefully, elected persons in Washington, D.C. will exercise some judgment instead of listening to the environmentalists screaming wolf as they have done for the past 3 decades. I don’t foresee either good judgement in Washington, D.C. or ceasing of environmental racket. After all, environmental organizations live by begging and they have to shriek to get gullible people to untie their purse strings.

    Reply

  2. Good comments. Dave has been a pretty good governor. What about the woman running for Governor? What is she saying?

    Reply
  3. Reply