Lander— Facing a legal bill that already tops $1-million in a protracted Fremont County voting rights case and possible premium increases to its members, the Wyoming Local Government Liability Pool board has voted not to support an appeal in the federal action.

By a unanimous vote on Thursday, October 28, in Cheyenne, the seven-member board representing 20 Wyoming counties and 88 towns and cities said it would no longer provide legal coverage to Fremont County in the case.

“If Fremont County wants to pursue an appeal,” said Liability Pool executive director Mark Pring. “They will have to do it on their own.”

The board does plan to cover costs incurred by the county in the original case, while instructing its attorney to request the judge to lower the costs awarded.

In April, U.S. District Judge Alan Johnson ruled in favor of several Arapaho and Shoshone tribal members’ complaint that Fremont County’s at large election system discriminates against Native Americans on the Wind River Reservation.  Johnson ordered Fremont County adopt a district election plan. Wyoming law allows both at large and district county electoral systems.

This summer, Judge Johnson rejected two alternative Fremont County election proposals, one of which would have created a “Native American super-majority district” while electing the remaining four members at-large, as having been  “crafted in such a manner that they preserve the racial separation of the county.”

Fremont County has filed a notice that the county will appeal this narrower element of the case and asked the Local Government Liability Pool to pay for some of the legal costs. Fremont County is also represented pro bono as lead counsel by the Colorado-based non-profit, Mountain States Legal Foundation.

Since the original lawsuit was filed in 2005, the Local Government Liability Pool, a shared-risk legal cooperative that charges premiums to local governments, has paid $203,000 in attorneys’ fees and legal costs and faces another bill for $881,491 for plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs.

This compares to a total of $2.6 million in premiums, which the pool terms “contributions,” collected last year. In cases in which claims exceed reserves, said Pring, rates to all members can go up.

According to Pring, Fremont County paid $112,000 into the pool in the last fiscal year, a little more than a tenth of what the lawsuit is expected to cost the pool, not counting the cost of the appeal.

Interviewed before the board decision, Doug Thompson, chairman of the Fremont County board of commissioners said he was confident that the county would get backing from the Local Government Liability Pool.

“They’ve assured us that they are going to stick with us,” said Thompson. “They’ve been with us from the beginning and they’ve been very good to deal with.”

Thompson, a Sweetwater Station rancher, was working his stock Friday afternoon and not available for comment.

But already presented with the biggest bill in the 23-year history of the liability pool and facing possible rate increases to its members, the pool board had reached its limit.  They instructed executive director Pring to inform Fremont County that the pool would not cover costs of the appeal.

Board chairman Ron Crook, of Lincoln County; Brad Basse, Hot Springs County; Jim Hudelson, Goshen County; Linda Smith, Rawlins; Greg James, Newcastle; Don Richards, Shoshone and Bob Wood, Dayton, also instructed pool attorney Richard Rideout to ask Judge Johnson for a reduction in the $881,491 in plaintiffs’ attorney fees.

Fremont County and its attorneys have until Tuesday, November 2, to file a response to the plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in the original case.

Editor’s Note: This is a follow up to an earlier report by Rone Tempest: Voting Rights Case Drags on in Fremont County – At What Cost to Other Counties and Towns?

Rone Tempest was a longtime national and foreign correspondent for the Los Angeles Times. In 2004 he was part of a team of reporters to win the Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the massive wildfires in Southern...

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *