There’s nothing like knocking off a few bruised and battered “Republican in name only” incumbents in a Wyoming primary election to make self-proclaimed “real conservatives” whoop and holler

Four-term moderate Sen. Michael Von Flatern (R-Gillette) had the biggest target on his back, with several groups and well-heeled conservative donors out to end his political career. They helped Troy McKeown trounce Von Flatern by more than 1,000 votes last Tuesday.

He wasn’t the only high-profile GOP legislator to fall out of favor with voters. House Majority Whip Tyler Lindholm (R-Sundance) won his 2016 general election race with 90% of the vote and was unopposed two years later.

Lindholm ran into a buzz-saw in this year’s primary, though, losing to Chip Neiman by 219 votes. It was a shocker, given his rapid rise in the Republican ranks. Neiman successfully campaigned as “the true conservative” in the race, pledging to protect the Second Amendment and vote against all tax hikes. 

It was the common theme of extreme-right candidates who also managed to oust a trio of House Republican lawmakers: Reps. Bill Pownall of Gillette, Dan Kirkbride of Chugwater and Thomas Crank of Diamondville.

In many races, things got nasty. Von Flatern was the victim of a brutal assault by the Wyoming Gun Owners, whose manager, Aaron Dorr, posted a video declaring him “the worst back-stabbing, lying-to-your-face piece of trash” in the Senate. 

Wyoming is only a part-time gig for Dorr, who runs a network of similar gun rights groups with his two brothers in other states. 

Despite that, WYGO is laughing in the face of the Frontier Republicans, a group of traditional conservatives and moderates who called for a civil discourse of ideas in the wake of the far right’s takeover of the Wyoming Republican Party’s top offices. 

Von Flatern has never opposed safe gun ownership, he told the Gillette News Record, adding that  WYGO was trying to raise money by attacking him.

Both U.S. Sen. Mike Enzi and Wyoming Senate Vice President Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower) rushed to Von Flatern’s defense against WYGO’s claims. “They don’t go after most of the people on raw facts,” Driskill told the newspaper. “They use slander and innuendo to try to impinge their character.”

Despite that, Von Flatern was defeated. Following the election, Dorr put down his weapons long enough to declare on WYGO’s website that the group “obliterated gun grabbers” and will “terrify anti-gun Republicans in Cheyenne for years to come!”

But WYGO was hardly the only group to have Von Flatern and others on its hit list. WyoRINO — a group that claims to unmask “Republicans in name only” — rated legislators based on their votes on 10 issues during the 2020 budget session. Its assessment deemed only 18 of the 77 Republican lawmakers as upholding the party’s conservative values.

Von Flatern received a “0” score from the group, as did Crank. Kirkbride earned a 20, and Pownall doubled that. Lindholm voted with the group on half the issues it claimed truly mattered.

Evidence Based Wyoming, a blog written by former Campbell County Republican Chairman Doug Gerard, rates each legislator based on his or her entire voting record each year. Along with all 12 Democrats, he ranked Von Flatern, Crank and 10 other Republicans “very liberal.”

As a progressive Wyoming voter, I consider that absolutely absurd. There isn’t a single Republican who now serves in the Legislature who merits that rating. Heck, I wouldn’t put all the Democrats in that extreme-left category, either.

“This election has been a reasonably brutal one,” Gerard wrote. “There is a battle being waged openly for the first time in my memory for the Republican Party’s soul.”

The battle appears to have ended in a split decision. Casper Star-Tribune political reporter Nick Reynolds, who has faithfully tracked the rise of the far right in the GOP and Legislature, analyzed the 2020 results. He found that 10 of 22 candidates funded by Wyoming Liberty Group founder Susan Gore won their races. The Brophy family, another powerhouse in Wyoming’s ultra-conservative circles, triumphed in more than half of the 27 races they invested in.

I’d ask the people behind the website to explain how the hundreds of votes lawmakers cast during the year are cherry-picked for the ratings system, but there’s no one to ask. The group is anonymous. 

Crank was the site’s “RINO of the Month” for August, while Von Flatern and Pownall received that dishonor in May and June, respectively.

But not all of its recent targets lost their competitive primary contests. Sen. Fred Baldwin (R-Kemmerer) defeated Lyle Williams and Rex Rammell, while Rep. Jerry Paxton (R-Encampment) easily won a four-way race.

The incumbent that WyoRINO reserved most of its vitriol for, Rep. Pat Sweeney of Casper, nearly doubled the vote total of his far-right opponent, Burton Schoenwolf. Sweeney, bless his moderate heart, provoked the ire of the right by voting for Medicaid expansion and against so-called pro-life bills.

Rep. Sandy Newsome (R-Cody), apparently a villainess in the eyes of ultra-conservatives, saw opponent Nina Webber put up billboards that depicted a rhinoceros on the left side (naturally). On the right was Webber, wearing a red, white and blue outfit and brandishing a rifle. The sign declared she was “going western on Wyo RINOs.”

Webber will have to put the billboards and weapons in mothballs until the next election, because Newsome easily beat her and House District 24 third-place finisher Scott Court —who had previously held the seat and was aiming to retake it.

Support informed commentary with a tax-deductible donation.

Sen. Anthony Bouchard of Cheyenne, former WYGO executive director, was the election’s biggest mudslinger, hands down. In a mailer sent out about a week before voters went to the polls, Bouchard claimed that his opponent, Erin Johnson, had been fired from Gov. Mark Gordon’s staff “because of her incompetence and unethical behavior.”

In a statement, Gordon quickly rebuked Bouchard for his baseless claims, calling Johnson a valued member of his team while she served in his office. “I hope voters will make their decisions based on issues, not careless insinuation,” the governor wrote. 

Johnson told the Star-Tribune that Bouchard has “resorted to flat-out lies in a desperate attempt to defame me.” She said his slanderous and unethical behavior should disqualify him from representing Senate District 6.

It should, but so far it hasn’t. It’s impossible to know how many votes the smear may have cost Johnson, but she lost by 161. Bouchard faces Democrat Brittney Wallesch in the general election.

In addition to inter-party squabbles for the Republican Party’s soul, one of the main reasons for the ascension of the extreme right in the Legislature is that few Democrats even want to get involved in red-state politics. No Democrat filed for 10 of the 15 Senate seats up for grabs, or in 41 of the 60 House districts.

That leaves it up to moderate Republicans like Barry Crago to fill the void and offer some resistance to the extreme faction of his party. The Johnson County deputy attorney handily defeated incumbent Rep. Richard Tass of Buffalo, possessor of a “real Republican” crown bestowed by

Tass pledged to keep saying “no” to all tax increases, but Crago refused to take such a vow in an interview with Big Horn Mountain Radio. 

“I’m not going to say I’m never going to raise taxes,” said Crago, who is unopposed in the general election. “Because I don’t think that’s a logical way to approach the problem. If I go to Cheyenne with preconceived ideas and I’m not willing to [look at] solutions or suggest my own, then I probably shouldn’t go.”

Wow! His brave, common-sense declaration ensures he will be instantly denounced as a RINO by GOP ranters and raters, but as a passenger on the good ship “Very Liberal,” may I heartily say to Rep.-elect Crago, “Welcome aboard, sir.”

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Mr. Lovejoy
    I believe you are technically correct. However, you are using semantics to detract from my main issue, which is the form and tone of the government under which we all must live. I believe the mainstream majority (which may lean to the left or, as in Wyoming, to the right) are at risk of losing or voting away a more moderate crop of politicians to a radicalized bunch who have an agenda which is not in the best interests of most of us.
    Let me cite one example: the police. We have all heard of a movement to “defund” the police being pushed in some places by what I would consider radicalized left groups. Now, as I get it, the intent there has various interpretations, but the end result will not actually take away money (as suggested by the term “defund”) but will reallocate money to some different form of law enforcement as was done in one New Jersey City a few years ago. In Wyoming, those I am referring to as radical right groups want to resist all new forms of tax while we are in a budget crisis. (There was an article in the Wyoming Tribune Eagle 8/26 about this very issue.) So, what happens then? All budgets will eventually suffer cuts, including public safety. That, sir, becomes a literal defunding of the police. That is not acceptable to me, nor to most of us lowly moderates. I suppose for the wealthy, it is not a major issue; they can just buy their own security and fence themselves in. The rest of us (armed or not) do not particularly look forward to a life of anarchy which would fill the vacuum in the absence of an active police force and which we are currently witnessing in some locales.
    When budgets get cut, it is not only public safety, but public health, education, infrastructure, etc. we stand to lose. Whether those items are cut or changed by the radical left or the radical right is of little consequence; the majority are going to suffer. This is what I want the moderate side of our republican party ( RINO to you? ) to fight now, while there is still time. And this is what I want the average voter to learn now, instead of being sucked in by sound bites and lies. So, I end where I started: “Wyoming moderate Republicans need to step up and get out in front in the current power struggle.”

  2. Mr. Harris.
    The founding fathers chose to have a “Constitutional Republic” not a “Democracy”. There is a significant difference.

  3. Wyoming moderate Republicans need to step up and get out in front in the current power struggle. So far, it seems as though the moderates are facing this threat with a shrug. For instance, I am a news junkie and consider myself somewhat well informed; that said, I am familiar with the WyoRINO and WYGO movements, but only heard of the Frontier Republicans in this article.
    While many will call me an alarmist, I see happenings in Wyoming as a microcosm of what is happening on a national scale with Trump followers. That is, there is a strong movement powered by the wealthy to move this country toward a plutocracy. That movement is generating enough noise to lure voters who make their decisions based primarily on sound bites and half-truths. However, what will likely be the ultimate outcome is the movement will continue into oligarchy. If that comes to pass, I believe we will come to the end of the democracy this country was founded on. While we have not always fully lived up to the principles we profess a belief in, they have been there to guide us. Those principles will disappear under an oligarchy. Our children and grandchildren are the ones who will suffer the consequences of that end.
    What needs to happen is the moderates need to step up with as loud and boisterous a voice as that used by the far right (although hopefully not the lies.) Voters need to listen to reason, not simple sound bites. (This last will be the toughest nut to crack.) For crying out loud, do not rely on a single source for your news—look for information that counters your initial beliefs and look at it with an open mind (but do not believe everything you hear from any source.) Then try to determine the motivation behind what is being said—self-promotion or a desire for overall good.
    We should not forget that it was President Eisenhower (R) who, in his farewell address, said:
    “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”
    And it was President Kennedy (D), in his inaugural address, who said “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”
    While we are at it, let us not forget Matthew 7:15-20, warning of false prophets.

  4. I have been a democrat all my life. I would be easy just to sit back and laugh at the fighting going on in the Republican party. But, it is not funny. It is absolutely horrifying to watch filthy rich people come into our state to live so they don’t have to pay state income taxes and donate to these wingnuts to protect their obscene wealth.
    Gun ownership has been a given in both the Democratic and Republican platforms. It would be laughable that it gains these idiots votes. But, it has.
    Wyoming Republicans are going to have to get off their pathetic derrieres and firmly take back their party.