The state panel that oversees public utilities in Wyoming has filed notice that it will appeal the ruling of a federal judge who sided last month with the Equality State’s largest energy supplier in a closely watched rate hike case.

Lawyers representing the Wyoming Public Service Commission gave notice earlier this month that they would ask the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver to weigh in on the matter. A group known as Wyoming Industrial Energy Consumers, which challenged the rate hike request proposed by PacifiCorp, also filed notice that it would appeal. 

The new court documents merely inform the court that the commission and advocacy group intend to appeal. The actual legal arguments will come later, and the case will likely stretch into next year.

PacifiCorp, which operates in Wyoming under its subsidiary Rocky Mountain Power, filed the lawsuit last year after the commission reduced what had initially been a 29.2% rate hike, which was the subject of contentious public meetings due to the historic size of the proposed increase.

Transmission lines in southern Wyoming. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

The 2023 rate case ultimately resulted in a 5.5% general rate hike in January 2024, along with a pair of temporary upward fuel cost adjustments.

The lawsuit alleged that state regulators wrongly reduced the rate hike by ignoring federal requirements, costing the utility $23 million. Wyoming Industrial Energy Consumers, meanwhile, asserted the rate hike would have forced Equality State customers to subsidize out-of-state users.

Some state leaders have also suspected that PacifiCorp has attempted to shift too much of the costs of a regional power system to customers in Wyoming.

The lawsuit never made it to trial. Instead, U.S. District Judge Kelly H. Rankin granted the utility’s request to decide the case in its favor without a trial, arguing the facts in the case were not at issue.

The lawsuit named Wyoming Industrial Energy Consumers as a defendant, as well as commissioners Christopher Petrie and Michael Robinson and then-commissioner Mary Throne. Throne has since left the panel and has been replaced by Chris Boswell, who is also now listed as a defendant in the suit.

Joshua Wolfson serves as WyoFile's editor-in-chief. He lives in Casper. Contact him at josh@wyofile.com.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *