Regulations require nontoxic, i.e. non-lead, shot when hunting waterfowl, but lead pellets are still popular with sportsmen for other applications such as upland bird hunting and skeet shooting as pictured here. (Matthew Copeland/WyoFile)

It is time for all of us who hunt to move away from using outdated toxic lead bullets and transition to using high-tech nontoxic copper ammunition. I am a lifelong hunter and angler. For the last 10 years, I have exclusively used nontoxic ammunition for all of my hunting.

Lead has been known for centuries to be a broad-spectrum toxin for humans and wildlife. The Environmental Protection Agency calls lead “one of the most dangerous neurotoxins in the environment.” In general, children are at higher risk for harm because they absorb more lead than adults and their developing brains are more easily damaged by the lead. Most of the effects are subtle and not easily recognized.

Since the 1970s, lead has been banned in paint and gasoline. In 1991, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ordered a ban on the use of lead shot for hunting migratory waterfowl. An estimated 1 million ducks, geese and swans were dying each year from eating spent lead shot pellets.

A similar ban has not been implemented on big-game hunting, but there are many reasons to make the switch nonetheless. Nontoxic ammo performs better than toxic lead. Because nontoxic copper is less dense than lead, bullets of the same weight are larger, so they carve a larger wound channel. Copper is harder. It does not lose mass when it hits a target like lead does, so it penetrates farther. The ballistics and killing power of high-caliber nontoxic ammo are superior, so using it for big game helps make us better hunters.

Nontoxic ammo is generally more expensive, but the price differential is coming down. Today, premium lead bullets cost more than standard copper. What I do is practice with a cheaper lead bullet, then finish with a few rounds of copper, so my additional costs are minimal. Steel shot for upland bird hunting is now available in size #6 and #7. I find that it performs very well. I am no worse a wing shooter using steel.

California has decided to phase-in a ban on hunting with lead ammo to protect the California condor — a large and endangered scavenger. The state prohibited the use of lead for any hunting effective July 1, 2019. There is a chance the California condor could become extinct from poisoning by lead ammo. If that happened, it would be a stain on hunters’ reputations as wildlife conservationists.

Hunters contribute a great deal to wildlife conservation. We pay an excise tax on guns and ammunition that raised almost $1 billion for wildlife management last year. We pay more in license fees than any other recreational users. Unique among outdoor users, we buy a habitat conservation stamp to benefit all wildlife. Given this great record, none of us should want to contaminate our hunt by bringing home tainted meat or leaving toxic lead in the field. We now have good alternatives that allow us to prevent both.

Support civil civic discourse with a tax deductible donation today.

Only about 5% of Americans hunt, but about 95% support hunting if it is conducted ethically, safely and as humanely as possible. Using nontoxic ammunition is the right thing to do for our families who eat game, for wildlife scavengers and for the reputation of hunting and hunters.

Paul W. Hansen is a retired conservation leader and now the A section columnist for the Jackson Hole News&Guide.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Hi Paul, I hope all is well and good with you.. I am still a member and now a life member of the League. Guess what, we still struggle with membership.!

    My question is, when did you leave the League as executive director.

    Steg