Focus on veterans’ care, not casting partisan blame

By Kerry Drake
— May 27, 2014

Is it actually possible that a day after America has observed yet another solemn Memorial Day, with politicians waxing eloquently about the need to honor our veterans who gave their lives in battle for their country, Congress is mired in yet another partisan fight about how to properly take care of the wounded veterans who are returning from our last two wars?

Kerry Drake
Kerry Drake

The long lines veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are experiencing as they wait to see a doctor at Veterans Administration hospitals is a shameful indictment of how poorly our nation actually treats military veterans. The fact this serves not as a call to fix the problems but as just another opportunity to score political points by blaming the other side only compounds the tragedy.

There is no lack of blame to be assigned for the terrible state of our VA health care system. Fighting two long wars in the Middle East cost thousands of lives and trillions of dollars, and both Republicans and Democrats supported them. Some wrapped themselves in the U.S. flag. Yet when it became clear that a suddenly overloaded VA system didn’t have anywhere near the capacity to treat these new wounded warriors, Congress balked at adequately funding major improvements.

The problem of extended wait times at VA hospitals was identified long ago, and several measures were taken, intended to reduce the time for veterans to have their medical needs evaluated. After some apparent progress was made, the problem still increased to the point that some veterans had to wait more than six months for an appointment. Sadly, many died before they could be treated.

Documents were allegedly falsified at many VA hospitals, including in Cheyenne, to make it appear the agency was meeting its goal of seeing patients within 14 days. It boggles the mind how a problem of this magnitude could exist for so long that the Obama administration claims it learned about it through CNN, and not the whistle-blowers who were coming forward with patients’ horror stories.

Still, there were enough legislative attempts in recent years to increase VA funding to show that some members of Congress were paying attention. Unfortunately, the partisan bickering that has stalled almost all major legislation in the past year derailed these efforts as well.

In February, Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) sponsored a bill to boost VA funding by $21 billion. Part of the increase was directly aimed at reducing hospital wait times for veterans, which may not have uncovered all the ways VA employees attempted to game the system with phony paperwork, but would have gone a long way toward starting to eliminate the current problems. If it had passed Congress, the VA would now be focusing on solutions instead of politicians scurrying to avoid blame and pass the buck.

Sanders’ measure would have done a lot to improve other aspects of VA services. That $21 billion would have also opened VA care to include many more veterans, as well as expand education benefits for survivors and new veterans. More VA hospitals would have been added, along with the necessary staff.

The bill added money to increase programs for veterans who suffered sexual abuse, increased dental care and expanded aid to relatives caring for wounded veterans to include those who served before 9/11. The bill also would have provided fertility or adoption services for wounded troops left unable to conceive.

Those are all improvements Democrats and Republicans should embrace. Yet when it came time to consider the bill, the GOP Senate leadership blocked it. Democrats were able to get only two Republicans – Sens. Dean Heller of Nevada and Jerry Moran of Kansas – to vote with them. Three more were needed to end the opponent’s filibuster.

It’s a good time to ask Wyoming’s pair of U.S. senators, Mike Enzi and John Barrasso, what they objected to in the bill that prevented them from wanting to get wounded veterans seen by doctors more quickly, plus all the other benefits Sanders’ bill contained. If we all agree our nation has a sacred obligation to take care of the men and women who put their lives on the line so the rest of us can live free, $21 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to what we’ve spent to wage war in Iraq and Afghanistan and to rebuild those countries.

Republicans charged that Sanders had no way to offset the cost of the VA bill with spending cuts – a condition they mandated for new expenditures only after Obama entered the White House. But Sanders did have a way to pay for his measure, by using the money that the U.S. would have spent in Afghanistan if Obama had not ordered most troops to return home.

The GOP called that a gimmick. But gimmicks are a funny thing – both Congressional Republicans and Democrats use them all the time to get what they want, and if the cause is just, they often work. Even if you label it a gimmick, it spends just like real money, and it would have helped real people; the veterans whom we say we honor in both war and peace.

Sanders has vowed he will return with his bill in some form, and it deserves serious consideration from Enzi and Barrasso, who put out a joint news release last week with Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.). It was headlined, “Wyoming Delegation Concerned VA Putting Veterans’ Lives at Risk.”

I was afraid the delegation might limit itself to casting political blame for the VA scandal, but to its credit, it didn’t do that. However, it also failed to look at the big picture, and beyond trying to find out what low-level bureaucrats were responsible for gaming the system at the Cheyenne VA. These people need to be exposed and punished, but the overarching need at this moment is to find ways for Congress to approve the amount of funding necessary to fix the VA’s unacceptable backlog in patient care.

Last Friday, Sanders blocked an effort by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to quickly pass a bill that would make it much easier for the VA to fire people responsible for the scandal. Rubio charged Sanders was just trying to protect the administration from having to fire its appointees.

But Sanders is truly an independent senator who has never been guilty of trying to protect the Obama administration. Unlike many of his colleagues, he’s focused on trying to find solutions to the VA’s problems without turning it into a witch hunt. He knows there’s enough time to investigate who is responsible for the fraud that occurred and to appropriately punish them. What isn’t needed is a rush to judgment just to embarrass one political party while pretending that the other isn’t also partially responsible for this shameful fiasco.

There is plenty of time to identify criminal misdeeds and bring people to justice. There is not enough time to end these obscenely long wait times to see a VA doctor before more people needlessly die. We’ve run out of that. And turning our attention into another partisan blame game isn’t going to make the problem go away.
— Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake is a contributor to WyoHistory.org. He also moderates the WyPols blog.

— Columns are the signed perspective of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of WyoFile’s staff, board of directors or its supporters. WyoFile welcomes guest columns and op-ed pieces from all points of view. If you’d like to write a guest column for WyoFile, please contact WyoFile editor-in-chief Dustin Bleizeffer at dustin@wyofile.com.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

If you enjoyed this post and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

Veteran Wyoming journalist Kerry Drake has covered Wyoming for more than four decades, previously as a reporter and editor for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle and Casper Star-Tribune. He lives in Cheyenne and...

Join the Conversation


Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The USS Liberty Memorial
    Americans who volunteer for military service effectively write a blank check, payable to the United States of America for an amount “up to and including my life.” The United States, in turn, promises to spend these checks responsibly. That bargain implicitly includes a promise by the United States to protect them and to seek retribution against anyone who harms them. In the case of USS Liberty, the United States has failed to keep its end of the bargain.

    The bureaucratic bloated behemoth we call our government
    Politicizing, fear, hate, division, no responsibility, no accountability,,, Sickening!!

  2. Good job Kerry. However there is an issue that is being conveniently overlooked in all of this. Ask our Congressional delegation why Honorably Discharged veterans are being denied enrollment in the VA medical system based on their income and where they live. A vet in Jackson with a $43000 income is admitted if he lived in Riverton and had the same income he would be denied. In 2003 VA decided that acceptance into the VA medical system would be income qualified (no Obama was not President then). No one asked what your annual income was when they put a rifle in your hands. No one tells Congress they make too much to get government medical coverage. If anyone in Congress really gave a damn about vets they’d be addressing this as well. Just one more way that America says thanks for your service to Vietnam era vets. Yeah right

  3. Thank you, Kerry, for a concise and reasonable description of the problem. I want to point out one thing that Obama and Shinseki did that directly affected me and thousand of other Viet vets. Three years ago they ordered that we be moved to the head of the line on disability evaluations, and prompt payment when proved valid. The unwritten policy before they intervened was “Deny until they die”, and more vets died under bridges and behind dumpsters than the 58,000 killed in the war because of that “policy”. I had been pounding on the VA door for nine years and was denied time and time again. However in a matter of months, and after more than 40 years, I and thousands of other vets were finally given our ratings when Obama ordered it. I am grateful to him and the Secretary, but certainly not to the VA bureaucrats who were in on that conspiracy too. I do want to add that my health care has been mostly excellent, and cost me very, very, little.

  4. A factual comment on this terrible problem. The politicians are quick to drop the hammer on sending our young men and women to fight a battle that never needed to be fought in the first place. Then they tell us how much they love and respect the troops and wear their little flag pins on their well tailored suit coat lapels. They have no hesitation spending trillions to wage the unnecessary war and then bulk at spending pocket change in comparison to care for the troops once they come home.

    One headline today states that 1,892 Veterans have committed suicide since January 1st, yet another report from the Veterans affairs office reports that 22 Vets commit suicide daily, which would make that total since January 1st 3,234. The majority of these Vets are being treated with SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) which all of them have a black box warning that there is an increased risk of suicide as an adverse reaction. Frequently, antipsychotics are added to the SSRIs. It is much quicker to just write a prescription and send them out the door rather than staff mental clinics with enough counselors to spend time with the Vets. Again, lack of funding! Right now, the Las Vegas VA hospital is having a hard time staffing it’s Emergency Department and the main reason is that the pay is not as competitive as what a physician can earn in the private sector.