Cattle in rural Wyoming. (Aaron Groote/FlickrCC)

The last time I purchased a package of underwear, I checked where it was made. After reading the label, I was certain the materials used were obtained in the USA, but the garment was assembled in another country. That was OK with me, so I made my purchase. Then I went to the grocery section of the store. I reached for a package of steak, and the label read “Product of the USA.” Was I as safe in making the same assumption about the origin of this high-end product as I was about my lowly underwear?

Opinion

I posed this question to an assortment of acquaintances: “What do you know about a package of meat if the label reads “Product of the USA?” The responses were all over the map. Some people thought the label suggested that the animal had been born and raised in the United States, but it might have been sent to a foreign country for slaughter and processing. Others thought the animal had spent its entire life here and was processed here. Some suggested this meant it was higher quality than other meats. Most were pretty sure it came from a Wyoming ranch. They were united only in the thought that the beef was raised in the United States. 

So they struggled to believe me when I explained they were mistaken, that they had been duped, that this label means nothing beyond the plastic being stretched over the package somewhere within the borders of the United States.

We Americans tend to believe our labels, and that is exactly why we need to institute a mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) rule. The time has passed for allowing reluctant meat processors, hesitant big-ag groups and foreign trade agreements to prevent American consumers from knowing where their meat was born, raised, fed and processed. The time for forcing independent meat producers in the United States to compete with cheap, possibly inferior products, produced in other countries is long gone.

Fortunately, a new campaign for reform has drawn the attention of some members of Congress. U.S. Sens. John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis (both R-Wyoming) have joined colleagues from other mostly Western states to sponsor a bill, The American Beef Labeling Act, to clarify and require country of origin labeling for meat. They deserve our thanks for taking this initiative. They will also require strong public comment in order to move this bill through our legislative bodies and see it through to becoming law.

Wyoming ranchers deal with incredible obstacles when raising the animals that eventually become part of our diet, including genetics, environmental conditions of their ranch, animal-husbandry and veterinary practices, nutrition and more. Then they must navigate a sales system stacked against them, selling on a market flooded with beef from foreign countries. And, finally, their product is sold to consumers in competition with beef gathered from all over the globe. The product presented to the consumer was obtained by a grocery supplier based on the lowest wholesale price to the supermarket. Why on earth would a young person want to go into the beef production business?

Please purchase beef that really was raised in Wyoming if you possibly can, and expect the United States to be more concerned about the origin of your steak than it is with my package of underwear.

Joyce evans

In addition to burdens on the livestock producer, cost and health risks to the consumer also play into this topic. But many people are willing to spend more of their  income on quality products. They will vote with their dollars and likely discriminate between carefully raised American beef and inferior products. If this bill is passed, it would give them a clearer choice. There are other consumers in our country who do not have the luxury of being picky about their food purchases. It is my contention that those people also deserve to know the origin of the food they put on their tables. They, too, deserve good quality food, and they should not be paying more for poorer quality meats. This bill will increase the availability of higher quality products to every consumer in the United States. 

Please support the efforts of our senators to get this legislation passed. Please purchase beef that really was raised in Wyoming if you possibly can, and expect the United States to be more concerned about the origin of your steak than it is with my package of underwear.

Joyce Evans

Joyce Evans is a fourth-generation rancher originally from Carbon County, Wyoming where her family ranch is located. Although retired, she maintains an active interest in cattle raising and ranching practices....

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules: * Provide your full name — no pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same. * No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic. *WyoFile does not fact check every comment but, when noticed, submissions containing clear misinformation, demonstrably false statements of fact or links to sites trafficking in such will not be posted. *Individual commenters are limited to three comments per story, including replies.

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Thank you for a great article. This is very important. We go out of our way to buy Wyoming-made products. Meat is especially important. We should know origin, ranching practices, feed, etc. right on the label. Yes, you may pay more for local healthy meat for your family. But isn’t eating right and supporting local ranches important? I eat junk too sometimes. But I want to be the one making that decision. Liberty matters 24/7. I’d like to see a coding system that lays it out simply.

  2. I thought WY was the first in the US to utilize blockchain in their beef industry which would provide every little bit of information anyone could possibly imagine. While the information is endless and certainly wouldn’t fit on a packaging label, just knowing where to research this would be hugely helpful. Yes, buy local, support our farmers who do a tremendous job putting food on our tables.

  3. For most beef consumers in Wyoming, there are local producers selling their beef locally. No need to worry about what’s on the label, ask those producers specific questions about issues you are concerned with, regarding how they raise their beef. Ask if you can come out and see how they do it. If you are in the Cody area, come on out and see how Ishawooa Mesa Ranch raises beef!

  4. Joyce raises some good points, but we need to enforce and define our current meat-product labels before we embark on an effort to create even more of them. Can anyone accurately describe the difference between the ubiquitous “pasture-raised” or “cage-free” or “natural” or “grass-fed” labels? There’s a good argument that these definitions matter more to consumers than country of origin, certainly to the extent that they would be willing to pay more for them. I would gladly pay more for carefully raised American beef — Joyce’s specifically! — but it’s the “carefully-raised” part that matters more. An American-made label doesn’t assure that.

  5. Origin is only part of the problem. For those who are concerned about the environment, as well as taste and health, how animals are raised is important. This could be complicated, with varying amounts of grazing vs grain feeding, but it is worth looking at. I get beef that meets my needs from a local rancher. Everyone should have the option to know what they are getting. It could help increase the market share of Wyoming beef.