Sage Grouse

Skin Tones

CNN’s Anderson Cooper has been interviewing children and experts about “white bias” expressed by both white and black children about skin color. Children of both races, and mixed race, say that white children are better looking, more popular with teachers, more likeable and smarter than children with dark skin.

This, 55 years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered desegregation in Brown v. Board of Education. Some things change slower than glaciers.

I attended segregated schools in the Mississippi delta from 1957 to 1960. A third-grader does not spend a lot of time contemplating legal concepts, but I did wonder why the black kids walked in one direction toward a very new school while I walked the other to an old building, populated by white kids so poor they were barefoot, their clothes were ripped and torn, and many of them had ringworm and other diseases with visible symptoms. Those are things I remember.

We moved to Wyoming in 1961, in part because my father was trying to integrate his Presbyterian church in Indianola, Miss. I have written about this before. Things were tense and death threats were made (“we know where your son walks to school”), mostly by the parents of those kids with no shoes and ringworm.

We next arrived in 1961 in Buffalo, Wyo., where segregation was largely an irrelevant concept. There are Basques in Buffalo, some of whom have olive complexions and nearly all of whom have unusual names like Auzqui and Bordarrampe and Esponda, but no one thinks they are different except that some of them can speak the ancient language and many of them prefer sheep to cattle. Or used to. The only discrimination in Buffalo is that families who have lived there for many decades don’t welcome newcomers all that readily. Race, gender, color, don’t really matter.

Later, attending college in St. Paul, Minn., I participated in voter registration drives in the inner city. At Macalester College, the most liberal college in the Midwest if not the whole country, I occasionally helped a friend by filling in as a midnight desk clerk in one of the dorms. One night a bunch of black students walked into the dorm and decided to “mau-mau” the white dude manning the gate. It got noisy — loud dancing and screaming, pointing and threatening — verging on violent. It probably did not help that I yawned. What irony; My family left the South due to white supremacist death threats, and I end up in a narrow hallway at a liberal college which granted generous scholarships to these inner-city students, and they were mau-mauing me. They eventually tired of the sport and left.

There are events in every person’s life which leave marks and generate lasting resentment. This was not one of those. This was a cheap shot, not important, and has long since faded away. Black people might be entitled to be grumpy about historical abuse, and justify heaping abuse upon white people as a fair compensation. I wrote off the experience of six big African -American dudes dancing and threatening me as blowing off steam. Some people might not.

Scene change: Wyoming. Not many people in Wyoming lived in the Mississippi delta, or registered voters in inner-city anywhere, or were mau-maued at college. It is much easier to cultivate resentment of little wrongs, or perceived unfair advantages, than to transcend them. I no longer frequent several restaurants and bars in Gillette because I can’t stand to hear the “n” word used in reference to our president; I probably should inform the proprietors that they are losing my business.

But how sad it is that children of color, as reported by Anderson Cooper, keep believing that white children are better looking, smarter, more likely to succeed. Is that true on the Wind River Reservation? It’s hard to talk about transcending differences when the damage is done during the earliest formative years.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. There are sane people in the country, and our voices need to be heard over the predominant din of voices that appear to be taking over the country and seem to be motivated by partisanship, selfishness, greed, racism, intolerance, ignorance and several other classical sins that escape me at the moment. Thanks for continuing to try to restore sanity. We shouldn’t need rallies to do so!

  2. Thank you , for a smart and intersting article. I wish I knew the places in Gillette where people still feel this way. As a friend put this to me, “He still is the President of the U.S.”. Jean Adams

  3. Thank you
    Often your writing brings a smile to my face or fires up a few brain cells that need to a nudge to wake up. This piece touched my heart.
    Here I am in Portland Oregon reading Wyofile because 2 years ago a client of mine from Wyoming starting sending it my way. I always look forward to reading your column. Please keep writing, your voice makes a difference.
    Sincerely, Nura Khan