Two Elk Saga: A note on sources and acknowledgements

This series is based on a broad review of public records and on dozens of interviews conducted since January 2011 in person, by telephone, or through email correspondence in 11 states — Wyoming, Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, Utah, California, Montana, Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, West Virginia — and Washington, D.C.

Among the documents reviewed were Department of Energy invoices obtained under the Freedom of Information Act; quarterly filings with the federal Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board; Colorado, California and Wyoming real estate assessment records; state and federal environmental filings; Colorado and California public utilities commission filings and transcripts of investigative hearings; state and federal tax-exempt industrial bond applications and correspondence; three voluminous bond sale transcripts and supporting documentation including detailed financial records; Internal Revenue Service audit reports and related correspondence with Wyoming county officials; federal Inspector General audit reports; paper and email correspondence between state and federal officials; state and federal campaign contribution reports; promotional materials and presentations by North American Power Group; and hundreds of articles in both general news and trade publications.

Among those interviewed were North American Power Group current and former employees, including NAPG president Michael J. Ruffatto and NAPG vice president Brad Enzi; former governors of Wyoming and Montana; a broad range of current and former Wyoming, California and Colorado officials, both elected and appointed, including members of relevant regulatory agencies and commissions; DOE supervisors and officials with the National Energy Technology Laboratory in Pittsburgh; ranchers with property adjacent to the Two Elk site; coal company land agents; and more than a dozen contractors, subcontractors and vendors, including engineers and scientists with expertise in the CO2 carbon sequestration field. Supplementally — for comparison purposes — I  interviewed a number of scientists, engineers, contractors and accountants with several stimulus-funded carbon sequestration site characterization projects similar to the Two Elk project.

Beginning in January 2012 after WyoFile reported that DOE had suspended the Two Elk stimulus grant, our numerous requests and appeals for additional documents under the Freedom of Information Act have been denied on the grounds that the case was the subject of  an “ongoing investigation” and “pending enforcement action.” I should note, however, that in nearly two years of interviews with dozens of people connected to the stimulus grant, I only encountered one individual who said he had been interviewed by federal investigators. That person, one of the principle contractors in the Two Elk stimulus grant, said he was questioned in person by an investigator with the National Energy Technology Laboratory. However, most of those whom I interviewed were eager to share what they knew. Several of those whom I attempted to interview said they were restricted in what they could say to me by corporate policy or non-disclosure contracts with NAPG, but volunteered that they would be happy and willing to talk about the Two Elk project if they were contacted by federal investigators.

Acknowledgements:

These stories were funded by a grant from the Fund for Investigative Journalism, Washington, D.C., and a generous donation from WyoFile co-founder and longtime patron Christopher Findlater, formerly of Cheyenne and now living in Miami, Fla. WyoFile board chair Anne MacKinnon, an outstanding journalist and expert on resources policy, offered several excellent suggestions for an early draft. My professional colleague John Lancaster and his wife Gail Walker graciously put me up in their Capitol Hill home during my Washington, D.C., reporting trip. My cousin Kim Tempest housed me in Denver and R.T. Cox hosted me in Gillette.

Special thanks go to the dozens of sources, named and unnamed, who volunteered hours of their time to help me understand the Two Elk Saga. It is proof once again that public service journalism is not possible without an engaged public.

Finally, this story would not have been possible without the loving support and diligent assistance of my wife, the writer and brilliant copy editor Laura Richardson.

— Rone Tempest

2009 grants
2009 Grants
Project _Summary-Abstract
Project Summary-Abstract
Two Elk Index of Documents in Archives
Two Elk Docket 1997-2014
carbon DOE FOA
Carbon Sequestration Awards 2009
IRS letters about audit
IRS Audit
DOE IG Audit March 2013
DOE IG Audit March 2013
Two Elk pay vouchers 2010-2011
Two Elk pay vouchers 2010-2011
Contributions to FREUDENTHAL, DAVE From ENZI, M BRADLEY _ Follow The Money
Mike Ruffato contributions to Freudenthal
Brad Enzi contribution to Freudenthal
Brad Enzi contribution to Freudenthal
Joan Ruffato contribution to  Freudenthal
Joan Ruffato contribution to Freudenthal
Etsi Coal Slurry Pipeline Proposal
Etsi Coal Slurry Pipeline Proposal
Many Stars CTL __ Project Overview
Many Stars CTL Project Overview

Rone Tempest was a longtime national and foreign correspondent for the Los Angeles Times. In 2004 he was part of a team of reporters to win the Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the massive wildfires in Southern...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *