If Wyoming Republicans actually wanted to show that their party’s conservative agenda works, the first thing they would do in the upcoming legislative session is raise the state’s minimum wage.

Please don’t laugh. I know that sounds far-fetched, given the GOP’s history of doggedly fighting against minimum wage hikes, both here and nationally. Republicans have found it’s much more politically expedient to spout the same tired rhetoric that for years has dominated every legislative discussion of the issue, which is to loudly proclaim it’s a job killer.

After devoting all of 10 minutes to the issue early during last year’s budget session, Republicans voted 51-9 to kill a bill sponsored by Rep. James Byrd (D-Cheyenne) to raise the state’s minimum wage from a paltry $5.15 to at least $9 an hour. The lopsided margin halted all talk about the minimum wage in the Capitol; at the same time it was quickly climbing near the top of the Democrats’ national priorities — which only made conservatives hate the idea even more.

But if you take the time to think about the impact such an action would have on our economy, state government budgets and the societal changes it would likely cause, a minimum wage hike could help the GOP accomplish many of its stated goals.

First, let’s get rid of the negatives that have led Republicans to shoot down minimum wage proposals. While the job-killer label has been so successful a claim that most people don’t even question that it’s true, it hasn’t been the experience of an increasing number of cities and states that now have a higher minimum wage.

Republicans maintain such a hike would unquestionably be a scourge to small businesses, because higher payroll will automatically force them to either fire current workers and/or throw away any future plans to expand.

But if all it did was reduce the number of jobs and stifle growth, why would 29 states have enacted laws in the past year to increase the minimum wage? In the 20 states where the laws became effective on Jan. 1, an estimated 3 million workers received a raise to help lift them out of poverty.

Four states — Alaska, Arkansas, Nebraska and South Dakota — passed voter initiatives to raise the minimum wage in their states. Illinois used the ballot process to recommend its state lawmakers take the same action.

Five states don’t have any minimum wage on the books. However, of the 45 that do, only Wyoming and Georgia have a minimum that’s less than the federal one at $7.25 per hour. While other states have been raising their minimum wages, both Wyoming and Georgia have kept theirs of $5.15 an hour.

Because the highest federal or state rate takes precedence, Wyoming opponents of an increase argue that virtually all workers in the state already get $7.25 an hour. However, that’s not true. A worker in any occupation that is not covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act is subject to the state minimum, not the federal. An employee at a business that makes less than $500,000 annually and does not engage in interstate commerce is not covered by the federal minimum wage.

There are also exceptions to the law. There are no minimums for such categories as agricultural workers, domestic servants or employees of educational, charitable, religious or nonprofit organizations.

Employees who are tipped more than $30 a month are also subject to a minimum wage in Wyoming of only $2.13 an hour. If such workers do not make enough in tips to meet at least the state or federal minimum wage for other workers in their category, employers are required by law to make up the difference.

But many tipped employees are either not aware of the provision or do not want to risk their jobs, so they don’t file such claims. When jobs are scarce, workers realize others are lined up and willing to work for below the minimum wage.

If few workers are subject to the $5.15 minimum, why are so many industries — especially motels and restaurants — so active in lobbying against a state raise up to the federal minimum?

Opponents of Rep. Byrd’s bill and similar proposals over the years have argued increasing the minimum wage will keep business owners from hiring young and inexperienced workers they don’t believe are worth a higher hourly rate. They try to make it sound like the only people who receive the minimum wage are high school students who need summer jobs.

Again, that’s simply not true. More than half of all minimum wage earners are over the age of 25, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. More than 30 percent of those workers are over the age of 34, and 20 percent are over the age of 44. These are people who, if they are lucky enough to get full-time work, earn about $14,500 a year, which puts them below the federal poverty level and often living in their parents’ basement or in a car, with no hope of having a home of their own. And if they are trying to raise a family, the gap between the poverty line and how much they make just grows bigger as the family expands.

Here’s where the conservative Republican approach to governing and their belief in taking responsibility for one’s lot in life can align with the value of raising the minimum wage.

In evaluating President Barack Obama’s proposal to raise the hourly federal minimum wage to $10.10, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said by the second half of 2016, about 16.5 million people would have higher incomes, while 500,000 would be jobless.

But that half-million who are unemployed would not necessarily stay out of work. Chad Stone, chief economist for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, wrote a column for U.S. News & World Report in February that noted an increase in the minimum wage means a larger number of low-wage workers “would experience income losses from slightly longer unemployment spells — and that those losses would be more than offset by earning a higher wage while working.”

Stone predicted an increase to at least $10 an hour would add $60 billion to the U.S. economy over the next two years. Far from being a job killer, the move would be a real economic boost for our country that would result in many current low-wage earners able to afford more products that companies make. Job growth would be a natural result in many economic sectors.

Republicans like to remind us that small businesses remain the backbone of this country. They should realize, then, that the increased purchasing power of low-wage workers will help stimulate the economy and benefit the kind of small businesses that were hit hardest by the major recession that began in 2008. Meanwhile, is there anybody who seriously believes a huge company like Wal-mart can’t afford to increase its minimum pay to at least $10 an hour?

Here’s another key reason why Wyoming lawmakers who continually stress the value of work in society should support a healthy minimum wage hike. If more families could actually sustain themselves on what they make and need less government assistance for housing, food, health care and other expenses, it would significantly reduce state budgets. It should also reduce the cries from conservatives who complain the needy are gobbling up all of the taxpayers’ money.

Finally, Republicans like to tout themselves as the party of family values, whatever that means. They bemoan the fact we aren’t living like Ozzie and Harriet did in the 1950s, when dad went to work while mother stayed at home watching the kids. If more families were not dependent on both spouses going to work at two or three part-time, low-paying jobs just to survive, more American families might be able to spend quality time with their children.

In reality, a higher minimum wage is actually a job creator instead of a job killer, and having more money active in the economy helps small businesses stay afloat. Less money spent on government assistance programs means healthier state budgets, and could also result in more parents spending time with their families.

Sounds like a conservative’s dream, doesn’t it?

— Columns are the signed perspective of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of WyoFile’s staff, board of directors or its supporters. WyoFile welcomes guest columns and op-ed pieces from all points of view. If you’d like to write a guest column for WyoFile, please contact WyoFile editor-in-chief Dustin Bleizeffer at dustin@wyofile.com.

Kerry Drake

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Mr. Drake makes some compelling points. In the legislature it needs to be emphasized that the major argument against a reasonable minimum wage is always and almost exclusively focused on the deleterious impact it would have on employment. The facts are that never in the history of any minimum wage hike has employment went down. Not on a national level or on a state level. Never. That is why I normally support increases in the minimum wage.

    Mike Madden
    Dist. 40 Rep.
    Buffalo, WY

  2. Dunno how Kerry got all this Minimum Wage Hike monologue written down without once mentioning Sen. Charles Scott , the solon with his hand on the levers that control the flowgate of the legisation on this issue. I was thoroughly disgusted with Scott’s objection to a $9.00 MW as expressed in the Casper Star Tribune about 10 days back. Scott took that old tired no-longer-relevant Republican position that any job is a good job and there is no place for mandatory wage scales in free enterprise. He added some Charlie spice by saying he would not pay such a ” high ” wage to anyone who had not already proven his job skills and willingness to work by putting in servitude at a lower wage to prove his/her mettle.

    BS to that Charlie . You are about 20 years behind the times if you think a paltry $ 5.15 / hour wage is sufficient ( with deep apologies to Wyoming’s legions of waiters and waittresses who get a base wage of a couple bucks PRESUMING they will earn tips…how cynical is THAT ? ) . If Scott consider $ 3.00 or $ 5.00 and hour to be that training wage, or menial internship stipend , or whatever, he is grossly out of touch. Poor wages for honest work are not a blunt instrument to whip the labor pool into shape by thinning out the slackers. If you pay a wage that is 1/3rd or 1/4 of the local Living Wage, you are very likely to be paying that chickenfeed to a worker who will respond to it with disrespect, lack of diginity, and general malaise on the job. In other words a self fulfilling prophecy…You Get Who You Pay For.

    Scott is a sterling example of the Republican denial about the working concept of a Living Wage. MIT in Massachusetts recently issued a study about Living Wages nationwide. That study concluded the Living Wage in Wyoming should be $ 20.87 to overcome cost of living, housing, lack of insurance availability ( Charlie! pay attention here !!) … general coarseness of the workplace in the Wyoming economic climate. Without even comparing the Wyoming labor picture to any other state, MIT concluded a worker needs twenty bucks an hour to make it here in Wyoming with a steady 1-job 40 hour workweek. Oh by the way , Seattle just adopted a minimum wage of $ 15.00 / hour , locally.

    I anecdotally peg the Living Wage here in Cody — a unapologetically expensive town with notoriously bad wages ( we’re a seasonal tourist town full of service sector jobs and an appalling lack of economic diversity outside of government and school jobs ) —at $ 18.00 / hour . So maybe I’m also a little behind the job curve, too . I roughed it at $ 16.00 for the next town over, Powell , due to housing and gasoline being cheaper, and $ 14.00 – $ 15.00 over in the white ghettos along the Big Horn River in the county of the same name. Point being, the wild notion of raising Wyoming’s official state minimum wage from $ 5.15 / hour all the way to $ 9.00 in one swoop still does not come anywhere close to a realistic Living Wage. It’s only halfway. Every fast food franchise in Cody advertises $ 10.00 hour Help Wanted on their readerboard signs for much of the year.

    I expect the debate over the $ 9.00 minimum wage in the coming Lej to be “spirited” and very much raise the temperature in the room. Let us hope it makes it out of committee to an open floor discussion. This strikes at the core bone marrow of what is decidedly wrong about 21st century Republican ideology and policies ( or lack of them ). The Wyoming state house , being über-dominantly Republican , gets a chance to show it’s true colors and character with any discussion of increasing the Minimum Wage.

    Here we go…
    Dewey Vanderhoff
    Cody, WY