The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, which oversees protections of land, water, air, and solid wastes, recently upgraded to an online public comment system. (courtesy Wyoming DEQ)

— by Charles and Marilyn Ham

Marilyn and Charles Ham

In the last few years, 75 percent of applications to drill new oil and gas wells in Wyoming have come from just three counties: Laramie, Converse and Campbell. Those counties have more than 5,500 permitted oil and gas wells. Despite this fact, when it comes to oil and gas drilling, these counties have the most lax air quality requirements in Wyoming. This is unacceptable and needs fixing.

Natural gas has been touted as the clean alternative for power generation. This claim has some truth, insofar as burning natural gas results in fewer toxic emissions like sulfur dioxide and mercury. But, unless it is done right, oil and gas drilling and natural gas production can lead to significant emissions of volatile organic compounds that can affect human health — both directly, through exposure, and indirectly, through their contribution to ground-level ozone formation. This is what happened in Sublette County when a rapid drilling boom led to ozone levels worse than Los Angeles on some days. We must avoid this problem in other areas of Wyoming.

Natural gas also consists mostly of methane, some of which leaks into the atmosphere during all phases of oil and gas production: transmission, storage and processing. Because methane is more than 25 times as potent at trapping solar radiation than carbon dioxide, scientists estimate that leaks from oil and gas production make up about 25 percent of the warming we are experiencing today from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.

Recently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a new rule to do something about this. EPA refers to the new rule as “a suite of common-sense requirements that will help combat climate change, reduce air pollution that harms public health, and provide greater certainty about Clean Air Act permitting requirements for the oil and gas industry.” As a co-benefit of measuring and reducing methane leaks, the rule will also reduce smog and cancer-causing pollutants.

A key provision of the proposed rule requires the control of flow-back fluids from oil and gas wells where fracking is employed. Termed “green completions,” this would put a stop to the venting of natural gas and hydrocarbon vapors during well completion, instead routing these pollutants to a combustion device.

Another provision would require compressors, pumps and valve actuators that operate on produced gas to reduce the amount of gas leaked to the atmosphere. EPA would also reduce the minimum size for storage tanks whose emissions must be controlled while requiring regular inspections to detect and repair leaks.

While EPA’s proposed rule is a step in the right direction, some elements of the rule are still less restrictive than regulations currently applied in parts of western Wyoming. In Sublette County, for example, operators are already required to inspect facilities for leaks on a quarterly basis, not once every six months as EPA has proposed. These requirements vastly improve air quality.

Technologies for complying with Wyoming’s requirements have proven effective and economical. Oil and gas producers in Wyoming continue to rank among the most productive and profitable in the country. They have achieved this even at record low commodity prices. There is no valid reason to exempt producers nationwide or in other parts of Wyoming from standards that have proven effective in Sublette County.  

Sensible requirements like quarterly leak inspections are working in Sublette County where the most recent air quality data shows a dramatic improvement. It is time for EPA to extend these protections nationwide and for Wyoming to extend these protections across the state.

— Charles and Marilyn Ham live in Cheyenne, Wyoming.

— Columns are the signed perspective of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of WyoFile’s staff, board of directors or its supporters. WyoFile welcomes guest columns and op-ed pieces from all points of view. If you’d like to write a guest column for WyoFile, please contact WyoFile editor-in-chief Dustin Bleizeffer at dustin@wyofile.com.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. It’s not helping anywhere in this state. I cannot see the mtns for the haze most days. And there is No Snow out. I believe we have a combination of polluting events and Stopping oil and coal altogether is only way to stop it. I am in Sweetwater county and drive to Mableton and Pinedale (up 191 and across 351 then up 189 and back down 191 to RS) five days a week every week of the year and our skies have been getting thicker and thicker each year while Gov.Mead and his cronies are fighting air, water, and land pollution control. What good are jobs when you can’t breathe or end up with cancer and die? Come to your senses Wyoming! Keep IT in the ground! We need wind and solar. And not the giant farms but small community ran fields. Imho anyway. I’m pretty sure I am not only one who thinks this way. I may be the only one not afraid to speak out and show my illegally(?) gained pictures to the world.

    Nadine Girouard