I was recently reminded of a wonderful analogy used by Friedrich von Hayek upon accepting his Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, on Dec. 11, 1974.  

Opinion

By way of addressing the limits all men face in improving the social order, he contrasted the work of a carpenter with that of a gardener.  A carpenter “shapes his handiwork,” whereas a gardener, “cultivate(s) a growth by providing the appropriate environment.” 

In other words, one forces an outcome while the other nurtures the natural order, interfering only with supportive acts like weeding, watering and keeping pests out.  

Hayek had a warning for those tempted to force: “There is danger in the exuberant feeling of ever growing power which the advance of the physical sciences has engendered and which tempts man to try, “dizzy with success”, to use a characteristic phrase of early communism, to subject not only our natural but also our human environment to the control of a human will. The recognition of the insuperable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to teach the student of society a lesson of humility which should guard him against becoming an accomplice in men’s fatal striving to control society – a striving which makes him not only a tyrant over his fellows, but which may well make him the destroyer of a civilization which no brain has designed but which has grown from the free efforts of millions of individuals.”

It is very tempting to force outcomes, and in politics, that temptation is growing evermore dangerous.  

The Wyoming GOP recently held their state convention here in Cheyenne, and I can’t say that I made it. Having attended our local Laramie County GOP convention with Mr. Edmonds the previous month, I’d had my fill. More about that in a bit.

Attending these things is always an eye opener, but the main takeaway for those of us who have been active in party politics for many years is the degree to which animosity and pettiness, most of it self inflicted, have come to characterize such functions. But while the pettiness is sad, it’s the party leadership’s deep desire to control that is troubling.  

Control in how we organize our political parties can lead to control that finds the bedrock principles of a free nation terribly inconvenient, and too easily discarded.

Take for instance the Wyoming GOP’s latest bylaw change enabling the expulsion of elected precinct members. In this their apparent dislike or distrust of voters is becoming more and more public. The latest move at the state convention gives county chairman the ability to toss out any duly elected precinct member for failing to attend a certain number of monthly meetings without an excuse.   

Lincoln County GOP Chairman Lance Oviatt went on record to say he would not enforce such a rule as he did not feel the party had the authority to remove someone who had been elected by the people.  

The Wyoming Republican Party State Convention took place from April 18-20 in Cheyenne. (Maya Shimizu Harris/WyoFile)

He is exactly right, and good for him for saying it. We must all stand by these important principles or we will all fall from the lack of them.

Precinct members are the only persons within the Republican Party organization to have their names placed on ballots and go before the voters of the state. Everyone else — including the ever-controlling state party leadership — is either elected by the internal vote of those precinct members, or, as we see the Wyoming GOP doing more and more, they are appointed. 

Sadly, this is becoming more and more the order of the day, voters are out, party rulers are in, force and control. Voters, it would seem, are too unpredictable for this new cadre of political innovators. Best to decide these things in secret or after diminishing any legitimate attempts at debate.

Which leads me to my next point, a continual obsession with controlling who is and is not a “Republican.” Most of the present leadership appear to believe all of their problems will go away if they can rid the state of any voter not exactly like, well, them. And while they have no control over who registers to vote as a Republican to vote in elections, they can and do try to force their way into the process by actively kicking members out of the internal party apparatus. And by extension, continually “censuring” or “unrecognizing” elected officials who don’t tow their line. 

This habit of kicking people out is somewhat of an obsession with them, which is reflected in the contemptuous nature some of their members treat fellow Republicans they don’t deem as their kind of “Republican.” 

Wyoming Republican Party Chairman Frank Eathorne speaks during the state GOP convention on May 7, 2022 in Sheridan. Eathorne has served as the party’s leader since 2017. During that time, the Wyoming GOP has enjoyed dominance in government, but has experienced multiple inter-party clashes. (Lauren Miller/Casper Star-Tribune)

At the Laramie County GOP Convention, Mr. Edmonds and myself watched a woman scream “RINO” across the room, breaking decorum in a very ugly manner. She was not reprimanded from the podium — not at all. Business just continued as if this kind of indecent behavior is the new norm, because it is.

It’s a logical progression then that the current Wyoming GOP spends little to no time talking about recruiting new Republicans into the fold. This would be too much like letting things grow, I fear. They might give this idea lip service once in a while, but we all know their hearts aren’t in it. Why would it be when their main focus is establishing and maintaining absolute control? New people inevitably bring new ideas, beliefs and perspectives — also known as new hurdles to forcing control over every outcome.

The old saying goes if you aren’t growing, you’re dying. Party leaders should think about that. 

The reality is, the Wyoming GOP can froth and foment, plot and plan to force and control everything within the party apparatus all they want, but none of that will have any real effect on how and who voters select in the end.  

But we the people should take note. We need more gardeners and less craftsmen, as Hayek puts it so well. 

As much as the present (and temporary) masters of the Wyoming GOP would like to manipulate their way into tight and lasting careers through political control and consolidation, their reach will most likely exceed their grasp.

Amy Edmonds is a former state legislator from Cheyenne. She can be reached at amyinwyoming@icloud.com.

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Amy: Well Said.

    I too was at the meeting when the woman yelled, “Rino”. I expected Taft to say something but he didn’t.

    I am pleased to see new names entering the primaries. I am hopeful that we can get to the point where we discuss our differences rather than suffer the short-sighted comments and actions of the folks on the right edge.

  2. Conservatives have always been about control of others. It’s a result of their being basically insecure…combined with their inflated images of themselves.

  3. I started attending Laramie County GOP meetings in 2010. The meeting of November 2010 following the general election was jubilant until I mentioned that the Vice Chair had funded the Democrat. Jeff Smith had donated to the Mike Massey campaign for superintendent of public instruction. I was roundly criticized for noting that leadership ought to set an example and stay out of races if they did not want the Republican nominee.

    For the next 12 years, you would see the control of the LC GOP and those that attended the meetings were completely different. The ones who attended were the “far right”. The ones that were quintessential republicans. The leadership was really there to advance themselves into state politics. They often ended up on the “moderate” end of the WYRINO scale or other such measures in the voting of the legislature, right along with the voting of the democrats. And there were empty seats… lots of empty seats. Pretty much once every two years I would see Amy Edmonds. Every so often, there would be a controversy. And that is when the seats would be far warmer. and the seats were warmed by folks carrying proxies. Lots of proxies.

    Those “proxy” elections included fighting to not pay the county party shares to the state party and a whole myriad of other issues that made one wonder if we were a republican party at all.

    Imagine how would you feel if your Superintendent of Public Instruction or Governor would simply never come to work? If there was always an empty seat at their desk. Then I would remember all those empty chairs when Jared and Dani Olsen held the chairman position.

    Not to worry, I also studied the democrat precinct level politics. In most elections, the democrat party precinct seat elections produced… 3… yes, THREE precinct people. Enough to fill a booth at Espies with Press attending.

    I hear some of that has changed since Taft Love has become LCGOP chairman.

    A note about “far right” and “moderate”. Those are terms used by the press. I was speaking with a wonderful lady in the Capitol and she remarked that the visitors who come from counties that are not Laramie county seem to be much more like the Freedom Caucus then the Wyoming Caucus… “far right” and “moderate” for those of you in the press.

    I have been out of the LCGOP precinct meetings and I do not miss looking at empty chairs. Amy never saw the empty chairs. But if the threat of losing power if you fail to attend, fills the chairs has Amy attending a regular meeting, then I am OK with it. And if the two sides of the GOP started to talk instead of yell at each other… maybe the “far right” and the “moderate” divide would shrink.

    I wish the Press would change the language. I have yet to hear any reporter talk about the “violent left” at UCLA. I am clearly the “radical right”, “alt right”, “far right” guy that owns guns and hopes for the day when abortion is rare like Bill Clinton said it should be. And I have funded a Democrat campaign against a “moderate”, and I think she was to the “right” of him.

    There are two sides to the story, and Amy you are telling just one side.

    The party system in Wyoming, both Republican and Democrat are both broken. The attempt to get butts in seats is made of good intentions. Which is usually fine with the “moderates” unless someone is watching their votes.

    1. Kevin,
      You are spot on and telling the truth. Even in Park County, a Republican Senator, considered a leader amoungst the Senate and the County Republican Party did the same thing. Donated to his buddy Mike Massie, the democrat running against the Republican in the SOPI general election. And then repeated the same act locally when he supported and donated to a democrat County Clerk running against the Republican challenger.

      Putting the (R) after your name, but not supporting the platform became the norm.

  4. This fixation from the so-called GOP – the focus on control and power – is frightening. Sickening, actually. I for one have hoped that ignoring it would serve to oppose it – and I hope the coming election will prove that sensible minds are still “out here” and we can begin work to restore decorum, common sense, civility and logic.

    1. I’m with you. I know how many good thoughtful republicans are out there

  5. Actually ignoring someone intent on making an horses rear of themselves may actually be a good thing.