Three separate satellites detected a large methane plume stretching about 4.7 miles north of Douglas in December, according to analysis by the United Nations’ International Methane Emissions Observatory.

The errant methane — a valuable commodity and potent greenhouse gas — came from the Douglas Gas Plant, a natural gas processing plant owned and operated by Tallgrass Energy. The company purposely vented the gas over the course of two days — Dec. 6-7 — because it discovered traces of oxygen in a gas pipeline, creating a potential hazard, according to documents Tallgrass submitted to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality and obtained by WyoFile.

The company played by the book in conducting the gas releases for safety purposes, according to Wyoming DEQ officials. It notified the agency soon after it began venting operations and consulted with DEQ to ensure that wind and other atmospheric conditions would sweep the gas up and away from the town of Douglas, posing no risk to the public, DEQ Public Information Supervisor Kimberly Mazza said.

The company’s actions do not appear to violate its state permits, Mazza added.

Still, a local emergency management official said his office should have been notified instead of learning about the event long after the fact. And there’s a potential discrepancy in reports of the volume of gas that was released.

In its reporting to DEQ, Tallgrass estimated it had released a total 152.80 mcf (thousand cubic feet) of methane — or a range of 2.1 to 2.6 metric tons — into the atmosphere, according to a conversion calculation by the Environmental Defense Fund. It reported an additional 1.34 metric tons of volatile organic compounds in the releases.

“I think what these [satellite] detections are showing is the important role that a program like that could play in verifying reports and taking enforcement actions if necessary to get problems like this fixed.”

Jon Goldstein, Environmental Defense Fund

However, a Jan. 31, 2023 Bloomberg News article cites analysis by the United Nations’ IMEO that estimated the release of gas “at a rate of 76 to 184 metric tons an hour” in order to create the plume observed by satellites. Tallgrass reported it had conducted five separate releases totalling about 6.5 hours of venting at various pressures. If the IMEO calculation is correct, Tallgrass could have vented approximately 845 metric tons of methane. That’s equal to the greenhouse gas emissions from 4,552 gasoline-powered vehicles driven for a year, according to a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency greenhouse gas calculator.

Due to the nature of the orbiting satellites, they could not capture the full event, the IMEO said. Still, the IMEO confirmed with WyoFile this week that it stands by its analysis.

DEQ is investigating whether there is a discrepancy, Mazza said. The agency has asked Tallgrass to double-check its calculations and will use its own air-quality-monitoring systems to determine the actual volume vented. Regarding the IMEO’s calculations, Mazza said the agency cannot verify such “third-hand information.

“We don’t have accuracy on that type of information,” she added, “so we’re looking into it.”

No warning

Converse County Emergency Manager Russ Dalgarn didn’t learn about the intentional methane venting, he said, until people began sharing the Bloomberg article with him. Neither Tallgrass or DEQ gave him a heads up, he said.

After making inquiries with Tallgrass and DEQ officials, Dalgarn was assured there was never a public safety risk, he told WyoFile. He also learned that, technically, neither Tallgrass or DEQ were obligated to notify local emergency managers.

“DEQ is not required to contact [local officials] because it wasn’t an emergency,” Mazza confirmed with WyoFile.

An observer watches as gas operators demonstrate a flare in the Jonah field in 2005. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Still, Tallgrass, “as a good neighbor,” should have given his office notice, Dalgarn said. After speaking with Tallgrass officials this week, the company has agreed to update its notification protocol to include the local emergency management office in such a case.

“I think we have a good relationship with Tallgrass other than this event,” Dalgarn said. “Somehow we got missed in the communications.”

Methane emissions

Though there were no apparent regulatory violations or fire or human health risks, the situation underscores the need for DEQ to update how it regulates methane emissions, Powder River Basin Resource Council Community Organizer Katherine Stahl said.

“First, we would like for Tallgrass to reconcile their report that they gave to the DEQ with the estimates of the scientists at the International Methane Emissions Observatory,” Stahl said. 

DEQ should also require Tallgrass, and other gas facility operators, to install vent meters to ensure accurate reporting on emission volumes, she said. Overall, there needs to be a robust monitoring and reporting system in place — particularly for facilities that are close to communities.

“We would like to see better reporting and more consistent reporting and transparency on the part of these companies,” Stahl said.

Industrial methane emissions are also a significant contributor to human-caused climate change. Over a 20-year period, methane is 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas, according to the United Nations Environment Programme.

An oil well in Campbell County flares methane. (Courtesy Powder River Basin Resource Council)

That’s one reason the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is updating its rules and regulations regarding methane emissions in the oil and gas industry.

“Oil and natural gas operations are the nation’s largest industrial source of methane, a highly potent climate pollutant that is responsible for approximately one-third of current warming resulting from human activities,” according to an EPA fact sheet. “These operations are also a leading source of other harmful air pollutants, including smog-forming volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and air toxics such as benzene.”

The EPA’s proposed updates, among other things, would establish a Super-Emitter Response Program. It would empower the public to use various detection and monitoring data to alert the EPA of potential emission hotspots. The program would also allow federal and state regulators to better utilize information such as the satellite data obtained and analyzed by the IMEO, according to Jon Goldstein, senior director of regulatory and legislative affairs at the Environmental Defense Fund.

The IMEO has used satellite imagery to detect several large industrial methane emission spots around the globe, and it’s an important tool that EPA and other regulatory bodies should use, he said.

“I think what these [satellite] detections are showing is the important role that a program like that could play in verifying reports and taking enforcement actions if necessary to get problems like this fixed,” Goldstein said.

Dustin Bleizeffer is a Report for America Corps member covering energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily...

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Here is prime example of corporate control of our precious future. This should never have happened. DEQ in Wyoming is very compassionate to the energy industry they are supposed to regulate. Venting should never be an option. And to do this in close proximity to a community is just a risk that should be never be considered. But rubber stamped it was. And no real measurements by Tall Grass is totally unacceptable. Without satellite monitoring no one would even know about this. Shameful.

  2. Tallgrass “played by the book” and did not violate their state permits in reporting their release as 2 metric tons when an objective measurement says the release was 400 times that? Then the book and the permits need to be re-written. And energy companies’ actions must be monitored, and violations punished. We need transparency from these companies and enforcement from DEQ.

    1. You’re right, DEQ needs to step up enforcement, but they won’t.

      DEQ would file notice of violations (NOV’s) against producers that violated their state issued air quality permits. These NOV’s would include hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines. Not once, in the 10 years that i was involved with permitting, did the producers have to pay up. DEQ would give them a slap on the wrist and some mean worded emails. DEQ is a joke

  3. Methane leak detection has spawned an industry. We need more people to put their well calibrated methane data online, to help police our quality of life (Like the Purple Air quality online sensors). Near real-time data will help reduce leaks, and sloppy reporting.

  4. State could also mandate the gas pumped back underground. The coal seam there would take it. Also several depleted oil zones as well. Safe cheap easy to do. Should of been done years ago. I find it very hard to believe that amount of gas was contaminated.

  5. Look, managing these products is hard & dangerous. We all use them & the state unquestionably funds it’s operations (including DEQ) from their extraction. Mishaps are going to happen. The point is: how do the operators handle & report those mishaps and how does DEQ respond and follow up?

    Those are important questions to us all but especially to those of us living in close proximity to production, processing, transport & storage.

    The problem is when reporting spills, leaks or releases is inaccurate, monitoring is absent & DEQ turns a blind eye or doesn’t have leverage to demand best practices & transparency.
    Those are problems that we as citizens can get up on our hind legs & squawk about until they are fixed!

  6. This is the saddest news I’ve read in a very long time. I’m 92 years old and cannot understand how profit can overshadow the healthful lives of our children and their children’s children in the future.

  7. Confirmation
    The best hydrocarbons are ones left in the ground.
    Methane/green house gases are destroying our global ability to manage the future.

  8. Flaring would be much less damaging to the environment than venting. Why is venting allowed?

  9. DEQ is obviously debunking any information that disagrees with Tallgrass reporting. The smell of corruption is clear in the entire nation except in Wyoming. Time for the EPA to step in.

  10. When a release of natural gas is necessary why is there not a protocol to flare rather than simply vent?