Several members of Cindy Hill's leadership team went on the trip to Jackson. From left, they are Kevin Lewis, John Masters, Cindy Hill, Christine Steele, Sam Shumway and Sheryl Lain. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile — click to view)
Superintendent Cindy Hill and her leadership team. From left, they are Kevin Lewis, John Masters, Cindy Hill, Christine Steele, Sam Shumway and Sheryl Lain. (Gregory Nickerson/WyoFile — click to view)

Wyoming Supreme Court denies rehearing in Cindy Hill case

By Gregory Nickerson
— February 28, 2014

The Wyoming Supreme Court has denied a petition from state Attorney General Peter Michael for a rehearing on the case that struck down Senate File 104. The action sends the case back to district court to provide further guidance to the legislature on how to proceed.

The denial comes a month after the court’s original decision on the matter. In a 3-2 vote, the justices ruled that the 2013 law violated the Wyoming Constitution by transferring too many duties of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to an appointed director.

In the letter sent by the court today, Justice James Burke rebuked the state for its concerns over disruption caused by the court’s decision, noting the state had no apparent concern for disruption to the Superintendent. He also saw no need to provide further guidance that the state requested:

“With all due respect to the dissent, we have already provided all of the guidance requested by the district court when we answered the certified questions in our original opinion. We do not see anything ‘unfair’ or ‘improper’ about returning this case to the district court where this action is pending.”

Chief Justice Marilyn Kite offered a dissenting view:

“Contrary to the manner in which the majority chooses to handle this matter, this Court should follow the precedent established in the long line of school finance cases by providing parameters for the district court and the legislature to use in determining which powers and duties may appropriately be transferred from the office of superintendent of public instruction and which powers and duties may not be transferred.”

In a separate action earlier today, the Senate Education committee confirmed Richard Crandall as director of the Wyoming Department of Education. He was appointed to the position last summer by Gov. Matt Mead, but waited to be confirmed until the 2014 legislative session.

Earlier this week, the Senate passed Senate File 106 which would provide for a process to reconsider the role of the Superintendent of Public Instruction in light of the court’s January 28 decision. That bill passed the House Education Committee today and will be considered on the House floor during the last week of the budget session. If the bill passes, the legislature will likely convene a special session later this spring regarding the matter.

 Supreme Court Letter

— Gregory Nickerson is the government and policy reporter for WyoFile. He writes the Capitol Beat blog. Contact him at greg@wyofile.com.

SUPPORT: If you enjoy WyoFile’s 2014 coverage of the Wyoming Legislature and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting us. WyoFile is a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.
 
REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Gregory Nickerson worked as government and policy reporter for WyoFile from 2012-2015. He studied history at the University of Wyoming. Follow Greg on Twitter at @GregNickersonWY and on www.facebook.com/GregoryNickersonWriter/

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Assuming lawmakers get their way, and succeed in arming the state’s teachers to the teeth……Will Ms. Hill still be commander-in-chief of this rag-tag militia, or will we have to “sub-contract” those duties too????? “Just askin’…….”