A church sign in southwestern Virginia coal country. (Mason Adams)

Gov. Mark Gordon announced $250 million in budget cuts in late August, while also warning Wyomingites they were just the beginning. Despite his narrative, however, the cuts are only a little about COVID-19 or last month’s rig count.

What really created the situation is a dysfunctional state political system that allowed us to squander what should have been a 25-year head start in the race to diversify our economic strategy beyond cashing coal royalty checks. Understanding this — and saying it out loud — is critical. What is happening in Wyoming is not temporary and will not reverse itself with a vaccination or another four years of Donald Trump.

We’ve known this was coming for a very long time. When I worked for the parent company of ARCO-Coal, we bought Arch Coal with excitement, and took over the operations of the Black Thunder Coal Mine. Revisions to the Clean Air Act had fueled a shift from Appalachian coal (which my family mined for two generations) to the low-sulfur Powder River Basin coal.

But all of that was short-lived. Obama-era environmental regulations helped accelerate coal’s decline, but the primary driver has been the de-regulation of the electrical grid.

The move from rigidly structured utility monopolies to a marketplace of electricity suppliers and distributors was tailor-made for gas-fired power plants. Gas plants are nimble and can be turned on and off with a switch – critical to balancing loads in a deregulated environment and buying and selling capacity. The thermodynamics of coal plants, by contrast, mean that they take days to safely heat up or cool down.

Electric utilities made no secret about the shift. Every year they announced plans to decommission old coal plants, and were forthright in saying they had no intention of building more coal-fired plants. I saw this transition firsthand when I worked on a natural gas pipeline for a major utility. Not only was the utility transitioning away from coal, it was laying expensive and permanent infrastructure for natural gas — and was open about its intentions.

This is why, under the Trump administration, instead of bringing back King Coal in Wyoming, there has been a rash of coal producer bankruptcies. The Trump administration may have been successful at rolling back some environmental rules, but it could not change the laws of thermodynamics.

And instead of taking advantage of a 25-year advanced warning to create an economic model that acknowledges a predictable and continued decline in coal royalties, Wyoming has been mired in a political environment where political candidates tell voters whatever they think we want to hear.

Support informed Wyoming commentary — donate to WyoFile today.

Keeping their jobs is more important to politicians than being straight with Wyoming voters. As a result, we are left with underfunded schools, crumbling infrastructure, vulnerable coal communities and persistent brain drain as our kids leave the state for good jobs. 

Recognizing this deeply embedded root cause of our current quandary is critical, because in the long run, we cannot cut our way to fiscal stability. Wyoming’s state pension plan entered the year underfunded by $2 billion, a deficit likely to expand to $3 billion by year end. We have 99 dams that are rated “high hazard,” a $149 million gap in school capital expenditures and roughly 10% of our bridges that are structurally deficient and will need repair or rebuilding. 

And unless we want to be the next Flint, Michigan, we’ll need an estimated $500 million in infrastructure work over the next 10 years to maintain a safe drinking water supply.

The time for more reports and PowerPoint presentations on diversification is over. Wyoming leaders need to take immediate action to invest in creating the foundations for a post-coal economy, and at the voting booth we voters must reward those who are willing to tell us the difficult truth, and punish those who wasted these past 25 years. 

The encouraging news is that as long as we let go of our past and concentrate our efforts on the future, Wyoming has everything we need to expand our tax base and economy. In subsequent columns, I will outline what such a future might look like.

Dave Dodson

Dave Dodson lives in Wyoming and is a former CEO and professor at Stanford University. He was a Wyoming Republican candidate for U.S. Senate. Read more from his archive at davedodson.com/news.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Dave isn’t saying anything new with this column. He admits as much. Not sure why all the praise.

    “In subsequent columns, I will outline what such a future might look like.”

    Hopefully, it is not an outline (“The time for more reports and PowerPoint presentations on diversification is over.”).

    The most obvious step is to overhaul the tax system. Betting all the reasons wealthy people move here (to avoid paying taxes) will remain in place.

    Let’s see a real plan. With real numbers. That has real support. Which will affect real change.

    It will take a Harry-Potter’s magic wand.

  2. Great piece. I often reflect on economic diversification and transportation logistics possibilities in my area of the state. I-90, BNSF railroad, the joint BNSF and UP line as far North as Bishop Road, and the airport. Potential for economic diversification is everywhere in Wyoming. I am looking forward to reading Dave Dodson’s next opinion piece.L

  3. The malfeasance of our Republican run legislature is appallingly typical in Wyoming. Most of us questioned for years why our state hasn’t recognized the end of King Coal and moved to revamp our tax base. Every year we think things will change but they don’t.

  4. IMHO many of our legislators adhere to a personal ideology that has little to do with the reality of their legislative responsibilities. Voters in many of our districts simply rubberstamp the incumbent who has been a do nothing or a blocker of progress. Things will get much worse before the Wyoming legislature does anything meaningful in this direction. Your columns are essential reading. Keep up the good work!

  5. Great piece. Now if only the politicians would get on doing something about these problems, but that’s probably too much to hope. People need to vote out those who aren’t working for our best interest.

  6. I always find it interesting that in these discussions about the demise of coal it never gets mentioned that burning coal has been a major source of climate change and the overheating of the world . Which comes with the destruction of just about everything humans hold dear. That’s why the Obama administration put the clamps on coal, not to torture Wyomingites ..