Senate Medicaid expansion bill faces next challenge in committee

By Ron Feemster
— February 14, 2014

Ron Feemster, WyoFile reporter
Ron Feemster, WyoFile reporter

The staged Medicaid expansion bill proposed by Sen. Chris Rothfuss (D-Laramie) was introduced in the Senate Friday by a vote of 21-9 to the surprise of many advocates who spent the last year pushing other bills that failed.

The bill, Senate File 118, was written to be a broad compromise that incorporated ideas from a wide variety of bills with diverse supporters. The bill had 16 co-sponsors from both chambers.

Health advocates and Medicaid supporters outside the Senate chamber were amazed as they looked over the roll call vote. The same Senate defeated a simple Medicaid expansion bill last year by a vote of 20-10. Medicaid expansion picked up 11 votes in a year, at least for introduction.

“It took a little bit of work,” Rothfuss told WyoFile. “I think there were a lot of people in the Senate that were interested in bringing it to debate, not supporting expansion, but the opportunity to discuss it. I appreciate that.”

The bill will get an energetic reworking in committees and on the floor of both houses, according to legislators who did not want to disclose their plans for the bill on the record.

“I’m sure we’ll amend it in committee,” one House member whispered. But for that member, and others who tried to draft a successful Medicaid expansion bill this year, even hoping to see the bill in the House is optimistic.

Rep. Eric Barlow (R-Gillette) presented House Bill 161, a Medicaid expansion bill that he designed to be palatable to a broad spectrum of lawmakers. The bill was defeated by a vote of 33-25 several hours after SF 118 was introduced.

The Senate assigned SF 118 to its Labor Health committee, which is chaired by Sen. Charles Scott (R-Casper). The chairman said Thursday that he is staunchly opposed to the bill. Scott is fed up with the Affordable Care Act in general, and said the Senate’s overall dissatisfaction with the ACA led to the defeat of his “Obamacare Relief” bill 19-11.

Sen. Charles Scott (R-Casper)
Sen. Charles Scott (R-Casper)

“I don’t think you could pass any Medicaid expansion bill this year,” Scott said.

Scott is the gatekeeper on all health care legislation that moves through the Senate. He voted against this bill as well as another, which he himself authored.

“I hope we’ll be able to have a robust discussion in the Senate Labor committee and hopefully bring it to the floor,” Rothfuss said. “There have been all new topics, new areas of policy discussion since last year when we debated it in the floor.”

Last year’s Medicaid Expansion bill nearly died in the Labor Health committee, which Scott chairs. But Scott decided to pass it out of committee to the Senate Floor with a “do not pass” recommendation.

Many people have fought for Medicaid expansion since the 2013 session ended. They might be happy with that same outcome in Labor Health again this year.

— WyoFile reporter Gregory Nickerson contributed to this story.

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. A truly worthless comment which adds nothing to the discussion. How does this get posted? Please WyoFile, apply your comments code.

  2. Has anyone noticed that Charlie Scott has that same “l’etat, c’est moi” look that Dick Cheney has?

    RH