If you grew up loving libraries and respecting librarians, you’re as appalled as I am that the Wyoming Legislature spent a lot of time this year and last trying to find ways to punish libraries and the people who work there. An interim committee debated whether lawmakers should impose massive civil penalties on public and school libraries if “sexually explicit” material was “accessible” in children’s sections. In 2026, House Bill 10 sprang to life with smaller potential penalties and an excruciatingly detailed definition of “sexually explicit.”

Opinion

For good measure, Wyoming Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ann Lucas of Cheyenne filed House Bill 72, which would have made library professionals criminally liable for “promoting obscenity.” Fortunately, HB 72 had only one sponsor and died a quick death. HB 10 fared better but failed to make it past the finish line. Don’t think that is the end of the story, however.  

The Aug. 18 midterms will tell Wyoming a lot about which way our Legislature will be headed next year. If the Wyoming Freedom Caucus manages to maintain control of the House and take control of the Senate, Wyoming can expect yet further attempts at oppression and repression.  

Why, you may wonder, when the public itself is overwhelmingly supportive of libraries, library workers and the freedom to read freely? When the trustees of Cheyenne’s Laramie County School District 1 took up the non-issue of “sexually explicit” library material a few years ago, it did so at the behest of a small but vocal group, the local chapter of Moms for Liberty.  After a little concerted effort, it got a majority of like-minded members elected to the school board. They promptly took up the rulemaking needed to identify existing so-called objectionable books and make it virtually impossible to acquire more.  Despite overwhelming public opposition to such book banning, the policies are in place now.

To what end? Well, it is hard to tell. It is a lot to expect an employee to risk their livelihood by pointing out that a student might benefit by being allowed to read as they like. So far, 46 of 48 items nominated have been identified as “sexually explicit” by the school district.

Among them are Allen Ginsberg’s “Collected Poems” and Toni Morrison’s classic, “The Bluest Eye.”

Cheyenne schools are not alone; book banning has become “rampant and common” across the country, according to PEN America, a group that works to protect free expression.  

One Cheyenne school district nomination that recently survived censorship concerned sound effects said to have been included in a video clip used by a classroom teacher. A prominent board officer publicly expressed her hope that the nominator might try again.

Imagine being that teacher.  Are they likely to again dare using video? Or any other illustration to make a point? What if someone, anyone, doesn’t like it? And what about those teachers who formerly kept random books in their classrooms for students to read at their leisure? I’m guessing many have long since cleared out their shelves and new teachers avoid starting the practice. Who knows how many books or other materials have thus been silently overlooked? Or how many students, who might have benefitted from exposure to new ideas, have unknowingly lost that opportunity? 

And what about library workers? I volunteer at my local library and sometimes pull books to be picked up later by patrons. A few months ago, a kid requested books with paintings by Degas, the French Impressionist famous for painting ballerinas, some in diaphanous attire. Are such paintings “sexually explicit”? Not in my opinion, but regardless, if parents are worried about what their child sees or reads, shouldn’t they be the ones discussing the matter with their child?  

Wyomingites will remember an imbroglio that occurred in Gillette in 2023, when its long-time library director declined to remove a list of “explicit” books, citing the First Amendment. Terri Lesley was fired and successfully sued both the library board and Campbell County for civil rights violations.  On Oct. 9, 2025, federal District Court Judge Alan Johnson closed the case. The defendants reportedly paid Lesley $700,000.

That’s a lot of money, but I imagine she wishes she’d never been given reason to sue at all. Ms. Lesley spoke at Laramie County Community College, where “The Librarians” was screened in January. Everyone who has ever appreciated any library should watch this disturbing documentary. It is easy to find online through PBS.

April 21 was National Library Workers Day. The Wyoming Library Association celebrated with the apt slogan, “Libraries Work Because We Do.” Visit https://wyla.org/ to learn about how library workers across Wyoming work to maintain libraries as essential community spaces.

Sadly, librarians are on the front lines in the fight against modern-day McCarthyism. President Donald Trump can’t tolerate anyone’s free speech, and lesser politicians are making everyday teachers and library professionals feel that practicing their professions is a risky business.  There’s something terribly wrong with this picture, but it’s one that can be changed for the better. A good place to start is at the ballot box. Meanwhile, thank a librarian for their service.

Marion Yoder, Cheyenne resident and avid reader, believes in the American promise of liberty and justice for all. She can be reached at mycolumn52@gmail.com.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *