After the Wyoming Freedom Caucus did not accomplish many of its goals in the 2026 budget session, the group of hard-line House Republicans said the more moderate in comparison Senate and governor had stood in the way.

The caucus, which holds a majority in the House, is now setting its sights on the upper chamber, with several of its members and allies leaving the House to pursue Senate seats. Among those races, the marquee competition is likely Speaker of the House Chip Neiman, R-Hulett, versus the incumbent Sen. Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower. 

Wyoming’s 1st Senate District includes Crook and parts of Campbell and Weston counties Sen. Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower, has represented the district since 2011. (Wyoming Legislature)

The two Republicans will square off in the primary election for Senate District 1, which encompasses the northeastern corner of the state, including all of Crook County and sections of Campbell and Weston counties. 

Both men are lifelong ranchers with deep family ties to the area, and both have served in top legislative leadership positions during tumultuous times for their respective chambers. Each embodies the Republican split in the statehouse: Neiman, who is part of the Freedom Caucus and its allies, and Driskill, who represents the traditional wing of the Wyoming GOP.

Neiman did not respond to several requests for an interview before publication. On the last day of the 2026 session, which had been embroiled in controversy involving campaign checks handed out on the House floor, he announced his campaign plans. 

“I’m going to run for Senate,” Neiman said. “I’m going to make my move, and I’m going to see if I can do any good over in that way, if the people of my district see fit to think that that might be somewhere where I can be useful. If they so see fit, that’s my plan.” 

“And if the Lord says, ‘you’re better off staying home and feeding cows and cutting hay,’ I’m good with that, too,” Neiman told his colleagues. 

Driskill, who has represented Senate District 1 since 2011, regularly spars with the Freedom Caucus, including on social media. The caucus has accused Driskill of not being conservative enough, while Driskill has accused the caucus of getting its marching orders from Washington. 

With his fourth term coming to an end in January, Driskill did not intend to seek reelection. The 2026 session, however, changed his mind, he said. 

“I’m not going to allow Speaker Neiman to walk in easily into the Senate,” Driskill said. 

“I believe that this race is a referendum on: Do you want Freedom Caucus-style politics? Or do you want the style of politics that we work together with everybody and we come up with good policy for Wyoming?” he said. 

In particular, Driskill pointed to the “Checkgate” controversy and the budget process as examples of the caucus’ character. The former involved a Teton County conservative handing out campaign checks to lawmakers on the House floor on the first day of the 2026 session and the legislation she advocated for. Both chambers voted to prohibit such behavior after WyoFile and the Jackson Hole News&Guide broke the story. The outlets also first reported that the donor, Don Grasso, said he had written 10 checks — all of which were intended for Republicans with ties to the Freedom Caucus — including Neiman. 

After that report and after Neiman appointed members of a House Special Investigative Committee to examine the matter, he acknowledged that Bextel had given him one of the checks in question in the speaker’s office. Neiman denied wrongdoing, including in his remarks on the last day of the session. 

“I’m gonna go home and I’m gonna try to explain some things to my people at home. I don’t think I really should have had to explain, but I’m gonna,” Neiman said, before offering his “full and complete forgiveness” to “anyone in this chamber.” 

He had previously criticized the two Democratic lawmakers — Reps. Karlee Provenza and Mike Yin — for bringing the checks to the public’s attention. 

A House Special Investigative Committee called the conduct “undesirable” but found that the exchange of checks on the floor did not violate the Wyoming Constitution nor did it amount to legislative misconduct. A Laramie County Sheriff’s Office criminal investigation is still underway. 

Driskill said he didn’t expect law enforcement to find that any laws were broken, but the series of events was “unbelievable.” 

“For people that claim to be transparent and take the high ground, this scandal is anything but,” Driskill said.

Ahead of the session, the caucus — which holds a majority on the Joint Appropriations Committee via members and allies — set out to shrink the size and scope of the state’s budget as its top priority

Though it never provided a precise number for its desired spending reduction, the caucus made some targets clear through the process. Those included axing $40 million from the University of Wyoming’s block grant, defunding the Wyoming Business Council and halting state dollars from going to Wyoming Public Media. None of those proposals survived. 

“Was it the budget that we wanted? Not exactly,” House Appropriations Chairman John Bear and former caucus chairman said at a post-session press conference. 

“But we did something I think everybody should take note of, and that is that we held the reins back,” Bear said.

The Legislature approved a budget $53 million shy of Gov. Mark Gordon’s $11 billion in recommendations — meaning, the governor got more than 99% of what he asked for. 

Driskill, alongside 16 other senators, sponsored an amendment to largely restore the budget bill to Gordon’s recommendations, pushing directly back on the Freedom Caucus. It was around that time, Driskill told WyoFile, that “people started calling me,” and saying “look, you cannot allow the Freedom Caucus to come over [to the Senate].”

The caucus’ four other top priorities, which included bills related to elections, library materials and the judicial branch, did not make it into law. But at a post-session press conference, the Freedom Caucus argued that those failures show the necessity of the group’s mission to see a state government that reflects the conservative leanings of the state’s voters. 

“Regardless of where our priorities failed, it’s clear that we need reinforcements in Cheyenne,” Freedom Caucus Chairwoman Rachel Rodriguez-Williams said. 

The Cody Republican is now running for secretary of state, while several other members and allies of the Freedom Caucus will run for Senate seats. Those lawmakers include Reps. Abby Angelos, R-Gillette, Paul Hoeft, R-Powell, Ken Pendergraft, R-Sheridan, and Daniel Singh, R-Cheyenne. 

Chip Neiman

After voters first elected Neiman to House District 1 in 2020, the lawmaker had a meteoric rise through the lower chamber’s ranks. 

In just his second term, Neiman’s Republican colleagues elected him House Majority Floor Leader. The position has traditionally gone to more senior lawmakers due, in part, to its powerful role in choosing the order of bills heard on the House floor, which, because of deadlines in the statehouse, can dictate which bills live and die. In 2024, after the Freedom Caucus won control of the House, Neiman was elected speaker in his third term.

Rep. Chip Neiman (R-Hulett) at his ranch on the edge of the Bear Lodge Mountains in December 2022. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

As a lawmaker, Neiman has largely focused on legislation to restrict or outright ban abortion in Wyoming. He was lead sponsor of the state’s newest anti-abortion law, which prohibits abortion in all but the earliest weeks of pregnancy, except in the case of a medical emergency. Under the law, if abortion providers fail to check for a fetal heartbeat, they could face up to five years in prison and the loss of their medical license. 

It’s now being challenged in court on the same basis that two other abortion bans were ruled unconstitutional by the Wyoming Supreme Court in January. In that ruling, the high court determined both bans violated the state’s constitution, which protects an individual’s right to make their own health care decisions. 

In 2022, 2023 and 2025, Neiman brought legislation to require runoff elections in certain races if a primary election winner receives less than 51% of the vote. None made it into law, but Neiman has said such legislation is needed to ensure candidates get a majority of support from voters before serving in public office. 

Ogden Driskill

Early in his tenure in the Senate, Driskill focused on agricultural and water-use issues, first serving as a member on related committees. 

In the last decade, he has chaired the Blockchain Task Force; the Senate Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee; the Select Natural Resources Funding Committee; the Senate Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee; and the Air Transportation Liaison Committee. 

Sen. Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower), the president of the Wyoming Senate, speaks from his living room in November 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)

As Senate vice president, Driskill signed a letter alongside 31 other lawmakers in response to President Joe Biden’s 2020 win, urging Gov. Mark Gordon to add Wyoming to a lawsuit brought by the Texas attorney general to overturn the presidential election results of four swing states. 

In 2023, his peers elected him as Senate president. The next year, however, they voted on day one of the budget session to override a decision he had made regarding committee assignments, setting the tone for much of the session, which culminated in the budget bill passing the Senate by a single vote.  

As a lawmaker, Driskill has recently sponsored legislation to create the Wyoming charter school authorizing board, to establish a subcommittee to study the topic of county-aligned legislative districts and to financially incentivize the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association to Wyoming. 

Wyoming’s official candidate filing period opens May 14.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *