Football fans pass through the student entrance of War Memorial Stadium for University of Wyoming’s first home game of the season Oct. 30, 2020. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

The University of Wyoming athletic department has requested an additional $6 million for its budget over the next two years. The primary driver of the request is the recent NCAA settlement that allows universities to pay college athletes for use of their names, images and likenesses

Supporters of the increase have framed it as necessary for UW to continue to compete in college athletics. The Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Appropriations Committee was unconvinced and recently omitted the requested funds from UW’s proposed budget. However, the issue will almost certainly be debated again when the Legislature convenes next month in Cheyenne.

The Legislature should stand firm. The statehouse doesn’t need to spend more on UW athletics.

First, consider UW’s budget in relation to comparable schools. While UW will remain in the Mountain West Conference for the 2026-2027 academic year, former conference members Colorado State, Boise State, Utah State, Fresno State and San Diego State will join a newly configured Pac-12 Conference. UW Athletics Director Tom Burman indicated that UW was in the lower third of athletic department budgets of schools in the Rocky Mountain region, and that without the appropriation UW would have to move down to “compete with Chadron State College.” A review of the budgets of all programs involved in the remaining MWC, courtesy of the Knight-Newhouse College Athletic Database, suggests otherwise.

Perusing the data, it quickly becomes apparent that Wyoming’s current budget is about average for the 2026 membership. This does not include the over $100 million that UW spent on upgrading War Memorial Stadium and a new swimming pool. Here is a list of budgets for other Division I schools in the region and former Mountain West Conference members.  

Clearly, UW’s existing budget of $54.83 million is in line with remaining members of the Mountain West Conference and significantly higher than regional Division I schools in the Big Sky Conference (though that conference is a lower division in football, which is the primary driver of any college athletics budget). 

The NCAA settlement is specifically designed to address schools in the “Power 4” conferences, of which Wyoming is not a member.  

Of all of the schools above, it’s important to note that while all remaining members of the Mountain West Conference “opted in” to the NCAA settlement, new member UC Davis did not. Additionally, six schools in the Big Sky Conference did not opt into the settlement. Included in the list of schools that opted out was Eastern Washington, where former UW associate athletic director Tim Collins is now the athletic director. At the Big Sky media days, Mr. Collins indicated, it was in the school’s best interest to press “pause and see how things unfold before we jump in, legally and financially.” Big Sky Commissioner Tom Wistrcill described the new system as “building the plane as we fly it,” reinforcing the desire to wait for clarity.  

All of this occurs amid changes to the Mountain West Conference. In late 2024, MWC members Boise State, Utah State, San Diego State, Colorado State and Fresno State announced that they would be leaving the MWC effective June 1, 2025.  

To facilitate the newly constituted Mountain West Conference and avoid Air Force and UNLV departing for either the new Pac-12 or American Athletic Conference, UW and the other remaining MWC members had to agree to allow Air Force and UNLV a higher percentage of the penalty funds the departing member will pay (24.5% for UNLV and Air Force vs. 11.5% for the remaining members). This amounts to $25 million for UNLV and Air Force while Wyoming will receive $9.43 million. This is likely only going to make the discrepancy, and ultimately the competitive balance, in the new MWC more skewed toward UNLV and Air Force. 

The Mountain West Conference began operations in 1999. In MWC games only, the UW football program has a combined conference record of 77-128 (37.5% winning percentage), while men’s basketball has a record of 171-251, for a winning percentage of 40.5%.  

A journalist for Nevada Sports Net, Chris Murray, recently compiled a list of the Mountain West programs that were producing the most “value.”   UW ranked dead last.

Over the past 25 years, since joining the Mountain West Conference, Wyoming has reportedly agreed to the following buyouts with former coaches:

  • Heath Schroyer – $480,000
  • Alan Edwards – $220,000
  • Steve McClain –  $570,000
  • Joe Glenn – $316,000
  • Dave Christiansen – $570,000

By allocating more money to UW for athletics, the Legislature is only  enabling these types of ill-considered contracts and subsequent buyouts in the future. UW football’s current head coach, Jay Sawvel, has a record of 7-17 in his first two years, and UW appears headed toward another one of these buyouts.

While UW is requesting additional funds to support their NIL program, the trajectory, trend and inability of flagship programs to maintain competitiveness indicates that supporting the NIL program with this allocation from the state is likely too little too late. Without membership in the newly constituted Pac-12, along with the financial imbalance negotiated for the remaining Mountain West Conference members, UW is only throwing more money at the white elephant of college athletics. I urge the Legislature to consider whether the additional investment is appropriate and whether it will produce a positive return on investment for Wyoming’s taxpayers.       

Travis Bridger Samulski is a 1988 Pinedale High School graduate and a 1996 graduate of the University of Wyoming College of Law. He is a college football and college basketball fan and has followed University...

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

      1. You even cite that the request is “driven by the House v. NCAA settlement (approved June 6, 2025): New legal and compliance obligations for NCAA Distribution.”. It is still $6 million to support the same programs. No matter how they try to structure it.

    1. It is just a shell game UW is playing you indicate: “Any compensation or NIL programs will be funded through ticket sales, media contracts, sponsorships, concessions, and private donations, not taxpayers.” So now they are just asking the state to replace that money with state funds.

    2. Also, every article that has led up to this point UW is indicating the fans and state need to adjust to the “NIL world” https://cowboystatedaily.com/2025/12/20/pay-to-play-university-of-wyomings-battle-to-remain-division-i-in-an-nil-world/ and https://cowboystatedaily.com/2025/12/17/ortiz-and-lubnau-name-image-and-likeness-standing-still-is-moving-backward/. It’s really sort of underhanded to try and frame it any other way at this point.

  1. Join FCS/Big Sky Conference in football and basketball. Problem solved.
    Without the Mountain West check the UW budget would be in line with neighboring Big Sky members having similar state populations and school enrollments. Big Sky membership would provide local rivalries, less travel expense along with a chance to be competitive and keep a good coach. Anyone who watched the FCS playoffs can see that those schools care about their teams as much as the schools in the CFP. With the state of NIL now, the next Josh Allen isn’t showing up in Laramie so continuously firing then buying out coaches isn’t going to help. Why keep trying to compete in a league that is so stacked against you?

  2. College athletics are an unrelated for-profit side business of an institution that really should be focused on education. It may not make much money if you only count ticket sales and TV rights… BUT it generates donations from alumni and others that don’t appear on the balance sheet. The University’s own Economics Department should be asked to research how much, so we can determine to what extent it is worth supporting for that reason. We don’t want to overfund it or let it take priority over the university’s educational mission, but it may be financially disadvantageous to cut funding too much.

  3. I do not want the states money used to pay student athletes. The university is for education, and I’m all for supporting that role.